α-2,9-Polysialic acid is an important capsular polysaccharide expressed by serotype C Neisseria meningitidis. Its protein conjugates are current vaccines against group C meningitis. To address some concerns about traditional protein conjugate vaccines, a new type of fully synthetic vaccines composed of oligosialic acids and glycolipids was explored. In this regard, α-2,9-linked di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentasialic acids were prepared and conjugated with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA). Immunological studies of the conjugates in C57BL/6J mouse revealed that they alone elicited robust immune responses comparable to that induced by corresponding protein conjugates plus adjuvant, suggesting the self-adjuvanting properties of MPLA conjugates. The elicited antibodies were mainly IgG2b and IgG2c, suggesting T cell dependent immunities. The antisera had strong and specific binding to α-2,9-oligosialic acids and to group C meningococcal polysaccharide and cell, indicating the ability of antibodies to selectively target the bacteria. The antisera also mediated strong bactericidal activities. Structure-activity relationship analysis of the MPLA conjugates also revealed that the immunogenicity of oligosialic acids decreased with elongated sugar chain, but all tested MPLA conjugates elicited robust immune responses. It is concluded that tri- and tetrasialic acid-MPLA conjugates are worthy of further investigation as the first fully synthetic and self-adjuvanting vaccines against group C meningitis.
α-2,9-Polysialic acid is an important capsular polysaccharide expressed by serotype C Neisseria meningitidis. Its protein conjugates are current vaccines against group C meningitis. To address some concerns about traditional protein conjugate vaccines, a new type of fully synthetic vaccines composed of oligosialic acids and glycolipids was explored. In this regard, α-2,9-linked di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentasialic acids were prepared and conjugated with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA). Immunological studies of the conjugates in C57BL/6J mouse revealed that they alone elicited robust immune responses comparable to that induced by corresponding protein conjugates plus adjuvant, suggesting the self-adjuvanting properties of MPLA conjugates. The elicited antibodies were mainly IgG2b and IgG2c, suggesting T cell dependent immunities. The antisera had strong and specific binding to α-2,9-oligosialic acids and to group C meningococcalpolysaccharide and cell, indicating the ability of antibodies to selectively target the bacteria. The antisera also mediated strong bactericidal activities. Structure-activity relationship analysis of the MPLA conjugates also revealed that the immunogenicity of oligosialic acids decreased with elongated sugar chain, but all tested MPLA conjugates elicited robust immune responses. It is concluded that tri- and tetrasialic acid-MPLA conjugates are worthy of further investigation as the first fully synthetic and self-adjuvanting vaccines against group C meningitis.
With the rapid growth in drug resistance,
bacterial infections
have again become a major threat to human health.[1] For infectious disease control, vaccination is considered
an effective strategy.[1−8] When it comes to antibacterial vaccine development, the abundant,
exposed, and conserved capsular polysaccharides (CPSs) on the bacterial
cell surface are valuable antigens.[9,10] However, carbohydrates
are usually weakly immunogenic and T cell independent,[11,12] thus they have to be covalently linked to an immunologically active
carrier to become T cell dependent.[13−15] In recent decades, antibacterial
vaccines composed of polysaccharides and proteins have witnessed great
success, and their clinic use has kept many infectious diseases under
control.[16,17]Despite the great success of polysaccharide–protein
conjugate
vaccines, they have inherent problems. First, the polysaccharides
utilized to create vaccines are derived from bacteria and are thus
heterogeneous and easily contaminated.[15,17] Moreover,
in order to promote the conjugation with protein, CPSs have to be
modified, making their composition more complex. To address the issue,
structurally defined repeating units of CPSs have been explored for
antibacterial vaccine development.[18,19] An example
of this approach’s success is the oligosaccharide-based Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine now in clinical use.[20] Second, carbohydrate–protein conjugation
usually affords complex mixtures that are difficult to control and
duplicate. Third, carrier proteins can elicit strong B cell responses
that may suppress the desired immune responses to carbohydrate antigens.[21,22] A promising strategy to overcome these problems is to employ fully
synthetic vaccines,[1,16,23−28] which not only are homogeneous, structurally defined, and easy-to-control
but also are free of bacterial contamination.To facilitate
fully synthetic glycoconjugate vaccine development,
we have recently explored a new carrier, i.e., monophosphoryllipid
A (MPLA):[29,30] a lipid A derivative. Like lipid A, MPLA
is a strong immunostimulant that can interact with toll-like receptor
4 (TLR-4) to promote antigen presentation, T-helper cell activation,
and T cell mediated immune response.[31−35] In contrast to lipid A, however, MPLA is essentially
nontoxic and thus has been approved as a human vaccine adjuvant.[33,36] We have studied several MPLA-based anticancer vaccines that were
proved to be self-adjuvanting and to elicit robust T cell dependent
immunity.[29,30,37,38] Based on these findings, we envisioned the potential
application of MPLA to create fully synthetic antibacterial vaccines.
