Literature DB >> 27160644

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Disease Risk and Post Allograft Minimal Residual Disease on Survival.

Binod Dhakal1, Anita D'Souza1, Michael Martens2, Jonathan Kapke3, Alexandra M Harrington4, Marcelo Pasquini1, Wael Saber1, William R Drobyski1, Mei Jie Zhang2, Mehdi Hamadani1, Parameswaran N Hari5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative option for multiple myeloma (MM). We analyzed our experience of allo-HCT in MM and examined outcomes in 77 consecutive patients with MM receiving allo-HCT from matched sibling (n = 69) or unrelated donors (n = 8). The primary objectives were to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and non-relapse mortality in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients received non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, while 11 received myeloablative regimens. The median follow-up of survivors was 50 months (range, 2.3-129.3 months).
RESULTS: Twenty-seven (35.1%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis (t (4:14), 17p deletion, chromosome 1 abnormality, or t (14:16)). All of patients except 1 had prior auto transplant. On multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001 = 1.11; P = .04), less than complete remission (CR) at allo-HCT (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3-14.1; P = .006), and cytomegalovirus reactivation (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.38-7.6; P = .002) were associated with higher mortality risk. Less than CR at allo-HCT was also associated with higher risk for non-relapse mortality (HR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-26.3; P = .02). There was no difference in OS or PFS between high-risk and standard-risk cytogenetics. No difference in OS and PFS was seen in those who had morphological complete response regardless of the minimal residual disease status.
CONCLUSION: Allotransplant benefited younger patients and those in CR at the time of transplant. The adverse effect of high-risk cytogenetics may be overcome by the allo-HCT.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation; Minimal residual disease; Multiple myeloma; Risk status

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27160644     DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  8 in total

1.  Long-Term Follow-up of CALGB (Alliance) 100001: Autologous Followed by Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplant for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Sarah A Holstein; Vera J Suman; Kouros Owzar; Katelyn Santo; Don M Benson; Thomas C Shea; Thomas Martin; Margarida Silverman; Luis Isola; Ravi Vij; Bruce D Cheson; Charles Linker; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson; Philip L McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Outcomes in newly diagnosed young or high-risk myeloma patients receiving tandem autologous/allogeneic transplant followed by bortezomib maintenance: a phase II study.

Authors:  Richard LeBlanc; Imran Ahmad; Rafik Terra; Jean-Samuel Boudreault; David Ogez; Kristopher Lamore; Jean-Sébastien Delisle; Nadia Bambace; Léa Bernard; Sandra Cohen; Thomas Kiss; Silvy Lachance; Séverine Landais; Émilie Lemieux-Blanchard; Guy Sauvageau; Michael Sebag; Denis Claude Roy; Jean Roy
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Long-term survival and polyclonal immunoglobulin reconstitution after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Christine Eisfeld; Eva Eßeling; Ramona Wullenkord; Cyrus Khandanpour; Julia Reusch; Jan-Henrik Mikesch; Christian Reicherts; Andrea Kerkhoff; Christoph Schliemann; Torsten Kessler; Rolf M Mesters; Wolfgang E Berdel; Georg Lenz; Matthias Stelljes
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.673

4.  Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? (Running Title: The Role of Salvage alloSCT in MM).

Authors:  Hyunkyung Park; Ja Min Byun; Sung-Soo Yoon; Youngil Koh; Dong-Yeop Shin; Junshik Hong; Inho Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Christine Greil; Monika Engelhardt; Jürgen Finke; Ralph Wäsch
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Assessment of Molecular Residual Disease Using Circulating Tumor DNA to Identify Multiple Myeloma Patients at High Risk of Relapse.

Authors:  Binod Dhakal; Shruti Sharma; Mustafa Balcioglu; Svetlana Shchegrova; Meenakshi Malhotra; Bernhard Zimmermann; Paul R Billings; Alexandra Harrington; Himanshu Sethi; Alexey Aleshin; Parameswaran N Hari
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  A Case Report of a 58-Year-Old Woman with a Diagnosis of High-Risk Myeloma Refractory to Multiple Line of Therapy and Treated with Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Michael Cass; Andrew B McDonald; Osnat Ben-Shahar; Yosef Landesman; Trinayan Kashyap
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-21

8.  Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis from 2007 to 2017.

Authors:  Xuejiao Yin; Liang Tang; Fengjuan Fan; Qinyue Jiang; Chunyan Sun; Yu Hu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.722

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.