Literature DB >> 27159806

Electroosmotic Trap Against the Electrophoretic Force Near a Protein Nanopore Reveals Peptide Dynamics During Capture and Translocation.

Alina Asandei1, Irina Schiopu1, Mauro Chinappi2, Chang Ho Seo3, Yoonkyung Park4, Tudor Luchian5.   

Abstract

We report on the ability to control the dynamics of a single peptide capture and passage across a voltage-biased, α-hemolysin nanopore (α-HL), under conditions that the electroosmotic force exerted on the analyte dominates the electrophoretic transport. We demonstrate that by extending outside the nanopore, the electroosmotic force is able to capture a peptide at either the lumen or vestibule entry of the nanopore, and transiently traps it inside the nanopore, against the electrophoretic force. Statistical analysis of the resolvable dwell-times of a metastable trapped peptide, as it occupies either the β-barrel or vestibule domain of the α-HL nanopore, reveals rich kinetic details regarding the direction and rates of stochastic movement of a peptide inside the nanopore. The presented approach demonstrates the ability to shuttle and study molecules along the passage pathway inside the nanopore, allows to identify the mesoscopic trajectory of a peptide exiting the nanopore through either the vestibule or β-barrel moiety, thus providing convincing proof of a molecule translocating the pore. The kinetic analysis of a peptide fluctuating between various microstates inside the nanopore, enabled a detailed picture of the free energy description of its interaction with the α-HL nanopore. When studied at the limit of vanishingly low transmembrane potentials, this provided a thermodynamic description of peptide reversible binding to and within the α-HL nanopore, under equilibrium conditions devoid of electric and electroosmotic contributions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electroosmosis; nanopore; peptide transport; single-molecule; α-hemolysin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27159806     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b03697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  27 in total

1.  Interactions of a Polypeptide with a Protein Nanopore Under Crowding Conditions.

Authors:  Motahareh Ghahari Larimi; Lauren Ashley Mayse; Liviu Movileanu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  If Squeezed, a Camel Passes Through the Eye of a Needle: Voltage-Mediated Stretching of Dendrimers Facilitates Passage Through a Nanopore.

Authors:  Alina Asandei; Irina Schiopu; Corina Ciobanasu; Yoonkyung Park; Tudor Luchian
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 3.  Single-molecule protein sensing in a nanopore: a tutorial.

Authors:  Nitinun Varongchayakul; Jiaxi Song; Amit Meller; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Computational methods and theory for ion channel research.

Authors:  C Guardiani; F Cecconi; L Chiodo; G Cottone; P Malgaretti; L Maragliano; M L Barabash; G Camisasca; M Ceccarelli; B Corry; R Roth; A Giacomello; B Roux
Journal:  Adv Phys X       Date:  2022

5.  Geometrically Induced Selectivity and Unidirectional Electroosmosis in Uncharged Nanopores.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Muccio; Blasco Morozzo Della Rocca; Mauro Chinappi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 18.027

6.  Electroosmosis Dominates Electrophoresis of Antibiotic Transport Across the Outer Membrane Porin F.

Authors:  Jayesh A Bafna; Sushil Pangeni; Mathias Winterhalter; M Alphan Aksoyoglu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Modulation of electrophoresis, electroosmosis and diffusion for electrical transport of proteins through a solid-state nanopore.

Authors:  Jugal Saharia; Y M Nuwan D Y Bandara; Buddini I Karawdeniya; Cassandra Hammond; George Alexandrakis; Min Jun Kim
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  β-Barrel Nanopores with an Acidic-Aromatic Sensing Region Identify Proteinogenic Peptides at Low pH.

Authors:  Roderick Corstiaan Abraham Versloot; Sabine Angenieta Paulina Straathof; Gemma Stouwie; Matthijs Jonathan Tadema; Giovanni Maglia
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 18.027

9.  Current noise of a protein-selective biological nanopore.

Authors:  Jiaxin Sun; Avinash Kumar Thakur; Liviu Movileanu
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  The Manipulation of the Internal Hydrophobicity of FraC Nanopores Augments Peptide Capture and Recognition.

Authors:  Florian Leonardus Rudolfus Lucas; Kumar Sarthak; Erica Mariska Lenting; David Coltan; Nieck Jordy van der Heide; Roderick Corstiaan Abraham Versloot; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Giovanni Maglia
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.