To probe this hypothesis, a CPS of serotype C N. meningitidis(39,40) was utilized as the target antigen to develop anti-group
C meningitis vaccines. In addition, this research also provides in-depth
analysis of the structure–activity relationships of oligosaccharide
antigens.
Results and Discussion
Group C N. meningitidis is one of the two bacterial
strains mainly responsible for meningitis epidemics in developed countries.[7,41] α-2,9-Polysialic acid is its characteristic CSP,[39,40] which has been used to develop successful vaccines against group
C meningitis[42−44] and is still a hot target for new vaccine design.[45−47] Accordingly, we prepared a series of α-2,9-oligosialic acids,
including di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentasialic acids, conjugated them
with MPLAs–the 4′-O-phosphoryl form
of N. meningitidis lipid A (1–4, Figure ) and its analogue without the hydroxyl groups on the lipid side
chains (5)—and studied the resultant conjugates
in mice. These oligosialic acids were also linked to keyhole limpet
hemocyanin (KLH) and humanserum albumin (HSA) to obtain conjugates
that were utilized as the positive control and as capture reagents
for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of oligosialic acid
specific antibodies, respectively.
Figure 1
Structures of designed MPLA–oligosialic
acid conjugates 1–5.
Structures of designed MPLA–oligosialic
acid conjugates 1–5.
Synthesis of Glycoconjugates 1–5
As outlined in Scheme , MPLA derivatives 6 and 7 with a free carboxylic group[38] and oligosialic
acids 10–13 carrying a free amino
group at the reducing end[48] were prepared
according to reported procedures. Then, 6 and 7 were converted into active esters 8 and 9, which were coupled with 10–13 to
afford 14–18. Finally, 14–18 were subjected to catalytic hydrogenolysis
under an H2 atmosphere to remove all of the benzyl groups
to yield 1–5. On the other hand,
the KLH and HSA conjugates of oligosialic acids were prepared by coupling 10–13 with KLH and HSA, respectively,
via the bifunctional glutaryl (Supporting Information), as described before.[48]
Scheme 1
Synthesis
of the Target MPLA–Oligosialic Acid Conjugates 1–5
Immunologic Evaluation of Glycoconjugates 1–5
Immunologic studies of 1–5 were carried out with female C57BL/6J mice using liposomes
of 1–5 made with 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC) and cholesterol in a
10:65:50 molar ratio.[37,38] Liposomes are expected to improve
the water solubility of 1–5 and their
presentation to immune cells.[49,50] The immunization protocol
was to subcutaneously (sc) inject each conjugate (9 μg of sugar)
to a group of five mice, with or without an external adjuvant, on
days 1, 14, 21, and 28, respectively. The mice were bled on day 0
before initial immunization and on day 27 and day 38 after boost immunizations.
Blood samples were used to prepare antisera for ELISA detection of
oligosialic acid specific antibodies with oligosialic acid–HSA
conjugates as capture reagents. Antibody titer was calculated by linear
regression analysis of adjusted optical density (OD) values, i.e.,
after deduction of the OD values of day 0 mouse sera, against serum
dilution numbers in logarithmic scale and was defined as the dilution
number yielding an adjusted OD value of 0.20.
