Literature DB >> 27163170

From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education.

Robert B Trelease1.   

Abstract

Until the late-twentieth century, primary anatomical sciences education was relatively unenhanced by advanced technology and dependent on the mainstays of printed textbooks, chalkboard- and photographic projection-based classroom lectures, and cadaver dissection laboratories. But over the past three decades, diffusion of innovations in computer technology transformed the practices of anatomical education and research, along with other aspects of work and daily life. Increasing adoption of first-generation personal computers (PCs) in the 1980s paved the way for the first practical educational applications, and visionary anatomists foresaw the usefulness of computers for teaching. While early computers lacked high-resolution graphics capabilities and interactive user interfaces, applications with video discs demonstrated the practicality of programming digital multimedia linking descriptive text with anatomical imaging. Desktop publishing established that computers could be used for producing enhanced lecture notes, and commercial presentation software made it possible to give lectures using anatomical and medical imaging, as well as animations. Concurrently, computer processing supported the deployment of medical imaging modalities, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, that were subsequently integrated into anatomy instruction. Following its public birth in the mid-1990s, the World Wide Web became the ubiquitous multimedia networking technology underlying the conduct of contemporary education and research. Digital video, structural simulations, and mobile devices have been more recently applied to education. Progressive implementation of computer-based learning methods interacted with waves of ongoing curricular change, and such technologies have been deemed crucial for continuing medical education reforms, providing new challenges and opportunities for anatomical sciences educators. Anat Sci Educ 9: 583-602.
© 2016 American Association of Anatomists. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  3D imaging techniques; e-learning; gross anatomy education; historical perspective; medical curriculum; medical education; medical imaging; modeling; review; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27163170     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  28 in total

1.  TEL Methods Used for the Learning of Clinical Neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Ahmad Elmansouri; Olivia Murray; Samuel Hall; Scott Border
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  An Attitudinal Survey of Undergraduate Neuroscience Students Regarding Their Views on the Relevance of Lectures to their Education.

Authors:  Gerard W O'Keeffe; Aideen M Sullivan; Marian M McCarthy
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  3D Models of Female Pelvis Structures Reconstructed and Represented in Combination with Anatomical and Radiological Sections.

Authors:  L Asensio Romero; M Asensio Gómez; A Prats-Galino; J A Juanes Méndez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  From CT to 3D Printed Models, Serious Gaming, and Virtual Reality: Framework for Educational 3D Visualization of Complex Anatomical Spaces From Within-the Pterygopalatine Fossa.

Authors:  Ramin Javan; Aditya Rao; Bryan S Jeun; Aalap Herur-Raman; Neha Singh; Parisa Heidari
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching.

Authors:  Alistair Robson; Yarrow Scantling-Birch; Stuart Morton; Deepika Anbu; Scott Border
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Teaching with Cadavers Outside of the Dissection Room Using Cadaveric Videos.

Authors:  Danya Stone; Catherine M Hennessy; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Does an Additional Online Anatomy Course Improve Performance of Medical Students on Gross Anatomy Examinations?

Authors:  Ana Yoe-Cheng Chang Chan; Eugene J F M Custers; Maarten Simon van Leeuwen; Ronald L A W Bleys; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-05-30

8.  Is a Three-Dimensional Printing Model Better Than a Traditional Cardiac Model for Medical Education? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Zhongmin Wang; Yuhao Liu; Hongxing Luo; Chuanyu Gao; Jing Zhang; Yuya Dai
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.672

9.  The Satisfaction Level of Undergraduate Medical and Nursing Students Regarding Distant Preclinical and Clinical Teaching Amidst COVID-19 Across India.

Authors:  Siddhartha Dutta; Sneha Ambwani; Hina Lal; Kishna Ram; Govind Mishra; Tarun Kumar; Shoban Babu Varthya
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-02-02

10.  Digital Feast and Physical Famine: The Altered Ecosystem of Anatomy Education due to the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Yvonne M Baptiste
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 6.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.