Literature DB >> 27167062

Does being an Olympic city help improve recreational resources? Examining the quality of physical activity resources in a low-income neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro.

Fabiana R de Sousa-Mast1, Arianne C Reis2, Marcelo C Vieira3, Sandro Sperandei4, Luilma A Gurgel5, Uwe Pühse6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of public physical activity resources (PARs) in a low socio-economic community in the Olympic city of Rio de Janeiro.
METHODS: The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument was used to assess all 29 public PARs located in this community. A quality indicator (QI) was developed based on PARA results.
RESULTS: The average QI of the areas assessed was 1.3 ± 6.40 and the median 1 point, a considerably low score if compared to scores of public PARs across the city (13.6 ± 4.91 and 13 points).
CONCLUSIONS: The urban regeneration necessary for hosting mega-sport events is frequently promoted as an opportunity to enhance PARs and therefore to improve health through physical activity (PA) participation. Findings indicate that the high number of elements that can discourage the use of these spaces may help explain the low level of PA during leisure time that has been previously reported of residents of the same neighborhood. Whether using the Olympic Games as catalyst or not, policies designed to encourage PA should focus also on the built environment.

Keywords:  Built environment; Low socio-economic status community; Physical activity resources; Rio 2016 Olympic Games

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27167062     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-016-0827-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  19 in total

1.  Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review.

Authors:  Nancy Humpel; Neville Owen; Eva Leslie
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: an exploration of inconsistent findings.

Authors:  Sarah Foster; Billie Giles-Corti
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments.

Authors:  Andrea Abraham; Kathrin Sommerhalder; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Out and about: association of the built environment with physical activity behaviors of adolescent females.

Authors:  Daniel A Rodríguez; Gi-Hyoug Cho; Kelly R Evenson; Terry L Conway; Deborah Cohen; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Julie L Pickrel; Sara Veblen-Mortenson; Leslie A Lytle
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.078

5.  Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons.

Authors:  Ethan M Berke; Thomas D Koepsell; Anne Vernez Moudon; Richard E Hoskins; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood.

Authors:  James F Sallis; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  2006

7.  Evaluating the quality and accessibility of physical activity resources in two southern cities.

Authors:  Heather J Adamus; Scherezade K Mama; Iman Sahnoune; Rebecca E Lee
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

8.  Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status?

Authors:  David Crawford; Anna Timperio; Billie Giles-Corti; Kylie Ball; Clare Hume; Rebecca Roberts; Nick Andrianopoulos; Jo Salmon
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.078

9.  Can the London 2012 Olympics 'inspire a generation' to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Kamal Ram Mahtani; Joanne Protheroe; Sarah Patricia Slight; Marcelo Marcos Piva Demarzo; Thomas Blakeman; Christopher A Barton; Bianca Brijnath; Nia Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods.

Authors:  Rebecca E Lee; Katie M Booth; Jacqueline Y Reese-Smith; Gail Regan; Hugh H Howard
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.