Influence of External Adjuvant
on the Immune Response to 1
Our previous studies
showed the self-adjuvanting
properties of MPLA conjugates.[37,38] However, all clinical
vaccines are currently used with adjuvants, so we sought to probe
the influence of an external adjuvant on the immunologic properties
of MPLA-based antibacterial vaccines. We examined 1 alone
or 1 with complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA), alum,
or TiterMax Gold adjuvant. Antisera were prepared from blood samples
collected 10 days after the last boost immunization and analyzed by
ELISA with disialic acid–HSA as the capture reagent. As depicted
in Figure , all four
groups of mice exhibited similar immunologic responses, with the production
of high total and IgG2b antibody titers and moderate IgG2c, IgM, and
IgG3 antibody titers. Thus, the external adjuvants had no or little
impact on the immunologic responses to 1. According to
the literature,[11,51,52] IgG antibody production is associated with T cell dependent immunity.
Therefore, 1 was proved to be self-adjuvanting and elicit
robust, antigen-specific T cell dependent immune responses in mice.
Figure 2
ELISA
results of disialic acid specific total (anti-kappa), IgG1,
IgG2b, IgG2c, IgG3, and IgM antibodies elicited by liposomes of 1 alone or in combination with an adjuvant, including CFA,
alum, and TiterMax Gold adjuvant. The error bar represents the standard
error of three parallel experiments.
ELISA
results of disialic acid specific total (anti-kappa), IgG1,
IgG2b, IgG2c, IgG3, and IgM antibodies elicited by liposomes of 1 alone or in combination with an adjuvant, including CFA,
alum, and TiterMax Gold adjuvant. The error bar represents the standard
error of three parallel experiments.
Impact of Vaccine Dose on the Immune Response to 1
To study the dose–immunity correlation, three groups
of mice were immunized with liposomes of 1 containing
1, 9, and 18 μg of disialic acid per injection, respectively.
The titers of total and isotypes of antibodies detected by ELISA (Figure ) showed that the
vaccine dose had a small impact on the immune response and mice in
the 9 μg dose group had the highest titers of all tested antibody
isotypes. However, high total and IgG2b antibody and moderate IgG2c,
IgM, and IgG3 antibody levels were observed with all dose groups,
and the dose did not have an obvious impact on antibody isotypes.
It seemed that a low dose of 1, e.g., 1 μg of sialic
acid per injection, was sufficient to elicit a robust immune response.
Thus, although higher doses may help enhance the immune response,
exceedingly high doses are not necessarily beneficial.
Figure 3
ELISA results of the
titers of various disialic acid specific antibodies
in the day 38 pooled antisera of 1 injected in doses
of 1, 9, and 18 μg of carbohydrate antigen/mouse. The error
bar represents the standard error of three parallel experiments.
ELISA results of the
titers of various disialic acid specific antibodies
in the day 38 pooled antisera of 1 injected in doses
of 1, 9, and 18 μg of carbohydrate antigen/mouse. The error
bar represents the standard error of three parallel experiments.
Comparing the Immunologic
Properties of MPLA and KLH Conjugates
Mice were immunized
with liposomes of 1 alone (9 μg
of sialic acid/injection) or with a KLH–disialic acid–TiterMax
Gold Adjuvant emulsion (6 μg of sialic acid/injection).[53,54] ELISA results of their antisera revealed that both conjugates elicited
strong and a similar pattern of antibody response, mainly IgG2b and
IgG2c and some IgG1 and IgG3 (Figure ). Moreover, compared to KLH conjugate, 1 elicited a slightly lower IgG1 antibody titer but a higher IgG3
antibody titer. The results were consistent with the observation[37,38,48] that glycoproteins often elicit
IgG1 antibody response whereas glycolipids elicit carbohydrate-specific
IgG3 antibody response. Most significantly, both 1 and
KLH–disialic acid elicited high titers of IgG2b and IgG2c antibodies,
indicating T cell dependent immunity.[11,27,51,52] Thus, these studies
further verified that 1 alone could elicit robust immune
responses comparable to that elicited by the corresponding KLH conjugate
plus adjuvants.
