| Literature DB >> 27167342 |
Xiumei Jiang1, Lutao Du1, Weili Duan1, Rui Wang1, Keqiang Yan2, Lili Wang1, Juan Li1, Guixi Zheng1, Xin Zhang1, Yongmei Yang1, Chuanxin Wang1.
Abstract
Noninvasive biomarkers for predicting the risk of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) may expedite appropriate therapy and reduce morbidity and cost. Genome-wide miRNA analysis by Miseq sequencing followed by two phases of reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays were performed on serum from 207 MIBC patients, 285 nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients and 193 controls. A four-miRNA panel (miR-422a-3p, miR-486-3p, miR-103a-3p and miR-27a-3p) was developed for MIBC prediction with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.894 (95% CI, 0.846-0.931) for training set. Prospective evaluation of the miRNA panel revealed an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI, 0.834 to 0.917) in validation set, which was significantly higher than those of grade and urine cytology (both p < 0.05). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that MIBC patients with low miR-486-3p and miR-103a-3p levels had worse overall survival (p = 0.002 and p = 0.034, respectively). Cox analysis indicated miR-486-3p and miR-103a-3p were independently associated with overall survival of MIBC (p = 0.042 and p = 0.021, respectively). In conclusion, serum miRNA signatures might have considerable clinical values in predicting and providing prognostic information for MIBC.Entities:
Keywords: microRNA; muscle-invasive bladder cancer; prediction; prognosis; serum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27167342 PMCID: PMC5095035 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Concentrations of four miRNAs in MIBC patients (n = 111), NMIBC patients (n = 111) and control individuals (n = 187) using RT-qPCR assay in training set A-D. *p< 0.05
Figure 2ROC curves analysis for detection of MIBC using A. miR-422a-3p, B. miR-486-3p, C. miR-103a-3p, D. miR-27a-3p in MIBC patients (n = 111), NMIBC patients (n = 111) and control individuals (n = 187) in training set
Expression of four miRNAs in serum in NMIBC patients and MIBC patients in training set and validation set [median (interquartile range)]
| miRNA | Training set | Validation set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMIBCs | MIBCs | NMIBCs | MIBCs | |||
| miR-422a-3p | 1.24 (0.67-1.79) | 0.48 (0.23-0.85) | < 0.001 | 1.08 (0.65-1.53) | 0.53 (0.33-0.79) | < 0.001 |
| miR-486-3p | 1.61 (0.54-2.01) | 0.52 (0.25-1.01) | < 0.001 | 1.04 (0.70-1.74) | 0.55 (0.36-0.92) | < 0.001 |
| miR-103a-3p | 1.27 (0.59-1.78) | 0.60 (0.33-0.96) | < 0.001 | 0.97 (0.69-1.53) | 0.65 (0.40-0.96) | < 0.001 |
| miR-27a-3p | 1.04 (0.59-2.03) | 0.68 (0.42-1.25) | < 0.001 | 1.04 (0.67-1.81) | 0.71 (0.47-1.23) | < 0.001 |
Figure 3A-B. ROC curves for detection of MIBC using the four-miRNA panel in training set (A) and validation set (B); C. ROC curve analysis using grade for detection of MIBC in validation set; D. ROC curve analysis using urine cytology for prediction of MIBC in validation set.
Tumor staging classification performance of miRNA panel in BC patients in validation set
| Tumor stage | Specificity (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Ta (n = 55) | 61.82 (47.7-74.6) | — |
| T1 (n = 113) | 71.68 (62.4-79.8) | — |
| T2 (n = 28) | — | 78.57 (59.0-91.7) |
| T3 (n = 39) | — | 87.18 (72.6-95.7) |
| T4 (n = 23) | — | 95.65 (78.0-99.3) |
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier curves for OS according to serum levels of A. miR-486-3p, B. miR-103a-3p in MIBC patients in validation set
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis of OS in MIBC patients in validation set
| Parameters | Categories | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||||
| Age | < 65 vs. ≥ 65 | 1.505 (0.789-2.872) | 0.215 | ||
| Sex | Male vs. female | 0.670 (0.262-1.715) | 0.404 | ||
| Tumor stage | T2 vs. T3 vs. T4 | 1.830 (1.201-2.788) | 0.005 | 1.682 (1.053-2.687) | 0.030 |
| Tumor grade | Low vs. high | 1.002 (0.419-2.392) | 0.997 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | Negative vs. positive | 2.285 (1.079-4.839) | 0.031 | 2.418 (1.116-5.237) | 0.025 |
| miR-422a-3p expression | Low vs. high | 1.083 (0.578-2.030) | 0.804 | ||
| miR-486-3p expression | Low vs. high | 0.380 (0.199-0.728) | 0.004 | 0.500 (0.257-0.974) | 0.042 |
| miR-103a-3p expression | Low vs. high | 0.509 (0.268-0.967) | 0.039 | 0.460 (0.237-0.891) | 0.021 |
| miR-27a-3p expression | Low vs. high | 1.660 (0.881-3.130) | 0.117 | ||
Figure 5Study outline