Nathaniel A Bates1, Rebecca J Nesbitt2, Jason T Shearn2, Gregory D Myer3, Timothy E Hewett4. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 3. Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Department of Pediatrics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA The Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA hewett.timothy@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tibial slope angle is a nonmodifiable risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, the mechanical role of varying tibial slopes during athletic tasks has yet to be clinically quantified. PURPOSE: To examine the influence of posterior tibial slope on knee joint loading during controlled, in vitro simulation of the knee joint articulations during athletic tasks. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: A 6 degree of freedom robotic manipulator positionally maneuvered cadaveric knee joints from 12 unique specimens with varying tibial slopes (range, -7.7° to 7.7°) through drop vertical jump and sidestep cutting tasks that were derived from 3-dimensional in vivo motion recordings. Internal knee joint torques and forces were recorded throughout simulation and were linearly correlated with tibial slope. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) posterior tibial slope angle was 2.2° ± 4.3° in the lateral compartment and 2.3° ± 3.3° in the medial compartment. For simulated drop vertical jumps, lateral compartment tibial slope angle expressed moderate, direct correlations with peak internally generated knee adduction (r = 0.60-0.65), flexion (r = 0.64-0.66), lateral (r = 0.57-0.69), and external rotation torques (r = 0.47-0.72) as well as inverse correlations with peak abduction (r = -0.42 to -0.61) and internal rotation torques (r = -0.39 to -0.79). Only frontal plane torques were correlated during sidestep cutting simulations. For simulated drop vertical jumps, medial compartment tibial slope angle expressed moderate, direct correlations with peak internally generated knee flexion torque (r = 0.64-0.69) and lateral knee force (r = 0.55-0.74) as well as inverse correlations with peak external torque (r = -0.34 to -0.67) and medial knee force (r = -0.58 to -0.59). These moderate correlations were also present during simulated sidestep cutting. CONCLUSION: The investigation supported the theory that increased posterior tibial slope would lead to greater magnitude knee joint moments, specifically, internally generated knee adduction and flexion torques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The knee torques that positively correlated with increased tibial slope angle in this investigation are associated with heightened risk of ACL injury. Therefore, the present data indicated that a higher posterior tibial slope is correlated to increased knee loads that are associated with heightened risk of ACL injury.
BACKGROUND: Tibial slope angle is a nonmodifiable risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, the mechanical role of varying tibial slopes during athletic tasks has yet to be clinically quantified. PURPOSE: To examine the influence of posterior tibial slope on knee joint loading during controlled, in vitro simulation of the knee joint articulations during athletic tasks. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: A 6 degree of freedom robotic manipulator positionally maneuvered cadaveric knee joints from 12 unique specimens with varying tibial slopes (range, -7.7° to 7.7°) through drop vertical jump and sidestep cutting tasks that were derived from 3-dimensional in vivo motion recordings. Internal knee joint torques and forces were recorded throughout simulation and were linearly correlated with tibial slope. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) posterior tibial slope angle was 2.2° ± 4.3° in the lateral compartment and 2.3° ± 3.3° in the medial compartment. For simulated drop vertical jumps, lateral compartment tibial slope angle expressed moderate, direct correlations with peak internally generated knee adduction (r = 0.60-0.65), flexion (r = 0.64-0.66), lateral (r = 0.57-0.69), and external rotation torques (r = 0.47-0.72) as well as inverse correlations with peak abduction (r = -0.42 to -0.61) and internal rotation torques (r = -0.39 to -0.79). Only frontal plane torques were correlated during sidestep cutting simulations. For simulated drop vertical jumps, medial compartment tibial slope angle expressed moderate, direct correlations with peak internally generated knee flexion torque (r = 0.64-0.69) and lateral knee force (r = 0.55-0.74) as well as inverse correlations with peak external torque (r = -0.34 to -0.67) and medial knee force (r = -0.58 to -0.59). These moderate correlations were also present during simulated sidestep cutting. CONCLUSION: The investigation supported the theory that increased posterior tibial slope would lead to greater magnitude knee joint moments, specifically, internally generated knee adduction and flexion torques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The knee torques that positively correlated with increased tibial slope angle in this investigation are associated with heightened risk of ACL injury. Therefore, the present data indicated that a higher posterior tibial slope is correlated to increased knee loads that are associated with heightened risk of ACL injury.
Authors: Javad Hashemi; Naveen Chandrashekar; Brian Gill; Bruce D Beynnon; James R Slauterbeck; Robert C Schutt; Hossein Mansouri; Eugene Dabezies Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Jane Khoury; Paul Succop; Timothy E Hewett Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Rebecca J Nesbitt; Safa T Herfat; Daniel V Boguszewski; Andrew J Engel; Marc T Galloway; Jason T Shearn Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Nathaniel A Bates; Rebecca J Nesbitt; Jason T Shearn; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Andreas Weiler; Clemens Gwinner; Michael Wagner; Felix Ferner; Michael J Strobel; Jörg Dickschas Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Claire D Eliasberg; Kyle N Kunze; Erica Swartwout; Atul F Kamath; Hugo Robichaud; Anil S Ranawat Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-05-09
Authors: Jed A Diekfuss; Dustin R Grooms; Katharine S Nissen; Daniel K Schneider; Kim D Barber Foss; Staci Thomas; Scott Bonnette; Jonathan A Dudley; Weihong Yuan; Danielle L Reddington; Jonathan D Ellis; James Leach; Michael Gordon; Craig Lindsey; Ken Rushford; Carlee Shafer; Gregory D Myer Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Rebecca J Nesbitt; Nathaniel A Bates; Marepalli B Rao; Grant Schaffner; Jason T Shearn Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 3.934