Figure 4
ELISA results of the titers of various disialic acid specific
antibodies
in the pooled antisera of disialic acid–MPLA conjugate 1 and disialic acid–KLH conjugate. Error bar represents
the standard error of three parallel experiments.
ELISA results of the titers of various disialic acid specific
antibodies
in the pooled antisera of disialic acid–MPLA conjugate 1 and disialic acid–KLH conjugate. Error bar represents
the standard error of three parallel experiments.
Structure–Immunogenicity Relationships of Oligosialic
Acid Antigens
Mouse immunization and ELISA were carried out
by aforementioned protocols. As shown in Figure , all of the conjugates 1–5 elicited strong immune responses, revealed by high total
antibody titers, and IgG2b was the major antibody subclass, indicating
T cell dependent immunity.[11,27,51,52] Moreover, antibody titers for 1–4 decreased progressively with sugar
chain elongation, suggesting that shorter oligosialic acids were overall
better immunogens than longer ones. Nevertheless, the IgG2b antibody
titer for 4 was still high. In addition, 5 and 3, which have the same oligosialic acid but different
MPLA, gave different total antibody titers (Figures C, 5E), indicating
the impact of MPLA structure on the immunogenicity of these conjugates.
However, the IgG2b antibody titers for 5 and 3 were only slightly different (<2-fold), thus 5 could
still elicit strong T cell dependent immunity.
Figure 5
ELISA results of the
day 38 antisera of 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), 4 (D), and 5 (E). Each dot represents
the antibody titer of an individual mouse,
and each black bar represents the average titer for each group.
ELISA results of the
day 38 antisera of 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), 4 (D), and 5 (E). Each dot represents
the antibody titer of an individual mouse,
and each black bar represents the average titer for each group.
Cross-Reactivity of Each
Antiserum with All Other Oligosialic
Acids
Cross-reactions between the antisera of 1–4 and all synthetic oligosialic acids were assessed
by ELISA. As shown in Figure A, antiserum 1 had strong reactions with disialic
acid, but its reactivity with other oligosialic acids decreased significantly:
di- > tri- > tetra- > pentasaccharide. Thus, a portion of
antibodies
elicited by 1 was probably specific to disialic acid,
not reactive with longer oligosialic acids. A potential explanation
was that the conformation of disialic acid in 1 was affected
by the carrier molecule to result in antibodies that could only recognize
specific conformers. Antiserum 2 had a similar decreasing
binding trend but to a lesser intensity. In contrast, antisera 3 and 4 had essentially the same reactivity with
all oligosialic acids. Moreover, we discovered that the antisera did
not react with other sialic acid containing antigens, such as GM3,
sTn, and α-2,8-polysialic acid.[48] Thus, the majority of antibodies elicited by 2–4 should recognize a common and specific antigenic epitope,
that is, α-2,9-linked sialic acids.
Figure 6
ELISA results of the
cross-reactions of normal mouse serum (NS)
and pooled antisera of 1–4 with (A)
di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentasialic acids and (B) the CPS of group
C N. meningitidis. The error bar represents the standard
error of three parallel experiments.
ELISA results of the
cross-reactions of normal mouse serum (NS)
and pooled antisera of 1–4 with (A)
di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentasialic acids and (B) the CPS of group
C N. meningitidis. The error bar represents the standard
error of three parallel experiments.
Reactivity of the Antisera with α-2,9-Polysialic Acid,
the Natural CPS of Group C N. meningitidis
As revealed by the ELISA results (Figure B), all of the antisera 1–4 had strong reactions with the natural CPS of group C N. meningitidis. Antisera 2–4 had similar reactivity and their antibody titers were comparable
to that of the reaction with corresponding oligosialic acids, but
antiserum 1 exhibited decreased reactivity with the CPS.
Nonetheless, the reaction of 1 was still strong, indicating
that a significant portion of the antibodies elicited by 1 could recognize and bind to the CPS. Through a competitive ELISA
experiment we have also demonstrated that the bacterial CPS could
inhibit antibody binding to oligosialic acids (Supporting Information), further verifying the specific binding
of elicited antibodies to the natural antigen.
