Solar-to-hydrogen photoelectrochemical cells (PECs) have been proposed as a means of converting sunlight into H2 fuel. However, in traditional PECs, the oxygen evolution reaction and the hydrogen evolution reaction are coupled, and so the rate of both of these is limited by the photocurrents that can be generated from the solar flux. This in turn leads to slow rates of gas evolution that favor crossover of H2 into the O2 stream and vice versa, even through ostensibly impermeable membranes such as Nafion. Herein, we show that the use of the electron-coupled-proton buffer (ECPB) H3PMo12O40 allows solar-driven O2 evolution from water to proceed at rates of over 1 mA cm(-2) on WO3 photoanodes without the need for any additional electrochemical bias. No H2 is produced in the PEC, and instead H3PMo12O40 is reduced to H5PMo12O40. If the reduced ECPB is subjected to a separate electrochemical reoxidation, then H2 is produced with full overall Faradaic efficiency.
Solar-to-hydrogen photoelectrochemical cells (PECs) have been proposed as a means of converting sunlight into H2 fuel. However, in traditional PECs, the oxygen evolution reaction and the hydrogen evolution reaction are coupled, and so the rate of both of these is limited by the photocurrents that can be generated from the solar flux. This in turn leads to slow rates of gas evolution that favor crossover of H2 into the O2 stream and vice versa, even through ostensibly impermeable membranes such as Nafion. Herein, we show that the use of the electron-coupled-proton buffer (ECPB) H3PMo12O40 allows solar-driven O2 evolution from water to proceed at rates of over 1 mA cm(-2) on WO3 photoanodes without the need for any additional electrochemical bias. No H2 is produced in the PEC, and instead H3PMo12O40 is reduced to H5PMo12O40. If the reduced ECPB is subjected to a separate electrochemical reoxidation, then H2 is produced with full overall Faradaic efficiency.
The need to
develop carbon-neutral
energy sources is rapidly becoming an environmental and economic imperative.[1] Solar power is an especially attractive option
for this purpose, as it is both abundant and widely distributed geographically.[2] Solar irradiation at the earth’s surface
is inherently intermittent, due to both the weather and the diurnal
cycle. This means that if solar power is to be effective as a multi-terawatt
power source, then ways to store this energy to use at times when
the sun is not shining must be found.[3]The photoassisted electrolysis of water has been studied by numerous
groups as a method by which solar energy could be stored as a fuel
(H2).[4] However, there remain
several challenges to overcome before viable and cost-effective solar-to-hydrogen
photoelectrochemical cells can be realized. First, solar power is
diffuse, so that low current densities (∼10 mA cm–2 has been taken as a benchmark for a 10% efficient solar-to-fuels
device under 1 Sun illumination)[5] are standard,
and even then these current densities are highly variable. Low current
densities equate to slow gas production rates, and this can lead to
extensive mixing of product gases, both in devices without a headspace
separator[6a] and even in electrolyzers where
“gas-impermeable” membranes such as Nafion are employed.[6b−6d] At one extreme, this has the potential to produce explosive H2/O2 gas mixtures. In the less extreme case, where
product gas crossover is slower, hydrogen permeating to the anode
side of the cell is preferentially oxidized to protons and electrons,
while oxygen on the cathode side is preferentially reduced to water.
While these reactions prevent the buildup of dangerous headspace compositions,
they consume energy and have a detrimental effect on overall solar-to-collected-hydrogen
efficiencies.[6] Gas crossover can be mitigated
by using thicker membranes, but this in turn reduces efficiency by
introducing greater ohmic resistance in the cell.[6a,6c]A second challenge in the realization of a practical solar-to-hydrogen
cell is how the hydrogen itself is harvested. Assuming a current density
of 10 mA cm–2 for hydrogen production[5] and a target of producing 500 g of H2 gas over the course of 8 h irradiation at 1 Sun,[7] then an array of area ∼17 m2 is required
(see Section SI-5 in the Supporting Information (SI) for calculation). This is possible in principle (see arguments
advanced in ref (3b) and a functioning PEC system described in ref (4n)), but collecting H2 from such a high surface area array may be inefficient. Production
of hydrogen at a point source would make effective use of any H2 evolution catalyst and would also facilitate pressurization
for storage.We previously reported the concept of the electron-coupled-proton
buffer (ECPB), whereby the water oxidation and proton reduction half-reactions
of water splitting can be completely decoupled in both space and time, Figure .[8] Taking the example of phosphomolybdate ([PMo12O40]3–) as the ECPB, this decoupling
can be described by the half-reactions:
Figure 1
Use of ECPBs allows the
electrolysis of water to be split into
two steps both spatially and temporally. Step 1 (blue lines) is the
oxidation of water concomitant with reduction of the ECPB, and step
2 (red lines) is reoxidation of the ECPB with concomitant hydrogen
evolution. Previously, both steps have been driven electrochemically,[8a,8b] and an electrochemical step 1 followed by a catalytic release of
H2 in step 2 has been demonstrated.[8c] Herein, we show that step 1 can be performed in a PEC,
with an electrochemical step 2.
