Literature DB >> 23282364

Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation.

Joeri Rogelj1, David L McCollum, Andy Reisinger, Malte Meinshausen, Keywan Riahi.   

Abstract

For more than a decade, the target of keeping global warming below 2 °C has been a key focus of the international climate debate. In response, the scientific community has published a number of scenario studies that estimate the costs of achieving such a target. Producing these estimates remains a challenge, particularly because of relatively well known, but poorly quantified, uncertainties, and owing to limited integration of scientific knowledge across disciplines. The integrated assessment community, on the one hand, has extensively assessed the influence of technological and socio-economic uncertainties on low-carbon scenarios and associated costs. The climate modelling community, on the other hand, has spent years improving its understanding of the geophysical response of the Earth system to emissions of greenhouse gases. This geophysical response remains a key uncertainty in the cost of mitigation scenarios but has been integrated with assessments of other uncertainties in only a rudimentary manner, that is, for equilibrium conditions. Here we bridge this gap between the two research communities by generating distributions of the costs associated with limiting transient global temperature increase to below specific values, taking into account uncertainties in four factors: geophysical, technological, social and political. We find that political choices that delay mitigation have the largest effect on the cost-risk distribution, followed by geophysical uncertainties, social factors influencing future energy demand and, lastly, technological uncertainties surrounding the availability of greenhouse gas mitigation options. Our information on temperature risk and mitigation costs provides crucial information for policy-making, because it clarifies the relative importance of mitigation costs, energy demand and the timing of global action in reducing the risk of exceeding a global temperature increase of 2 °C, or other limits such as 3 °C or 1.5 °C, across a wide range of scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23282364     DOI: 10.1038/nature11787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  2 in total

1.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 degrees C.

Authors:  Malte Meinshausen; Nicolai Meinshausen; William Hare; Sarah C B Raper; Katja Frieler; Reto Knutti; David J Frame; Myles R Allen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options.

Authors:  Brian C O'Neill; Keywan Riahi; Ilkka Keppo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total
  21 in total

1.  Disentangling the effects of CO2 and short-lived climate forcer mitigation.

Authors:  Joeri Rogelj; Michiel Schaeffer; Malte Meinshausen; Drew T Shindell; William Hare; Zbigniew Klimont; Guus J M Velders; Markus Amann; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Earth science: A holistic approach to climate targets.

Authors:  Joeri Rogelj
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Modeling technical change in climate analysis: evidence from agricultural crop damages.

Authors:  Adeel Ahmed; Evelyn S Devadason; Abul Quasem Al-Amin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets.

Authors:  Marshall Burke; W Matthew Davis; Noah S Diffenbaugh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Climate change: All in the timing.

Authors:  Steve Hatfield-Dodds
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C.

Authors:  Joeri Rogelj; Michel den Elzen; Niklas Höhne; Taryn Fransen; Hanna Fekete; Harald Winkler; Roberto Schaeffer; Fu Sha; Keywan Riahi; Malte Meinshausen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Synthetic circuit designs for earth terraformation.

Authors:  Ricard V Solé; Raúl Montañez; Salva Duran-Nebreda
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  The Carbon Footprint of Conference Papers.

Authors:  Diomidis Spinellis; Panos Louridas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characterization of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) leaf senescence: implications for biofuel production.

Authors:  Maria Thereza Bazzo Martins; Wagner Rodrigo de Souza; Bárbara Andrade Dias Brito da Cunha; Marcos Fernando Basso; Nelson Geraldo de Oliveira; Felipe Vinecky; Polyana Kelly Martins; Patrícia Abrão de Oliveira; Bruna Cersózimo Arenque-Musa; Amanda Pereira de Souza; Marcos Silveira Buckeridge; Adilson Kenji Kobayashi; Betania Ferraz Quirino; Hugo Bruno Correa Molinari
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Implication of Paris Agreement in the context of long-term climate mitigation goals.

Authors:  Shinichiro Fujimori; Xuanming Su; Jing-Yu Liu; Tomoko Hasegawa; Kiyoshi Takahashi; Toshihiko Masui; Maho Takimi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.