Binding between
Antisera and N. meningitidis Cell
These
assays were carried out using a Bio-Dot microfiltration
apparatus equipped with a PVDF membrane. Prefixed N. meningitidis cells were incubated with antisera 1–4 and then an alkaline phosphatase (AP) conjugated antibody, and finally
examined at 405 nm wavelength. The results (Figure A) revealed that antibodies in the antisera
could recognize and bind to the bacterial cell, as shown by the fluorescent
images of cells treated with antisera and FITC-labeled anti-kappa
antibody (Figures B–7F). Interestingly, antiserum 1, which exhibited the highest total antibody titer, had significantly
weaker binding as compared to antisera 2–4. Thus, at least a portion of antibodies elicited by 1 did not bind to α-2,9-polysialic acid on the bacterial
cell, which is consistent with conclusions of the cross-reactivity
assays (Figure ).
Overall, the binding of antisera 2–4 to bacterial cells mirrored the ELISA results (Figure ). Despite the decreased binding
at high dilution numbers, this effect was still significant at 1:800
(Supporting Information). Moreover, similar
to our previous discovery,[48] antisera 1–4 did not have obvious binding to cancer
cells expressing other sialoglycans than α-2,9-polysialic acids
(Supporting Information). These results
have verified that antibodies elicited by 1–4 could recognize and target specifically group C N. meningitidis cell. Collectively these data suggest that 1–4 and especially 2–4 can be functional vaccines.
Figure 7
(A) Results of the binding between N. meningitidis cell and pooled day 38 antisera of 1–4, with normal mouse sera (NS) as negative
controls. All of the mouse
sera were 1:100 diluted. Error bars show the standard errors of three
parallel experiments. The differences between NS and all antisera
of 1–4 were statistically significant
(P < 0.05). (B–F) Fluorescent images of N. meningitidis cells stained with NS (B) or with the antisera
of 1 (C), 2 (D), 3 (E), and 4 (F). The white reference bar is 5 μm.
(A) Results of the binding between N. meningitidis cell and pooled day 38 antisera of 1–4, with normal mouse sera (NS) as negative
controls. All of the mouse
sera were 1:100 diluted. Error bars show the standard errors of three
parallel experiments. The differences between NS and all antisera
of 1–4 were statistically significant
(P < 0.05). (B–F) Fluorescent images of N. meningitidis cells stained with NS (B) or with the antisera
of 1 (C), 2 (D), 3 (E), and 4 (F). The white reference bar is 5 μm.
Bactericidal Activity of Antisera 1–4 to N. meningitidis Cell
In this
study, bacteria were incubated with serially diluted normal mouse
serum or the antisera of 1–4, respectively,
in the presence of rabbit complements. The number of surviving bacteria
were then counted after culture on agar plates. As depicted in Figure , all of the antisera
mediated strong, serum concentration dependent toxicity to the bacterial
cell. At a 1:2 dilution >98% of the bacterial cells were killed
by
the antisera, while the dilution number for 50% killing was ca. 1:8
for all antisera. These results provided strong evidence for the synthetic
vaccines to elicit protective immunities against group C meningitis.
It was interesting to note that all of the antisera exhibited similar
bactericidal activity despite the lower CPS-binding capability of
antiserum 1 compared to other antisera, suggesting that
antibacterial vaccines are protective so long as they provoke the
proper and robust antibody responses.[14,42]
Figure 8
Results of
bactericidal assays using normal mouse serum (NS) and
pooled antisera of 1–4. The error
bar represents the standard error of three parallel experiments.
Results of
bactericidal assays using normal mouse serum (NS) and
pooled antisera of 1–4. The error
bar represents the standard error of three parallel experiments.
