Literature DB >> 27163043

A Direct Grain-Boundary-Activity Correlation for CO Electroreduction on Cu Nanoparticles.

Xiaofeng Feng1, Kaili Jiang2, Shoushan Fan2, Matthew W Kanan1.   

Abstract

Copper catalyzes the electrochemical reduction of CO to valuable C2+ products including ethanol, acetate, propanol, and ethylene. These reactions could be very useful for converting renewable energy into fuels and chemicals, but conventional Cu electrodes are energetically inefficient and have poor selectivity for CO vs H2O reduction. Efforts to design improved catalysts have been impeded by the lack of experimentally validated, quantitative structure-activity relationships. Here we show that CO reduction activity is directly correlated to the density of grain boundaries (GBs) in Cu nanoparticles (NPs). We prepared electrodes of Cu NPs on carbon nanotubes (Cu/CNT) with different average GB densities quantified by transmission electron microscopy. At potentials ranging from -0.3 V to -0.5 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode, the specific activity for CO reduction to ethanol and acetate was linearly proportional to the fraction of NP surfaces comprised of GB surface terminations. Our results provide a design principle for CO reduction to ethanol and acetate on Cu. GB-rich Cu/CNT electrodes are the first NP catalysts with significant CO reduction activity at moderate overpotential, reaching a mass activity of up to ∼1.5 A per gram of Cu and a Faradaic efficiency >70% at -0.3 V.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27163043      PMCID: PMC4827560          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

Using renewable energy to power the reduction of CO2 into fuels and chemicals is a possible value-added alternative to sequestration for mitigating CO2 emissions.[1−4] Substantial progress has been made for the electrochemical conversion of CO2 to CO; high temperature solid oxide cells catalyze this reaction at high current densities near the thermodynamic potential,[5] and new catalysts have enabled CO production in ambient-temperature cells at modest overpotentials.[6−14] Leveraging these advances requires efficient catalysts that further reduce CO to make energy-dense, high value chemicals and fuels. Cu is the only material known to have appreciable activity for electrochemical CO reduction to high-value products including ethanol, acetate, and propanol.[15,16] Unfortunately, conventional Cu electrodes such as foils and commercial nanoparticles (NPs) have low specific activity (activity per Cu surface area) and low selectivity for CO reduction vs H2O reduction unless large overpotentials are applied. Large overpotentials result in low energy conversion efficiency and favor hydrocarbon products over liquid oxygenates. Making CO reduction practical requires drastically improving the catalytic properties of Cu and translating these improvements to NPs to minimize catalyst loading. The equilibrium potentials for CO reduction to hydrocarbons and oxygenates are all >0 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (all potentials here are reported with respect to this reference). Early electrolysis studies showed that polycrystalline Cu electrodes reduce CO to a mixture of hydrocarbons and oxygenates with a combined Faradaic efficiency of ∼50% at < −0.9 V vs RHE (>1 V overpotential) in aqueous electrolytes.[15,16] Recent studies have examined polycrystalline and single-crystal Cu electrodes for CO reduction in sweep voltammetry at a wide range of potentials.[17−19] These studies have shown that Cu(111) electrodes do not reduce CO at potentials ≥ −1 V. By contrast, single-crystal Cu(100) electrodes show transient activity for CO reduction to ethylene from −0.3 V to −0.5 V.[17] However, sustained activity in bulk electrolysis has not been demonstrated for Cu(100) electrodes in this potential range. We recently showed that Cu films prepared from Cu oxide precursors (“oxide-derived Cu”) have enhanced specific CO reduction activity and suppressed specific H2O reduction activity at moderate overpotential compared to other known Cu electrodes. At only −0.3 V, oxide-derived Cu reduces CO to ethanol and acetate with up to 57% Faradaic efficiency in sustained bulk electrolysis.[20−22] Oxide-derived Cu is a continuous metal film composed of 10–100 nm crystallites linked by grain boundaries (GBs), which suggests that the GBs may be responsible for its unusual catalytic properties.[23] Quantifying the role of GBs in Cu-catalyzed CO reduction is essential for establishing a firm design principle, but it is difficult to quantify and modulate GBs in oxide-derived metals. It is also unclear if the factors that promote activity for a metallic film will be applicable to NPs, which are essential for electrolytic applications because of their high surface-area-to-mass ratios. We recently used vapor deposition and thermal annealing to prepare Au NPs on CNTs with different GB densities and showed that the activity for CO2 reduction to CO was correlated with the coverage of GB surface terminations.[24] Using a similar strategy, here we show that GBs engender high activity for CO reduction on Cu, a more difficult and potentially more enabling transformation.

