| Literature DB >> 27160299 |
Katarzyna Byk1, Krzysztof Jasinski1, Zaneta Bartel1, Agnieszka Jasztal2, Barbara Sitek2, Boguslaw Tomanek1,3, Stefan Chlopicki2,4, Tomasz Skorka5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess alterations in perfusion and liver function in the concanavalin A (ConA)-induced mouse model of acute liver failure (ALF) using two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based methods: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with Gd-EOB-DTPA contrast agent and arterial spin labelling (ASL).Entities:
Keywords: Acute liver failure; Arterial spin labelling; DCE-MRI; Empirical mathematical modelling; Perfusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27160299 PMCID: PMC5124046 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0563-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MAGMA ISSN: 0968-5243 Impact factor: 2.310
Fig. 1The FAIR pulse sequence with EPI readout. Two MR images are necessary for perfusion imaging, one with selective (a, b) and one with non-selective inversion of spins (c, d). a The RF pulse is applied simultaneously with the slice selective gradient (shaded grey) for the selective inversion of spins. The slice gradient is followed by the spoiler gradient for magnetisation refocussing. b The selective inversion is wider than the selected slice (in white) to ensure uniform inversion. c As a control image, the RF pulse is applied without the slice-selective gradient providing excitation of all spins. d The area of non-selective inversion covers the entire sensitive region of the RF coil. The FAIR pulse sequence is followed by the EPI sequence to create the MR image [14]
Fig. 2Representative microphotographs of cross sections of the livers harvested from a the control group (H&E staining; ×200); b ConA group (TRICHROME staining; ×200); c ConA group (H&E staining; ×400). A small inflammation focus is visible (arrow) in a. Haemorrhage (marked with a black star), haemorrhagic necrosis (marked with a red star) and embolism in a vessel (arrow) are visible in b. Hepatocyte blebs (arrows) are visible in c
Histopathological evaluation of control mice and mice with liver injury induced by ConA
| Parameter | Control group | ConA group |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Rank sum | Median | Rank sum | ||
| Haemorrhagic necrosis [%] | 0 | 42 | 0 | 63 | 0.2 |
| Coagulative necrosis [%] |
|
|
|
|
|
| Vessel wall infiltration [a.u.] |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tissue changes [%] |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyperaemia, coagulative necrosis and vessel wall infiltration were observed in the samples from the ConA group. A median and rank sum from the Mann-Whitney U test are shown. Test results were assumed to be significantly different at p < 0.05 (italics)
Fig. 3Examples of the perfusion [ml/min/100 g] (a, b) and T 1 [ms] (c, e) maps. Both maps were rescaled from the original size to 256 × 171 pixels. Thresholding of pixel values greater than 500 ml/min/100 g was applied to the perfusion maps. Perfusion (c) and T 1 values (f) were assessed for seven control and seven treated animals. a Perfusion map of the control liver. b Perfusion map of the ALF liver. c Perfusion values within ROIs in the livers of the control and ConA group. The difference in perfusion between the control and ConA group is statistically significant (**p = 0.008). d T 1 map of control liver. e T 1 map of ALF liver. f T 1 values in the control and ConA group are significantly different (***p < 0.001). Areas of liver in MR images (a–d) are contoured in white
Fig. 4Examples of the time courses of signal changes in the control and ConA group with the fitted empirical mathematical model. The differences in the curvatures of the enhancement peaks and wash-out regions of the curves for the ConA and the control are visible. The corresponding DCE-MR images of the liver from the control group are shown beneath the horizontal axis: (1) pre-contrast; (2) 6 min after contrast injection (maximum enhancement of liver parenchyma is visible, T peak in control group was equal to 6.14 min); (3) 30 min; (4) 60 min; (5) 90 min after contrast injection (contrast is washed out from the liver tissue). During the initial 30 min, MR images were acquired in three series, 150 images each. After 30 min, one image was acquired every 10 min
Parameters obtained by fitting the EMM equation to the experimental data for both groups
| Parameter | Control group | ConA group |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 57,100 ± 9669 | 67,355 ± 31747 | 0.43 |
|
| 0.20 ± 0.11 | 0.11 ± 0.08 | 0.1 |
|
| 0.432 ± 0.064 | 0.380 ± 0.064 | 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 ± 0.002 (r.s.43) | 0.004 ± 0.007 (r.s.62) | 0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ES [1/min] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AUC |
|
|
|
The parameters, except γ, were tested with the t test. γ was tested with the Mann-Whitney U test; rank sum is placed in parentheses. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05 (italics)
Spearman rank order correlations between EMM parameters and histological and biochemical parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ES | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haemorrhagic necrosis [%] |
| 0.279 |
| −0.224 | 0.282 | −0.398 | 0.429 |
| 0.322 |
| Coagulative necrosis [%] |
| 0.059 | −0.522 |
| 0.215 | −0.445 |
|
|
|
| Vessel wall infiltration [a.u.] |
| 0.111 | −0.410 |
| 0.401 | −0.429 |
| −0.510 |
|
| Tissue changes [%] |
| 0.000 | −0.482 |
| 0.229 | −0.509 |
|
|
|
| ALT [U/l] |
| −0.159 | −0.441 |
| 0.216 |
|
|
|
|
| AST [U/l] |
| −0.095 | −0.332 |
| 0.090 |
|
|
|
|
Correlations were calculated for seven animals in the control group and seven in the ALF group. Correlations marked in italics are assumed significant at p < 0.05