Conclusion
Two
series of MPLA conjugates of α-2,9-linked oligosialic
acids were prepared and evaluated as fully synthetic vaccines. These
structurally defined conjugates enabled in-depth immunological studies
and the use of structure–activity relationship analysis to
help identify proper α-2,9-oligosialic acid antigens and MPLA
conjugates for anti-group C meningitis vaccine development.Immunological studies on α-2,9-oligosialic acid-MPLA conjugates 1–4 showed that they alone elicited high
total and IgG antibody titers, verifying their self-adjuvanting property.
Conjugates 1–4 were used as liposomes
prepared with phosphatidylcholine (PC) and cholesterol to improve
their water solubility and to create homogeneous formulations. Although
liposomes could improve the immunogenicity of conjugate vaccines[49,50] and negatively charged liposomes consisting of PC, cholesterol,
and diacetylphosphate were found to have adjuvant activity,[55] liposomes consisting of PC and cholesterol did
not have adjuvant activity.[55] Thus, the
adjuvant activity of 1–4 was due
to MPLA. In addition, Boons and co-workers[56,57] showed that glycoconjugates made of immunosilent lipopeptides, instead
of TLR agonists, did not elicit robust IgG antibody responses, and
we found that conjugates made of protected MPLA were immunologically
inactive.[37] The MPLA structure was also
demonstrated to have a significant impact on the immunogenicity of
these conjugates. For example, the immune response to 3 was stronger than that to 5 carrying the same oligosialic
acid but a different MPLA. Our detailed analysis of cytokine and chemokine
releases induced by similar MPLA conjugates[58] provided further support that the self-adjuvanting activity of 1–4 was due to the TLR agonist property
of MPLA.We have shown that the vaccine dose used for immunization
had only
a small impact on the immune response. Among the tested doses for 1 (1, 9, and 18 μg/mouse), the 9 μg group had
the highest titers of total and various isotypes of antibodies. Nonetheless,
mice in all the dose groups exhibited a robust and similar pattern
of immune responses.Structure–activity relationship
studies on 1–4 revealed the difference
of oligosialic acids
in their immunogenicity, which decreased with sugar chain elongation
from di- to pentasialic acids. Thus, 1 induced the highest
titers of antigen-specific total and IgG2b antibodies. However, some
of the antibodies elicited by 1 bound to disialic acid
but not to other oligosialic acids or bacterial CPS. On the other
hand, antibodies induced by 2–4 could
recognize and react with all oligosialic acids and the CPS and antiserum 2 exhibited the highest binding to bacterial cells. Despite
the fact that the titers of antibodies induced by 1–4 decreased as the sugar chain was elongated and that some
of the antibodies elicited by 1 did not bind to the CPS, 1 and 4 elicited robust immune responses and
sufficient antibodies that could effectively recognize and bind to
the bacterial cell.More importantly, 1 and corresponding
KLH conjugate
elicited a strong and similar pattern of immune responses, namely,
both mainly inducing IgG2b, IgG2c, and some IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies.
Similar antibody responses were also observed with other MPLA conjugates.
Robust IgG antibody response indicates T cell dependent immunity,
meaning desirable antibody affinity maturation, better antibody-mediated
cell and complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and long-term immunologic
memory.[11,27,51,52] IgG antibody subclasses are defined according to
their Fc regions and differ in their ability to activate the immune
system, and their activity hierarchy is IgG2a ∼ IgG2b >
IgG1
≫ IgG3.[59] C57BL/6J mouse does not
have IgG2a gene but expresses the allelic IgG2c antibody.[60,61] In addition, among various IgG antibody subclasses, IgG2b is the
most potent for effector response activation and antimicrobial immunity.[11,27,51,52] The induction of high levels of IgG antibody, especially IgG2b and
IgG2c, by 1–4 suggested their great
potential as protective vaccines against group C meningitis,[62,63] which was eventually verified by the strong bactericidal activities
observed with their antisera.In conclusion, we have demonstrated
in this work that oligosialic
acid–MPLA conjugates 1–5 were
self-adjuvanting, which alone elicited strong T cell dependent immunity
comparable to that induced by corresponding KLH conjugates. Especially, 2 and 3 elicited robust immune responses and
high titers of antibodies that mediated effective killing of group
C N. meningitidis cell. This conclusion agrees well
with that of a study on oligosialic acid–KLH conjugates.[48] However, as aforementioned, fully synthetic
vaccines with defined structures have a number of advantages over
conventional carbohydrate–protein conjugates. Thus, 2 and 3 were identified as promising anti-group C meningitis
vaccines worthy of further investigation.