Results and Discussion

Cu/CNT samples were prepared by depositing Cu at a nominal thickness of 10 nm onto a film of superaligned CNTs[25,26] using e-beam evaporation (Figure S1). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the material showed the expected signals for C, Cu, and O (Figure S2). The Cu peaks indicated a mixture of Cu0 and Cu1+, the latter the result of Cu2O formation from air exposure. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that the CNTs were decorated with Cu NPs (Figure a, top). Most of the NPs were composed of multiple Cu crystallites connected by GBs (Figure a, middle and bottom). The average particle size was 16.9 ± 4.0 nm (Table and Figure S3). To quantify the GBs, high-resolution TEM images were obtained for 200 NPs (Figure S4). For each NP image, the length of GBs and the particle area were measured. The GB quantity of interest is the fraction of the NP surfaces that corresponds to GB surface terminations (hereafter this fraction is referred to as the “GB surface density”). Because the TEM images are two-dimensional (2D) projections of three-dimensional (3D) particles, the measured GB lengths and particle areas were converted to GB surface termination lengths and 3D particle surface areas using conversion factors derived from simple geometrical models (see Supporting Information). The GB surface density was taken to be the sum of the GB surface lengths over all of the imaged NPs divided by the sum of the 3D particle surface areas. The value obtained for an as-deposited Cu/CNT sample (Cu/CNT_as-dep) was 40.6 ± 4.3 μm–1. Measuring the GB surface density in this way is sufficient to determine the relative density between samples prepared in different ways to assess its relationship to catalytic activity (see below). Assuming a GB width of 1 nm, the measured GB surface density corresponds to a ∼4% coverage of GB surface terminations.
Figure 1

TEM characterization of Cu nanoparticles in the Cu/CNT electrodes. The five columns are the as-deposited Cu/CNT electrode (a) and the electrodes annealed under N2 at 200 °C (b), 300 °C (c), 400 °C (d), and 500 °C (e). Top row: overview TEM images; middle and bottom rows: representative high-resolution TEM images. The arrows indicate the gain boundaries.

Table 1

Structural Metrics of As-Deposited and Annealed Cu/CNT Electrodesa

sampleparticle size (nm)GB surface density (μm–1)microstrain (%)grain size (nm)surface area (cm2 mg–1)
Cu/CNT_as-dep16.9 ± 4.040.6 ± 4.30.17 ± 0.0210.6218 ± 4
Cu/CNT_20019.5 ± 4.521.7 ± 2.10.10 ± 0.0212.5221 ± 6
Cu/CNT_30022.1 ± 5.313.5 ± 1.20.07 ± 0.0113.9212 ± 5
Cu/CNT_40026.3 ± 6.96.7 ± 0.60.05 ± 0.0115.6187 ± 5
Cu/CNT_50033.6 ± 8.43.1 ± 0.20.02 ± 0.0119.8148 ± 6

Particle size and GB surface density were quantified by TEM. Microstrain and grain size were determined by performing Williamson–Hall analysis of the X-ray diffraction patterns. Surface area was determined by measuring the electrochemical capacitance.

