Literature DB >> 16518814

Risk factors for adverse outcomes after transurethral resection of bladder tumors.

Brent K Hollenbeck1, David C Miller, David Taub, Rodney L Dunn, Shukri F Khuri, William G Henderson, James E Montie, Willie Underwood, John T Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for adverse outcomes after transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) have not been identified to date. Such information would facilitate preoperative risk stratification and case-mix-adjusted outcome comparison, and lead to the development of processes of care directed at improving outcomes and ultimately the quality of care for bladder carcinoma patients.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) is a prospective quality management initiative of 123 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers nationwide. Since 1991, a total of 21,515 TURBTs have been prospectively registered by the NSQIP; these cases compose the current study population. Using multivariable logistic regression, the authors determined the independent association between preoperative patient risk factors and perioperative elements of structure/process and morbidity, mortality, and prolonged length of stay (LOS) outcomes.
RESULTS: The postoperative complication, 30-day, and 90-day mortality rates were 4.3%, 1.3%, and 3.3%, respectively. The median, 75th percentile, and 90th percentile for LOS among patients undergoing TURBT was 2 days, 3 days, and 8 days, respectively. Robust preoperative patient risk factors that were found to be uniformly associated with all adverse outcomes included the presence of disseminated disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.9-5.2) weight loss (OR, 1.8-3.8), low serum albumin (OR, 2.3-7.1), elevated serum creatinine (OR, 1.3-2.9), a dependent functional status (OR, 1.5-2.7), and emergent case status (OR, 1.8-3.1). Compared with models using preoperative patient factors alone, models including perioperative structure and process measures explained further variation in surgical outcomes (each likelihood ratio test, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study highlight the fact that there are a wide array of patient risk factors that are associated with adverse outcomes after TURBT. Validation of those processes implemented to modify such elements can provide a basis for quality metrics in the context of TURBT. Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16518814     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of three different antibiotic protocols in transurethral resection of bladder tumour and the possible infectious risk factors: A non-randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  Jorge Panach-Navarrete; Lorena Valls-González; Eduardo Sánchez-Cano; María Medina-González; Ana Castelló-Porcar; José María Martínez-Jabaloyas
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Perioperative outcomes following radical prostatectomy for patients with disseminated cancer: An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Raj Satkunasivam; Christopher J D Wallis; James Byrne; Azik Hoffman; Douglas C Cheung; Girish S Kulkarni; Avery B Nathens; Robert K Nam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The impact of frequent cystoscopy on surgical care and cancer outcomes among patients with low-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Kristine E Lynch; Zhongze Li; Todd A MacKenzie; David S Han; John D Seigne; Douglas J Robertson; Brenda Sirovich; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Where the Other Half Dies: Analysis of Mortalities Occurring More Than 30 Days After Complex Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Benjamin J Resio; Lou Gonsalves; Maureen Canavan; Lloyd Mueller; Cathryn Phillips; Tejas Sathe; Katrina Swett; Daniel J Boffa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer cystoscopic surveillance: from overuse to underuse and non-adherence impact.

Authors:  Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 6.  Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: Improving Quality Through New Techniques and Technologies.

Authors:  Daniel Zainfeld; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  [Prognostic value of preoperative serum albumin in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor].

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Fei Li; Fan Yang; Wen-Li Zeng; Hao Lin; Qi-Liang Zhai; Ming-Qiang Su; Zi-Hao Chen; Wan-Long Tan
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-02-20

8.  Morbidity of urologic surgical procedures: an analysis of rates, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Mark W Ball; Jason E Cohen; Max Kates; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Ten-Year Review of Perioperative Complications After Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: Analysis of Monopolar and Plasmakinetic Bipolar Cases.

Authors:  Michael A Avallone; Bryan S Sack; Ahmad El-Arabi; David K Charles; William R Herre; Andrew C Radtke; Carley M Davis; William A See
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Investigating the relationship between virtual cystoscopy image quality and CT slice thickness.

Authors:  S Lalondrelle; S A Sohaib; I A Castellano; D Mears; R Huddart; V Khoo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.