Literature DB >> 27161119

The clinimetric properties of the COMFORT scale: A systematic review.

J Maaskant1,2, P Raymakers-Janssen3, E Veldhoen3, E Ista4, C Lucas5, H Vermeulen6,7.   

Abstract

The COMFORT scale is a measurement tool to assess distress, sedation and pain in nonverbal paediatric patients. Several studies have described the COMFORT scale, but no formal assessment of the methodological quality has been undertaken. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to study the clinimetric properties of the (modified) COMFORT scale in children up to 18 years. We searched Central, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo and Web of Science until December 2014. The selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Quality of the included studies was appraised using the COSMIN checklist. We found 30 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Most participants were ventilated children up to 4 years without neurological disorders. The results on internal consistency and interrater reliability showed values of >0.70 in most studies, indicating an adequate reliability. Construct validity resulted in correlations between 0.68 and 0.84 for distress, between 0.42 and 0.94 for sedation and between 0.31 and 0.96 for pain. The responsiveness of the (modified) COMFORT scale seems to be adequate. The quality of the included studies ranged from poor to excellent. The COMFORT scale shows overall an adequate reliability in providing information on distress, sedation and pain. Construct validity varies from good to excellent for distress, from moderate to excellent for sedation, and from poor to excellent for pain. The included studies were clinically and methodologically heterogeneous, hampering firm conclusions. WHAT DOES THIS REVIEW ADD?: An in-depth assessment of the clinimetric properties of the COMFORT scale. The COMFORT scale shows overall an adequate reliability in providing information on distress, sedation and pain. Construct validity varies from good to excellent for distress, from moderate to excellent for sedation, and from poor to excellent for pain.
© 2016 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27161119     DOI: 10.1002/ejp.880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  9 in total

1.  Behavioral Observation of Infants With Life-Threatening or Life-Limiting Illness in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Christine A Fortney; Stephanie D Sealschott; Rita H Pickler
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 2.  Pain Scales in Neonates Receiving Mechanical Ventilation in Neonatal Intensive Care Units - Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hanna Popowicz; Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś; Jolanta Olszewska; Wioletta A Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 3.  Clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (-Revised): A systematic review.

Authors:  P Vink; C Lucas; J M Maaskant; W S van Erp; R Lindeboom; H Vermeulen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Measurement properties of instruments to assess pain in children and adolescents with cancer: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Erik A H Loeffen; Jennifer N Stinson; Kathryn A Birnie; Monique van Dijk; Ketan Kulkarni; Mienke Rijsdijk; Anna Font-Gonzalez; L Lee Dupuis; Elvira C van Dalen; Renée L Mulder; Fiona Campbell; Wim J E Tissing; Marianne D van de Wetering; Faith Gibson
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-28

5.  Interventional cohort study of prolonged use (>72 hours) of paracetamol in neonates: protocol of the PARASHUTE study.

Authors:  Sissel Sundell Haslund-Krog; Steen Hertel; Kim Dalhoff; Susanne Poulsen; Ulla Christensen; Diana Wilkins; John van den Anker; Tine Brink Henriksen; Helle Holst
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2019-03-30

6.  Comparing ivWatch biosensor to standard care to identify extravasation injuries in the paediatric intensive care: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Craig Antony McBride; Sarfaraz Rahiman; Luregn J Schlapbach; Jessica A Schults; Tricia M Kleidon; Melanie Kennedy; Rebecca S Paterson; Joshua Byrnes; Robert S Ware; Amanda Judith Ullman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia.

Authors:  Alice Fagin; Tina L Palmieri
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-10-16

8.  MONISEDA Project: Improving Analgosedation Monitoring in Spanish Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Santiago Mencía; Raquel Cieza; Jimena Del Castillo; Jesús López-Herce
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Validity and Reliability of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Rocío Tapia; Jesús López-Herce; Ángel Arias; Jimena Del Castillo; Santiago Mencía
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.