TEM characterization of Cu nanoparticles in the Cu/CNT electrodes. The five columns are the as-deposited Cu/CNT electrode (a) and the electrodes annealed under N2 at 200 °C (b), 300 °C (c), 400 °C (d), and 500 °C (e). Top row: overview TEM images; middle and bottom rows: representative high-resolution TEM images. The arrows indicate the gain boundaries. Particle size and GB surface density were quantified by TEM. Microstrain and grain size were determined by performing Williamson–Hall analysis of the X-ray diffraction patterns. Surface area was determined by measuring the electrochemical capacitance. To change the microstructure of the Cu NPs, Cu/CNT samples were annealed under N2 at 200 °C, 300 °C, 400 °C, or 500 °C (Cu/CNT_200, Cu/CNT_300, Cu/CNT_400, and Cu/CNT_500). As seen by TEM, the number of GBs in the Cu NPs decreased as the annealing temperature was increased (Figure ). To quantify the GB surface densities of the annealed samples, high-resolution TEM images of 200 NPs from each sample were analyzed as described above (Figures S5–S8). The GB surface density decreased monotonically with temperature from 40.6 ± 4.3 μm–1 for Cu/CNT_as-dep to 3.1 ± 0.2 μm–1 for Cu/CNT_500 (Table ). Annealing also caused a small amount of particle growth, with a maximum size of 33.6 ± 8.4 nm obtained for Cu/CNT_500 (Table ). A previous analysis of size effects showed that reducing the diameter of Cu NPs below 5 nm changes the surface faceting and distribution of coordination numbers at the surface, but there are no effects for sizes >5 nm. Moreover, size was reported to affect electrocatalytic activity only for NPs < 5 nm, which showed a ∼2-fold increase in activity but no change in selectivity.[27] The particles of all of the Cu/CNT samples studied here are much larger than this size regime.[27] To further characterize the effects of annealing Cu/CNT, TEM videos of individual NPs in the samples were obtained at 500 °C (Figure S9; videos S1 and S2). The videos show that GBs are lost via migration. Apart from GB loss, the overall structure of the NPs remains relatively unaffected. To complement the microstructural analysis by TEM, powder X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained for all Cu/CNT samples in grazing incidence mode using synchrotron radiation at 11.5 keV. All of the patterns showed 11 peaks at the expected diffraction angles for metallic Cu and a very small Cu oxide peak attributed to native oxide formation during the sample preparations (Figure a). Line shape analysis of the diffraction patterns was performed using the Williamson–Hall method to determine the average crystallite size and microstrain (Figure S10). The average crystallite sizes increased with annealing temperature from 10.6 nm for Cu/CNT_as-dep to 19.8 nm for Cu/CNT_500 (Table ). These sizes are smaller than the particle sizes measured by TEM because the particles are composed of multiple crystallites. The amount of microstrain was relatively high at 0.17% for Cu/CNT_as-dep and decreased with annealing temperature down to a small residual value of 0.02% for Cu/CNT_500 (Table ). The microstrain was correlated with the GB surface density (Figure b). This correlation may reflect the strain imposed by GBs on the adjacent lattice regions[28] or the presence of dislocations associated with the GBs.[29] As such, the microstrain values extracted from X-ray diffraction line shape analysis provide an indirect measurement of relative GB density in the Cu/CNT samples that corroborates the quantification by TEM.
Figure 2

Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction of Cu/CNT electrodes. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns for the as-deposited and annealed Cu/CNT electrodes. The very small peaks at 2θ = 41.7° are attributed to native oxide formed during sample preparations. (b) Correlation between the microstrain extracted from Williamson–Hall analysis and the GB surface density.

Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction of Cu/CNT electrodes. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns for the as-deposited and annealed Cu/CNT electrodes. The very small peaks at 2θ = 41.7° are attributed to native oxide formed during sample preparations. (b) Correlation between the microstrain extracted from Williamson–Hall analysis and the GB surface density. Cu/CNT films were rolled into yarns and connected to Cu wires for electrochemical measurements. The electrochemical Cu surface areas were estimated by measuring the double layer capacitance in 0.1 M HClO4 (Figure S11).[30] Compared to Cu/CNT_as-dep, annealing the Cu/CNT films up to 300 °C had minimal effect on the surface area and annealing at 400 and 500 °C reduced the surface area by only 14 and 32%, respectively (Table ). Because the Cu surface areas and particle sizes are comparable, the Cu/CNT samples enable GB effects to be studied independently of major morphological changes. The CO reduction activity of Cu/CNT electrodes was assessed using constant-potential electrolysis lasting several hours in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH electrolyte (Figure S12). The use of alkaline electrolyte is favorable because water is the only available H+ donor for HER, and, at a fixed potential vs RHE, the driving force for electron transfer is increased as the pH is increased. The gas-phase products were quantified by periodic gas chromatography of the headspace, and the solution phase products were quantified at the end of each experiment by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of the electrolyte (Figure S13). Figure a–c shows the Faradaic efficiencies for the CO reduction products on the five Cu/CNT electrodes at three different potentials. The remaining Faradaic efficiency up to 100% corresponds to H2 evolution. At all potentials, the selectivity for CO vs H2O reduction was the highest for Cu/CNT_as-dep and decreased monotonically as the annealing pretreatment temperature was increased. Cu/CNT_as-dep reached a peak value of 72% combined Faradaic efficiency for ethanol and acetate (28% H2) at −0.3 V, the highest value reported to date for CO reduction. Ethylene, ethane, and propanol were additional CO reduction products at more negative potentials. In contrast, Cu/CNT_500 had less than 7% Faradaic efficiency for CO reduction (93% H2) at all potentials, which was similar to commercial Cu NPs evaluated previously.[20] The background current for a CNT film without Cu NPs was <5% of the value for the Cu/CNT electrodes, and the only product observed was H2.
Figure 3

