Literature DB >> 27158249

Endophytic Phytoaugmentation: Treating Wastewater and Runoff Through Augmented Phytoremediation.

Lauren K Redfern1, Claudia K Gunsch1.   

Abstract

Limited options exist for efficiently and effectively treating water runoff from agricultural fields and landfills. Traditional treatments include excavation, transport to landfills, incineration, stabilization, and vitrification. In general, treatment options relying on biological methods such as bioremediation have the ability to be applied in situ and offer a sustainable remedial option with a lower environmental impact and reduced long-term operating expenses. These methods are generally considered ecologically friendly, particularly when compared to traditional physicochemical cleanup options. Phytoremediation, which relies on plants to take up and/or transform the contaminant of interest, is another alternative treatment method which has been developed. However, phytoremediation is not widely used, largely due to its low treatment efficiency. Endophytic phytoaugmentation is a variation on phytoremediation that relies on augmenting the phytoremediating plants with exogenous strains to stimulate associated plant-microbe interactions to facilitate and improve remediation efficiency. In this review, we offer a summary of the current knowledge as well as developments in endophytic phytoaugmentation and present some potential future applications for this technology. There has been a limited number of published endophytic phytoaugmentation case studies and much remains to be done to transition lab-scale results to field applications. Future research needs include large-scale endophytic phytoaugmentation experiments as well as the development of more exhaustive tools for monitoring plant-microbe-pollutant interactions.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27158249      PMCID: PMC4835827          DOI: 10.1089/ind.2015.0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ind Biotechnol (New Rochelle N Y)        ISSN: 1550-9087


  62 in total

1.  Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources.

Authors:  A P Davis; M Shokouhian; S Ni
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products.

Authors:  Gary Strobel; Bryn Daisy
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  An economic analysis of leachate purification through willow-coppice vegetation filters.

Authors:  Håkan Rosenqvist; Barry Ness
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 4.  Endophytic bacteria and their potential application to improve the phytoremediation of contaminated environments.

Authors:  Chiara Mastretta; Tanja Barac; Jaco Vangronsveld; Lee Newman; Safiyh Taghavi; Daniel Van der Lelie
Journal:  Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev       Date:  2006

5.  Genetic bioaugmentation as an effective method for in situ bioremediation: functionality of catabolic plasmids following conjugal transfers.

Authors:  Kaoru Ikuma; Claudia K Gunsch
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 6.  Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts.

Authors:  Mónica Rosenblueth; Esperanza Martínez-Romero
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Potential of the TCE-degrading endophyte Pseudomonas putida W619-TCE to improve plant growth and reduce TCE phytotoxicity and evapotranspiration in poplar cuttings.

Authors:  Nele Weyens; Sascha Truyens; Joke Dupae; Lee Newman; Safiyh Taghavi; Daniel van der Lelie; Robert Carleer; Jaco Vangronsveld
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  An engineered plant that accumulates higher levels of heavy metals than Thlaspi caerulescens, with yields of 100 times more biomass in mine soils.

Authors:  Mar Martínez; Pilar Bernal; Concepción Almela; Dinoraz Vélez; Pilar García-Agustín; Ramón Serrano; Juan Navarro-Aviñó
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Impact of agricultural practices on the Zea mays L. endophytic community.

Authors:  Dave Seghers; Lieven Wittebolle; Eva M Top; Willy Verstraete; Steven D Siciliano
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Bacterial endophyte-mediated naphthalene phytoprotection and phytoremediation.

Authors:  Kieran J Germaine; Elaine Keogh; David Ryan; David N Dowling
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Cd- and Pb-resistant endophytic fungi on growth and phytoextraction of Brassica napus in metal-contaminated soils.

Authors:  Yanan Shi; Huarong Xie; Lixiang Cao; Renduo Zhang; Zaichao Xu; Zhuoya Wang; Zujun Deng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Phenol Removal Capacity of the Common Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) and Six Phenol-Resistant Bacterial Strains From Its Rhizosphere: In Vitro Evaluation at High Phenol Concentrations.

Authors:  Olga Radulović; Slaviša Stanković; Branka Uzelac; Vojin Tadić; Milana Trifunović-Momčilov; Jelena Lozo; Marija Marković
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.