Use of ECPBs allows the
electrolysis of water to be split into
two steps both spatially and temporally. Step 1 (blue lines) is the
oxidation of water concomitant with reduction of the ECPB, and step
2 (red lines) is reoxidation of the ECPB with concomitant hydrogen
evolution. Previously, both steps have been driven electrochemically,[8a,8b] and an electrochemical step 1 followed by a catalytic release of
H2 in step 2 has been demonstrated.[8c] Herein, we show that step 1 can be performed in a PEC,
with an electrochemical step 2.In our original work,[8a] both of
the
necessary energy inputs for eqs /1b and 2 were provided purely electrochemically. However, we hypothesized
that such a system would be amenable to a combined photoelectrochemical
cycle, whereby eqs and 1b would be driven in a PEC without a
bias voltage and eq would be driven electrochemically (with a bias voltage). Herein,
we demonstrate the feasibility of such a system by using a WO3 photoanode in a PEC to drive the simultaneous oxidation of
water to O2 and reduction of [PMo12O40]3– to [PMo12O40]5– without the need for any additional electrical bias. Current densities
of over 1 mA cm–2 were achieved under simulated
solar irradiation with high Faradaic efficiency for oxygen production,
but without any detectable hydrogen production during irradiation
(and hence no danger of the product gases mixing). The reduced phosphomolybdate
could subsequently be reoxidized electrochemically to regenerate [PMo12O40]3– and produce hydrogen
with full Faradaic efficiency.A general schematic of the photoelectrochemical
cell for O2 evolution and reduction of the ECPB is given
in Figure . Tungsten
trioxide
was chosen as the photoanode because it is stable under the pH conditions
used in this work (pH 0.1) and because its band gap straddles both
water oxidation onset (ca. +1.2 V vs NHE) and the
reduction potential of [PMo12O40]3– (ca. +0.6 V vs NHE)[8a] at this pH.[9] An airtight cell was thus
constructed according to Figure , using a 1 cm2 WO3 photoanode
(prepared on an FTO substrate by a literature procedure)[10] in contact with 1 M methanesulfonic acid (pH
0.1) in one compartment and phosphomolybdic acid (H3PMo12O40, 0.5 M in water) in the other compartment
in contact with a large area carbon felt electrode. The two chambers
were separated by a Nafion membrane, and an electrical connection
was established between the photoanode and carbon felt cathode through
a potentiostat. The reference and counter electrode leads of this
potentiostat were both connected to the cathode to give a floating
reference (or two-electrode) configuration, across which fixed bias
voltages could be applied in a controlled fashion (see SI for a full description of the experimental
setup). It is important to note that although the ECPB is highly colored,
it is retained in the cathode compartment by the membrane such that
the photoanode is immersed in a transparent solution containing 1
M methanesulfonic acid only. Hence there is no attenuation of the
irradiation reaching the photoanode by the ECPB.
Figure 2
General schematic of
the photoelectrochemical cell configuration
used to drive water oxidation and concomitant reduction of the ECPB
at zero bias. FTO = fluorine-doped tin oxide on glass. The reduction
of the ECPB at the cathode is shown as being coupled to protonation
as suggested by our previous results (see ref (8a)).