Correlation between the GB surface density and CO reduction activity. (a–c) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction products on the five Cu/CNT electrodes. The remaining Faradaic efficiency corresponds to H2 evolution. (d–f) Specific activity for CO reduction vs the GB surface density. (g–i) Specific activity for H2 evolution vs the GB surface density. The potentials are −0.3 V (a, d, g), – 0.4 V (b, e, h), and −0.5 V (c, f, i) vs RHE.

Correlation between the GB surface density and CO reduction activity. (a–c) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction products on the five Cu/CNT electrodes. The remaining Faradaic efficiency corresponds to H2 evolution. (d–f) Specific activity for CO reduction vs the GB surface density. (g–i) Specific activity for H2 evolution vs the GB surface density. The potentials are −0.3 V (a, d, g), – 0.4 V (b, e, h), and −0.5 V (c, f, i) vs RHE. The different Faradaic efficiencies for the Cu/CNT electrodes resulted from different CO reduction activities, which were strongly dependent on the GB surface densities. Figure d–f shows the surface area–normalized CO reduction current densities (specific jCOredn) vs the GB surface densities for the Cu/CNT electrodes at −0.3 V, −0.4 V, and −0.5 V. At −0.3 V, jCOredn was linearly proportional to the GB surface density across all samples (R2 = 0.990). At –0.4 V and −0.5 V, the relationship was linear for four of the samples and deviated from linearity for Cu/CNT_as-dep, the most GB-rich sample. This deviation is because the reduction kinetics depend, in part, on CO mass transport at the highest jCOredn values. All of the plots have intercepts very close to 0, suggesting that essentially all of the CO reduction activity from −0.3 V to −0.5 V arises from surface sites created by GBs. In contrast to CO reduction, GB surface density had very little effect on H2O reduction in either CO-saturated electrolyte (Figure g–i) or N2-saturated electrolyte (Figure S14). These results indicate that H2O reduction occurs primarily on low-index Cu facets. Although the GB surface density changes by more than an order of magnitude across the series, GB surface terminations are a minor fraction of the surface in all cases. The majority of the surfaces are likely comprised of low-index facets. The CO reduction activity of the GB-rich Cu/CNT_as-dep electrode compares favorably with oxide-derived Cu, which was previously the most active known catalyst for this reaction. jCOredn was 3–6-fold higher on Cu/CNT_as-dep than oxide-derived Cu electrodes when evaluated under the same conditions at −0.3 V to −0.5 V (Figure a).[20] The FE was also higher for Cu/CNT_as-dep (Figure b), although this difference was much smaller than the difference in jCOredn because oxide-derived Cu electrodes suppress H2O reduction but Cu/CNT_as-dep does not. The mass loading for Cu/CNT electrodes is extremely low compared to oxide-derived Cu, enabling much more efficient utilization of Cu. The steady-state mass activity (CO reduction current per Cu mass) of Cu/CNT_as-dep was 1–7 A g–1 from −0.3 to −0.55 V (Figure c). These values set benchmarks for future development of NP CO reduction catalysts. The geometric current density for CO reduction (geometric jCOredn) with Cu/CNT depends on the catalyst loading and the electrode geometry (Figure S15). With 0.6 mg Cu/CNT stretched over 2 cm2 (∼120 cm2 of Cu surface area), the geometric jCOredn was 0.37 mA/cm2 at −0.3 V, a value approaching the mass transport limit in the cell. Higher mass activities and jCOredn may be possible with better delivery of CO to the NP surfaces.
Figure 4

Performance of Cu/CNT_as-dep, the electrode with the highest GB surface density. (a, b) Comparison of the specific activity for CO reduction and Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction products between Cu/CNT_as-dep and oxide-derived Cu. (c) Mass activity for CO reduction at selected potentials for Cu/CNT_as-dep. (d) Total mass activity over time (black, left-axis) and Faradaic efficiency for H2 evolution over time (red, right-axis) for Cu/CNT_as-dep at −0.30 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte and at −0.25 V in 1 M KOH electrolyte, as indicated.

