Literature DB >> 27162245

Intersectoral action on SDH and equity in Australian health policy.

Matthew Fisher1, Frances E Baum1, Colin MacDougall1,2, Lareen Newman1, Dennis McDermott3, Clare Phillips1.   

Abstract

Intersectoral action between public agencies across policy sectors, and between levels of government, is seen as essential for effective action by governments to address social determinants of health (SDH) and to reduce health inequities. The health sector has been identified as having a crucial stewardship role, to engage other policy sectors in action to address the impacts of their policies on health. This article reports on research to investigate intersectoral action on SDH and health inequities in Australian health policy. We gathered and individually analysed 266 policy documents, being all of the published, strategic health policies of the national Australian government and eight State/Territory governments, current at the time of sampling in late 2012-early 2013. Our analysis showed that strategies for intersectoral action were common in Australian health policy, but predominantly concerned with extending access to individualized medical or behavioural interventions to client groups in other policy sectors. Where intersectoral strategies did propose action on SDH (other than access to health-care), they were mostly limited to addressing proximal factors, rather than policy settings affecting the distribution of socioeconomic resources. There was little evidence of engagement between the health sector and those policy sectors most able to influence systemic socioeconomic inequalities in Australia.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  health policy; inequalities in health; intersectoral partnerships; social determinants of health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27162245     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  6 in total

1.  Challenging Institutional Norms to Improve Local-Level Policy for Health and Health Equity Comment on "Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups".

Authors:  Matthew Fisher
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 2.  Something Borrowed, Something New: A Governance and Social Construction Framework to Investigate Power Relations and Responses of Diverse Stakeholders to Policies Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Helena Legido-Quigley; Mishal S Khan; Anna Durrance-Bagale; Johanna Hanefeld
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-24

3.  Public Health from the Middle-Out: A New Analytical Perspective.

Authors:  Yannai Kranzler; Yael Parag; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Beyond COVID-19: Consumers call for greater focus on health equity.

Authors:  James A Smith; Leanne Wells; Lisa Gelbart; Tony Lawson
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2021-01-15

5.  Policy Adoption and the Implementation Woes of the Intersectoral First 1000 Days of Childhood Initiative, In the Western Cape Province of South Africa.

Authors:  Ida Okeyo; Uta Lehmann; Helen Schneider
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity.

Authors:  Fran Baum; Toni Delany-Crowe; Matthew Fisher; Colin MacDougall; Patrick Harris; Dennis McDermott; Dora Marinova
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.