General schematic of
the photoelectrochemical cell configuration
used to drive water oxidation and concomitant reduction of the ECPB
at zero bias. FTO = fluorine-dopedtin oxide on glass. The reduction
of the ECPB at the cathode is shown as being coupled to protonation
as suggested by our previous results (see ref (8a)).Figure (top)
shows
a chopped-light experiment in which the applied bias voltage between
the photoanode and cathode was fixed at 0 V (i.e., no external bias),
and the photoanode was irradiated periodically with simulated solar
light (AM 1.5) at 1 Sun intensity. These results indicated that current
densities of well over 1 mA cm–2 could be obtained
at 0 V bias in this system under illumination, with the current density
falling to zero when the light was turned off (Figure a, red line). These results were conducted
without any compensation for resistance, which was found to be around
14 Ω. Control experiments with an identical setup but using
a bare FTO electrode without WO3 (Figure a, black line) or with an FTO-WO3 electrode but with only 1 M methanesulfonic in the cathode compartment
(blue line) indicated that both the WO3 photoanode and
the ECPB were essential for observing photocurrent under these conditions.
Figure 3
(A) Chopped
light experiment in a two-electrode configuration at
0 V bias, according to the cell setup in Figure (red line). Black line: with H3PMo12O40 but using only FTO as the anode. Blue
line: with a WO3-FTO anode, but using no ECPB. (B) Chopped
light experiment in a two-electrode configuration, as above, but with
the bias potential varied from 0 to 0.5 V at a rate of 1 mV/s. Expansions
of the low current areas of both these graphs (so that the blue and
black traces can be seen more clearly) are given in Figures S2 and S3.
(A) Chopped
light experiment in a two-electrode configuration at
0 V bias, according to the cell setup in Figure (red line). Black line: with H3PMo12O40 but using only FTO as the anode. Blue
line: with a WO3-FTO anode, but using no ECPB. (B) Chopped
light experiment in a two-electrode configuration, as above, but with
the bias potential varied from 0 to 0.5 V at a rate of 1 mV/s. Expansions
of the low current areas of both these graphs (so that the blue and
black traces can be seen more clearly) are given in Figures S2 and S3.Figure (bottom)
shows a chopped light experiment obtained under the same conditions
as the red trace in Figure a, but this time with the bias voltage being swept from 0
to 0.5 V at a rate of 1 mV/s (a sweep over a wider range of potentials
is shown in Figures S4 and S5). Hence if
modest bias voltages are applied, current densities approaching 2.5
mA cm–2 can be obtained. These current densities
compare favorably with photocurrents obtained in three-electrode configurations
with WO3 photoanodes at low pH, for which maximum current
densities under high anodic bias normally plateau at ∼1 mA
cm–2.[10,11]During the chopped
light experiments described above, bubbling
was observed at the anode, while the cathode compartment turned from
yellow (characteristic of [PMo12O40]3–) to blue (indicating reduction to [PMo12O40]5–). In order to determine the nature of any gases
produced in either compartment, irradiation at 1 Sun and AM 1.5 was
conducted at 0 V bias, while the headspaces of the anode and cathode
chambers were investigated by gas chromatography and fluorescence
probe spectroscopy (see SI for details).
Gas chromatography indicated that oxygen gas was present in the anode
headspace, but no hydrogen gas could be detected in either compartment
headspace, suggesting that complete decoupling of the water oxidation
and proton reduction reactions had occurred in this step. Quantification
of the amount of oxygen evolved was possible using an O2 fluorescence-quench probe, and comparison with the total charge
passed during irradiation indicated that the Faradaic efficiency for
oxygen production by photolytic water splitting was 84% (±6%),
see Figure .
Figure 4
Comparison
of the amount of O2 expected in the cell
headspace on the basis of the charge passed (black dashed line) and
O2 detected in the cell headspace by fluorescence-quench
measurements (red line). Bubbles collected on the anode and were periodically
dislodged by shaking, accounting for the increments observed in the
measured O2 signal.