Performance of Cu/CNT_as-dep, the electrode with the highest GB surface density. (a, b) Comparison of the specific activity for CO reduction and Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction products between Cu/CNT_as-dep and oxide-derived Cu. (c) Mass activity for CO reduction at selected potentials for Cu/CNT_as-dep. (d) Total mass activity over time (black, left-axis) and Faradaic efficiency for H2 evolution over time (red, right-axis) for Cu/CNT_as-dep at −0.30 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte and at −0.25 V in 1 M KOH electrolyte, as indicated. The FE for CO reduction on Cu/CNT_as-dep is unchanged, and the mass activity exhibits only a slight decline over electrolysis lasting several hours (Figure d), indicating that the GBs are relatively stable under electrocatalytic conditions (Figure S16). Notably, the selectivity for ethanol vs acetate depends on the pH. As seen previously for oxide-derived Cu, acetate is the exclusive CO reduction product for Cu/CNT_as-dep at low overpotential when the electrolyte is switched from 0.1 to 1 M KOH (Figures d and S17). The strong correlation between GB surface density and CO electroreduction activity suggests that GBs alter the surface properties of the particle to lower the barrier for this reaction. We recently found using temperature-programmed desorption that the surfaces of oxide-derived Cu contain binding sites for CO that are stronger (by ∼7 kJ mol–1) than the sites on terraces or stepped surfaces.[23] We postulate that the GBs in Cu/CNT also create surfaces with strong CO binding sites and that these surfaces are responsible for the catalytic activity. Recent theoretical studies of CO reduction on Cu have proposed a rate-limiting reductive CO dimerization step,[18,31] which would be accelerated by increasing the CO binding strength. Further elucidation of the mechanism by which GBs affect catalysis will require atomic level structural elucidation of GB surface terminations.[32] Ideally, the surface structures will be probed under operating conditions to account for restructuring induced by the application of a voltage.[33] Researchers have previously proposed that stacking faults—a different kind of bulk defect—support active sites for CO hydrogenation to methanol on Cu NPs based on a correlation between activity and stacking fault probability determined by diffraction pattern analysis.[34−36]

Conclusion

Using bulk electrolysis and TEM measurements, we have shown that the steady-state, specific CO reduction activity on Cu NPs at moderate overpotential is correlated to the density of GBs. The quantitative correlation and near-zero activity in the limit of no GBs suggests that GBs are responsible for creating the vast majority of the active surfaces in this potential regime. Previously, GB engineering has been utilized with great success to change the mechanical properties of bulk metals.[37−40] Because nearly all of the GBs in a bulk material are buried, very little attention has been given to their effects on surface properties. The results here show the potential of using GBs to create persistent, catalytically active surfaces on NPs in the context of an especially demanding reaction. Exploiting GB effects for fuel synthesis and other chemistry will be aided by surface structure elucidation and new synthetic methods for preparing highly polycrystalline NPs.
  28 in total

1.  Superplastic extensibility of nanocrystalline copper at room temperature

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Near-perfect elastoplasticity in pure nanocrystalline copper.

Authors:  Yannick Champion; Cyril Langlois; Sandrine Guérin-Mailly; Patrick Langlois; Jean-Louis Bonnentien; Martin J Hytch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Theoretical Insights into a CO Dimerization Mechanism in CO2 Electroreduction.

Authors:  Joseph H Montoya; Chuan Shi; Karen Chan; Jens K Nørskov
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  Grain-boundary-dependent CO2 electroreduction activity.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Feng; Kaili Jiang; Shoushan Fan; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Catalysis for the valorization of exhaust carbon: from CO2 to chemicals, materials, and fuels. technological use of CO2.

