Literature DB >> 18086547

Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status?

David Crawford1, Anna Timperio, Billie Giles-Corti, Kylie Ball, Clare Hume, Rebecca Roberts, Nick Andrianopoulos, Jo Salmon.   

Abstract

This study examined the relations between neighbourhood socio-economic status and features of public open spaces (POS) hypothesised to influence children's physical activity. Data were from the first follow-up of the Children Living in Active Neighbourhoods (CLAN) Study, which involved 540 families of 5-6 and 10-12-year-old children in Melbourne, Australia. The Socio-Economic Index for Areas Index (SEIFA) of Relative Socio-economic Advantage/Disadvantage was used to assign a socioeconomic index score to each child's neighbourhood, based on postcode. Participant addresses were geocoded using a Geographic Information System. The Open Space 2002 spatial data set was used to identify all POS within an 800 m radius of each participant's home. The features of each of these POS (1497) were audited. Variability of POS features was examined across quintiles of neighbourhood SEIFA. Compared with POS in lower socioeconomic neighbourhoods, POS in the highest socioeconomic neighbourhoods had more amenities (e.g. picnic tables and drink fountains) and were more likely to have trees that provided shade, a water feature (e.g. pond, creek), walking and cycling paths, lighting, signage regarding dog access and signage restricting other activities. There were no differences across neighbourhoods in the number of playgrounds or the number of recreation facilities (e.g. number of sports catered for on courts and ovals, the presence of other facilities such as athletics tracks, skateboarding facility and swimming pool). This study suggests that POS in high socioeconomic neighbourhoods possess more features that are likely to promote physical activity amongst children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18086547     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Place        ISSN: 1353-8292            Impact factor:   4.078


  60 in total

1.  The relationship between local food sources and open space to body mass index in urban children.

Authors:  James J Burns; Sarah Goff; Greg Karamian; Coleen Walsh; Lela Hobby; Jane Garb
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Youth physical activity opportunities in lower and higher income neighborhoods.

Authors:  Richard Robert Suminski; Ding Ding; Rebecca Lee; Linda May; Tonya Tota; David Dinius
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Do relationships between environmental attributes and recreational walking vary according to area-level socioeconomic status?

Authors:  Takemi Sugiyama; Natasha J Howard; Catherine Paquet; Neil T Coffee; Anne W Taylor; Mark Daniel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Neighborhood Sociodemographics and Change in Built Infrastructure.

Authors:  Jana A Hirsch; Geoffrey F Green; Marc Peterson; Daniel A Rodriguez; Penny Gordon-Larsen
Journal:  J Urban       Date:  2016-08-10

5.  The geography of recreational open space: influence of neighborhood racial composition and neighborhood poverty.

Authors:  Dustin T Duncan; Ichiro Kawachi; Kellee White; David R Williams
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Disparities in built and natural features of urban parks: comparisons by neighborhood level race/ethnicity and income.

Authors:  Candice M Bruton; Myron F Floyd
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Beyond proximity: the importance of green space useability to self-reported health.

Authors:  May Carter; Pierre Horwitz
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.184

8.  Inequitable walking conditions among older people: examining the interrelationship of neighbourhood socio-economic status and urban form using a comparative case study.

Authors:  Theresa L Grant; Nancy Edwards; Heidi Sveistrup; Caroline Andrew; Mary Egan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Associations between familial affluence and obesity risk behaviours among children.

Authors:  Gavin R McCormack; Penelope Hawe; Rosemary Perry; Anita Blackstaffe
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Greener neighbourhoods, slimmer children? Evidence from 4423 participants aged 6 to 13 years in the Longitudinal Study of Australian children.

Authors:  T Sanders; X Feng; P P Fahey; C Lonsdale; T Astell-Burt
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.