Experimental Section
Vaccine
Formulation
Liposomes of 1–5 were prepared by a previously reported protocol.[37,38] After a conjugate (0.42 μmol), DSPC (2.15 mg, 2.7 μmol),
and cholesterol (0.81 mg, 2.1 μmol) in 10:65:50 molar ratio
were dissolved in a mixture of CH2Cl2, MeOH,
and H2O (3:3:1, v/v, 2 mL), solvents were removed under
reduced pressure via rotary evaporation, which created a thin lipid
film on the vial wall. This film was hydrated in HEPES buffer (20
mM, pH 7.5, 3.0 mL) containing 150 mM of NaCl in a water bath at 60
°C. The mixture was shaken on a vortex mixer and then sonicated
for 20 min to generate liposomes used for immunization. The size of
these liposomes was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurement,
and the average diameter was about 1500 nm with a polydispersity index
(PDI) of around 0.60.CFA, alum, and TiterMax Gold Adjuvant
emulsions of vaccines were obtained by thoroughly mixing the liposomes
of 1 (0.75 mL) or KLH–disialic acid with an adjuvant
(0.75 mL), according to the manufacturer’s instruction.[53]
Immunization of Mouse
Each group
of five mice was inoculated
via subcutaneous (sc) injection of a liposome of 1–5 (0.1 mL) on day 1 for initial immunization. In the CFA,
alum, and TiterMax groups, mice were inoculated via intramuscular
(im) injection of an emulsion of the adjuvant and a specific conjugate
(0.1 mL). After initial immunization, mice were boosted 3 times on
days 14, 21, and 28 by injection of the same conjugate (0.1 mL). Antisera
were prepared from blood samples collected via the mouse leg veins
prior to initial immunization on day 0 and after immunization on days
28 and 38. Antisera were stored at −80 °C before immunologic
assays.
ELISA[38]
ELISA plates were
coated with a specific oligosialic acid–HSA conjugate (100
μL, 2 μg of sialic acid/mL) dissolved in the coating buffer
(0.1 M bicarbonate, pH 9.6) at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing 3
times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween-20
(PBST), the plates were treated with a blocking buffer [10% bovineserum albumin (BSA) in PBST] at rt for 1 h. Then, a pooled or an individual
mouse antiserum (100 μL) with serial half-log dilutions from
1:300 to 1:656100 in PBS was added, which was followed by incubation
at 37 °C for 2 h. The plates were washed with PBST and incubated
at rt for 1 h with 1:1000 diluted solution (100 μL/well) of
AP-coupled goat anti-mouse kappa, IgM, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c, and IgG3
antibodies, respectively. The plates were washed with PBST and then
treated with a p-nitrophenylphosphate (PNPP) buffer
(100 μL, 1.67 mg/mL) at rt for 30 min. Finally, the plates were
examined at 405 nm wavelength. The OD values after deducting background
OD of the day 0 sera were plotted against dilution numbers, and the
best-fit equation was obtained for each set of data and used to calculate
the antibody titer, defined as the dilution number giving an adjusted
OD value of 0.20.
Antiserum Binding to N. meningitidis Cell
A modified protocol for ELISA using a Bio-Dot microfiltration
apparatus[48] was used to assess antiserum
binding to the
bacterial cell. Briefly, the PVDF membrane was pretreated in the blocking
buffer (1% BSA in PBST) and then set on the apparatus. A suspension
of killed N. meningitidis (ATCC 31275) cells in PBS
(50 μL, OD 0.2 at 600 nm) was added. After PBS buffer was removed
through filtration, the bacterial cells remaining in the wells were
incubated with the same blocking buffer (200 μL) at rt for 1
h to mask any nonspecific binding sites on the bacterial cell, and
the blocking buffer was removed through filtration under vacuum. The
plate was washed with PBST (350 μL) 3 times, followed by addition
of 100 μL of normal mouse serum or pooled antisera (1:100 dilution
in PBS) of 1–4. The plate was incubated
at 37 °C for 2 h and washed 6 times with PBST (350 μL).