Authors:  Michele Aresta; Angela Dibenedetto; Antonella Angelini
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 6.  Chemical technologies for exploiting and recycling carbon dioxide into the value chain.

Authors:  Martina Peters; Burkhard Köhler; Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs; Walter Leitner; Peter Markewitz; Thomas E Müller
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 8.928

7.  A selective and efficient electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction.

Authors:  Qi Lu; Jonathan Rosen; Yang Zhou; Gregory S Hutchings; Yannick C Kimmel; Jingguang G Chen; Feng Jiao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Nitrogen-based catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO.

Authors:  Claire E Tornow; Michael R Thorson; Sichao Ma; Andrew A Gewirth; Paul J A Kenis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  CO2 reduction at low overpotential on Cu electrodes resulting from the reduction of thick Cu2O films.

Authors:  Christina W Li; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Probing the Active Surface Sites for CO Reduction on Oxide-Derived Copper Electrocatalysts.

Authors:  Arnau Verdaguer-Casadevall; Christina W Li; Tobias P Johansson; Soren B Scott; Joseph T McKeown; Mukul Kumar; Ifan E L Stephens; Matthew W Kanan; Ib Chorkendorff
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Copper-Promoted Functionalization of Organic Molecules: from Biologically Relevant Cu/O2 Model Systems to Organometallic Transformations.

Authors:  Rachel Trammell; Khashayar Rajabimoghadam; Isaac Garcia-Bosch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Preparation of trimetallic electrocatalysts by one-step co-electrodeposition and efficient CO2 reduction to ethylene.

Authors:  Shuaiqiang Jia; Qinggong Zhu; Haihong Wu; Shitao Han; Mengen Chu; Jianxin Zhai; Xueqing Xing; Wei Xia; Mingyuan He; Buxing Han
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 9.969

3.  Microfabricated electrodes unravel the role of interfaces in multicomponent copper-based CO2 reduction catalysts.

Authors:  Gastón O Larrazábal; Tatsuya Shinagawa; Antonio J Martín; Javier Pérez-Ramírez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Operando time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals the chemical nature enabling highly selective CO2 reduction.

Authors:  Sheng-Chih Lin; Chun-Chih Chang; Shih-Yun Chiu; Hsiao-Tien Pai; Tzu-Yu Liao; Chia-Shuo Hsu; Wei-Hung Chiang; Ming-Kang Tsai; Hao Ming Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Origin of the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate by Chalcogen Modified Copper.

Authors:  Rodrigo García-Muelas; Federico Dattila; Tatsuya Shinagawa; Antonio J Martín; Javier Pérez-Ramírez; Núria López
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 6.475

Review 6.  Theoretical insights into selective electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Chan Woo Lee; Chanyeon Kim; Byoung Koun Min
Journal:  Nano Converg       Date:  2019-03-12

7.  Zn- and Ti-Doped SnO2 for Enhanced Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bejtka; Nicolò B D Monti; Adriano Sacco; Micaela Castellino; Samuele Porro; M Amin Farkhondehfal; Juqin Zeng; Candido F Pirri; Angelica Chiodoni
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  A reconstructed porous copper surface promotes selectivity and efficiency toward C2 products by electrocatalytic CO2 reduction.

Authors:  Jianyu Han; Chang Long; Jing Zhang; Ke Hou; Yi Yuan; Dawei Wang; Xiaofei Zhang; Xueying Qiu; Yanfei Zhu; Yin Zhang; Zhongjie Yang; Shuhao Yan; Zhiyong Tang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  Tracking a Common Surface-Bound Intermediate during CO2-to-Fuels Catalysis.

Authors:  Anna Wuttig; Can Liu; Qiling Peng; Momo Yaguchi; Christopher H Hendon; Kenta Motobayashi; Shen Ye; Masatoshi Osawa; Yogesh Surendranath
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 14.553

10.  Supramolecular Porphyrin Cages Assembled at Molecular-Materials Interfaces for Electrocatalytic CO Reduction.

Authors:  Ming Gong; Zhi Cao; Wei Liu; Eva M Nichols; Peter T Smith; Jeffrey S Derrick; Yi-Sheng Liu; Jinjia Liu; Xiaodong Wen; Christopher J Chang
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 14.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.