Comparison
of the amount of O2 expected in the cell
headspace on the basis of the charge passed (black dashed line) and
O2 detected in the cell headspace by fluorescence-quench
measurements (red line). Bubbles collected on the anode and were periodically
dislodged by shaking, accounting for the increments observed in the
measured O2 signal.These results suggest that solar-driven water oxidation can
be
coupled to reduction of [PMo12O40]3– to give a reduced ECPB without simultaneous hydrogen evolution,
such that gas mixing in a working device could be kept to a minimum
(even at current densities under irradiation on the order of only
1 mA cm–2).Our previous work[8a] demonstrated that
the reduced form of the ECPB ([PMo12O40]5–) is stable with respect to reoxidation in air on
the time scale of hours-to-days and gives clean reconversion to [PMo12O40]3– with concomitant H2 evolution (at 100% Faradaic yield) when oxidized electrochemically
at modest bias voltages. Hence, in order to demonstrate the feasibility
of the second main advantage of this approach (generation of hydrogen
by reoxidation of the ECPB in a separate device to the solar-harvesting
array), we reoxidized the [PMo12O40]5– produced during water oxidation electrochemically in a cell containing
the reduced [PMo12O40]5– buffer
in one compartment and 1 M methanesulfonic acid in the other at +0.75
V vs Ag/AgCl (see section SI-6 in the SI). Complete reoxidation was gauged by achieving a low steady-state
background current and by return of the ECPB to its original yellow
color. Comparison of the charge passed during reoxidation and the
amount of hydrogen evolved revealed full Faradaic efficiency for decoupled
H2 production. The charge passed during reoxidation was
also identical to the charge passed during initial reduction of the
ECPB during the photodriven water oxidation step. Hence this ECPB
makes a good mediator for potential solar-to-hydrogen applications,
greatly reducing gas crossover and allowing O2 and H2 to be generated at different rates and at different times
on account of these two processes being electrochemically decoupled.
A rough estimation of the overall efficiency of this system (energy
in vs energy out) gives a figure of between 1 and 2% (see SI).In summary, we have demonstrated that
a combined solar-electrochemical
system that uses an ECPB to decouple the half reactions of water splitting
is feasible. The potential benefits of this approach include reduced
gas mixing at low current densities (due to decoupling of the half-reactions),
the potential for hydrogen to be generated more rapidly than the oxygen
(i.e., at a rate which is not limited by the solar flux), and the
ability to generate the hydrogen at a time and place distinct from
the large surface-area solar-harvesting array (for ease of collection
and pressurization, and for the most effective use of the electrochemical
cell and its components). A further benefit may include the ability
to use membranes other than Nafion in the large area array, as the
gas permeability of the membrane is less of an issue if oxygen evolution
and hydrogen evolution are decoupled (the separator need only prevent
the ECPB from accessing the anode compartment). Cheaper separators
are highly desirable if large area arrays are to be made affordable,
and one such cheap candidate material for this role is cellulose,
which we have already demonstrated performs similarly to Nafion in
decoupled water splitting mediated by [PMo12O40]3–.[8a] Certain key challenges
still remain in this approach (especially regarding increasing the
current densities for water oxidation), and efforts toward improving
this system are currently underway in our laboratories.
Authors: Timothy R Cook; Dilek K Dogutan; Steven Y Reece; Yogesh Surendranath; Thomas S Teets; Daniel G Nocera Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Karl Walczak; Yikai Chen; Christoph Karp; Jeffrey W Beeman; Matthew Shaner; Joshua Spurgeon; Ian D Sharp; Xenia Amashukeli; William West; Jian Jin; Nathan S Lewis; Chengxiang Xiang Journal: ChemSusChem Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 8.928
Authors: Moreno de Respinis; Gregory De Temmerman; Irem Tanyeli; Mauritius C M van de Sanden; Russ P Doerner; Matthew J Baldwin; Roel van de Krol Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Sebastian Amthor; Sebastian Knoll; Magdalena Heiland; Linda Zedler; Chunyu Li; Djawed Nauroozi; Willi Tobaschus; Alexander K Mengele; Montaha Anjass; Ulrich S Schubert; Benjamin Dietzek-Ivanšić; Sven Rau; Carsten Streb Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 24.274
Authors: Fei Wang; Hongyuan Sheng; Wenjie Li; James B Gerken; Song Jin; Shannon S Stahl Journal: ACS Energy Lett Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 23.101
Authors: Salam Maloul; Matthias van den Borg; Carolin Müller; Linda Zedler; Alexander K Mengele; Daniel Gaissmaier; Timo Jacob; Sven Rau; Benjamin Dietzek-Ivanšić; Carsten Streb Journal: Chemistry Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 5.020