To each well was added 1:1000 diluted AP-conjugated goat anti-mouse
kappa antibody solution (100 μL/well), and the plate was incubated
at rt for 1 h. Finally, the plate was washed with PBST 6 times and
developed with a PNPP solution (1.67 mg/mL in buffer, 200 μL)
at rt for 30 min. An aliquot of the solution (100 μL) in each
well was transferred into a clear, round-bottom 96-well plate for
colorimetric readout at 405 nm wavelength. The binding between antibodies
and the cell was reflected by the observed OD value.For cell
imaging, a suspension of killed N. meningitidis cells
was smeared on IF microscope slides. The slides were dried, washed
with PBST, and then treated with 3% FBS blocking buffer at 37 °C
for 1 h. After washing, the slides were incubated with normal mouse
serum or a 1:10 diluted antiserum at 37 °C for 2 h. The slides
were washed with PBST and treated with FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse
kappa antibody at rt for 30 min. The slides were washed and mounted
with the fluoromount aqueous mounting medium. The cell images were
obtained with a Zeiss ApoTome Imaging System using a 100×/1.30
oil objective lens.
Bactericidal Assays of the Antisera
The protocol was
similar to that reported in the literature.[14] A −80 °C stock culture of serogroup C N. meningitidis (ATCC 31275) was streaked and incubated in #953 broth at 37 °C
for 6 h. Thereafter, the bacterial cells were suspended in #953 broth
and adjusted to a concentration of 105 cfu/mL. The bacterial
suspension (20 μL, 2000 cfu) was mixed and incubated with 2-fold
serially diluted (1:2 to 1:16) normal mouse serum or pooled day 38
antiserum of 1–4 (10 μL) at
37 °C for 15 min. In the meantime, a mixture of #953 broth (10
μL) and bacterial suspension (20 μL) was set as the complement-only
control. After incubation, 50 μL of rabbit complement (1:1 diluted
in #953 broth) was added, followed by incubation at 37 °C for
1 h. Finally, 6 μL of the mixture was spread on the #953 agar
plates. After 36 h of culture, the number of surviving bacteria in
each sample was counted.
Authors: Anna Bernardi; Jesus Jiménez-Barbero; Alessandro Casnati; Cristina De Castro; Tamis Darbre; Franck Fieschi; Jukka Finne; Horst Funken; Karl-Erich Jaeger; Martina Lahmann; Thisbe K Lindhorst; Marco Marradi; Paul Messner; Antonio Molinaro; Paul V Murphy; Cristina Nativi; Stefan Oscarson; Soledad Penadés; Francesco Peri; Roland J Pieters; Olivier Renaudet; Jean-Louis Reymond; Barbara Richichi; Javier Rojo; Francesco Sansone; Christina Schäffer; W Bruce Turnbull; Trinidad Velasco-Torrijos; Sébastien Vidal; Stéphane Vincent; Tom Wennekes; Han Zuilhof; Anne Imberty Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Marko Anderluh; Francesco Berti; Anna Bzducha-Wróbel; Fabrizio Chiodo; Cinzia Colombo; Federica Compostella; Katarzyna Durlik; Xhenti Ferhati; Rikard Holmdahl; Dragana Jovanovic; Wieslaw Kaca; Luigi Lay; Milena Marinovic-Cincovic; Marco Marradi; Musa Ozil; Laura Polito; Josè Juan Reina; Celso A Reis; Robert Sackstein; Alba Silipo; Urban Švajger; Ondřej Vaněk; Fumiichiro Yamamoto; Barbara Richichi; Sandra J van Vliet Journal: FEBS J Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 5.622
Authors: Osama I Alwassil; Sandeep Chandrashekharappa; Susanta K Nayak; Katharigatta N Venugopala Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240