Melinda Pénzes1, Kristie L Foley2, Péter Balázs1, Róbert Urbán3. 1. a Institute of Public Health, Semmelweis University , Budapest , Hungary. 2. b Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy , Wake Forest University School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , North Carolina , USA. 3. c Department of Personality and Health Psychology , Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest , Hungary.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes are often used to promote cessation. Only a few studies have explored the motivations for e-cigarette experimentation among young adults. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to assess the intention to try e-cigarettes among Hungarian university students and to develop a motivational scale to measure vulnerability to e-cigarette experimentation. METHODS: 826 Hungarian university students completed an internet-based survey in 2013 to measure motives for trying e-cigarettes. We conducted exploratory factor analyses and identified factors that promote and deter experimentation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the concurrent predictive validity of the identified motivational factors and we used these factors to predict e-cigarette experimentation, controlling for other known correlates of e-cigarette use. RESULTS: 24.9% of the participants have ever tried an e-cigarette and 17.2% of current nonsmokers experimented with the product. Almost 11% of respondents intended to try an e-cigarette in the future, yet only 0.6% were current e-cigarette users. Six factors were identified in the motivational scale for experimentation, four that promote usage (health benefits/smoking cessation; curiosity/taste variety; perceived social norms; convenience when smoking is prohibited) and two that deter usage (chemical hazard; danger of dependence). In a logistic regression analysis, the curiosity/taste factor was the only motivational factor significantly associated with the intention to try e-cigarettes in the future. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to test a motivational scale about what motivates e-cigarettes usage among university students. Additional research is needed to better understand these factors and their influence on e-cigarette uptake.
BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes are often used to promote cessation. Only a few studies have explored the motivations for e-cigarette experimentation among young adults. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to assess the intention to try e-cigarettes among Hungarian university students and to develop a motivational scale to measure vulnerability to e-cigarette experimentation. METHODS: 826 Hungarian university students completed an internet-based survey in 2013 to measure motives for trying e-cigarettes. We conducted exploratory factor analyses and identified factors that promote and deter experimentation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the concurrent predictive validity of the identified motivational factors and we used these factors to predict e-cigarette experimentation, controlling for other known correlates of e-cigarette use. RESULTS: 24.9% of the participants have ever tried an e-cigarette and 17.2% of current nonsmokers experimented with the product. Almost 11% of respondents intended to try an e-cigarette in the future, yet only 0.6% were current e-cigarette users. Six factors were identified in the motivational scale for experimentation, four that promote usage (health benefits/smoking cessation; curiosity/taste variety; perceived social norms; convenience when smoking is prohibited) and two that deter usage (chemical hazard; danger of dependence). In a logistic regression analysis, the curiosity/taste factor was the only motivational factor significantly associated with the intention to try e-cigarettes in the future. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to test a motivational scale about what motivates e-cigarettes usage among university students. Additional research is needed to better understand these factors and their influence on e-cigarette uptake.
Entities:
Keywords:
E-cigarettes; electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS); motivation; student; scale development
Authors: Megan E Piper; Thomas M Piasecki; E Belle Federman; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Andrew Hyland; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Thomas P McCoy; Holly E R Morrell; Bettina B Hoeppner; Mark Wolfson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jessica K Pepper; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Linda D Cameron; Melissa B Gilkey; Noel T Brewer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Eunhee Park; Misol Kwon; Thomas Chacko; Yanjun Zhou; Chiahui Chen; Maciej L Goniewicz; Chin-Shang Li; Yu-Ping Chang Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Grzegorz Marek Brożek; Mateusz Jankowski; Joshua Allan Lawson; Andrei Shpakou; Michał Poznański; Tadeusz Maria Zielonka; Ludmila Klimatckaia; Yelena Loginovich; Marta Rachel; Justína Gereová; Justyna Golonko; Ihar Naumau; Kamil Kornicki; Paulina Pepłowska; Valeriy Kovalevskiy; Asta Raskiliene; Krzysztof Bielewicz; Zuzana Krištúfková; Robert Mróz; Paulina Majek; Jakub Lubanski; Dorota Kaleta; Jarosław Pinkas; Jan Eugeniusz Zejda Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ben Wamamili; Sheleigh Lawler; Mark Wallace-Bell; Coral Gartner; David Sellars; Randolph C Grace; Ryan Courtney; Pat Coope Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 2.692