Pierre Imbert1, Christian Lutz2, Matthew Daggett3, Lucas Niglis2, Benjamin Freychet4, François Dalmay5, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet4. 1. I.C.A.P.S. Sports Traumatology and Joint Surgery Institute of Saint-Raphaël, Pôle Médical des Specialités, Saint-Raphaël, France. Electronic address: imbertpierre@hotmail.com. 2. Clinique du Diaconat, ICOSS 50, Strasbourg, France. 3. Kansas City University, Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A. 4. Générale de Santé, Hopital privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopedique Santy, Lyon, France. 5. UMR Inserm 1094, Faculté de Médecine, Limoges Cedex, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To measure the variations in length during flexion and internal tibial rotation of the 3 different femoral insertions of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) while maintaining a fixed tibia insertion. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaver knees were analyzed using a navigation system. Maximal distance variations of the 3 different anatomic femoral insertions of the ALL were measured during knee flexion and internal tibial rotation at 20° (IR20°) and 90° (IR90°). The 3 different femoral attachments were, as published, at the center of the lateral epicondyle, distal and anterior from this position, and proximal and posterior. Each of these 3 femoral insertions was coupled to the same tibial insertion at the tibial margin, halfway between the tip of the fibular head and the prominence of the Gerdy tubercle. RESULTS: During IR20°, variation in the distance between paired points is not different between the proximal-posterior, epicondyle, and distal-anterior femoral insertions. These variations were statistically different during IR90° for the 3 different femoral locations. In increasing degrees of flexion, there was a length decrease between paired points observed with the proximal-posterior position. A length increase was observed for both the epicondyle location and the distal-anterior location. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL did not reveal an isometric behavior at any of the femoral insertion locations but had different length change patterns during knee flexion and internal tibial rotation at 90°. The proximal and posterior to epicondyle femoral position is the only position with a favorable isometry, as shown by being tight in extension and in internal rotation at 20° and then relaxed when the knee goes to flexion at 120° and during internal rotation at 90°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical relevance is significant with respect to optimizing the femoral position of an ALL reconstruction.
PURPOSE: To measure the variations in length during flexion and internal tibial rotation of the 3 different femoral insertions of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) while maintaining a fixed tibia insertion. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaver knees were analyzed using a navigation system. Maximal distance variations of the 3 different anatomic femoral insertions of the ALL were measured during knee flexion and internal tibial rotation at 20° (IR20°) and 90° (IR90°). The 3 different femoral attachments were, as published, at the center of the lateral epicondyle, distal and anterior from this position, and proximal and posterior. Each of these 3 femoral insertions was coupled to the same tibial insertion at the tibial margin, halfway between the tip of the fibular head and the prominence of the Gerdy tubercle. RESULTS: During IR20°, variation in the distance between paired points is not different between the proximal-posterior, epicondyle, and distal-anterior femoral insertions. These variations were statistically different during IR90° for the 3 different femoral locations. In increasing degrees of flexion, there was a length decrease between paired points observed with the proximal-posterior position. A length increase was observed for both the epicondyle location and the distal-anterior location. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL did not reveal an isometric behavior at any of the femoral insertion locations but had different length change patterns during knee flexion and internal tibial rotation at 90°. The proximal and posterior to epicondyle femoral position is the only position with a favorable isometry, as shown by being tight in extension and in internal rotation at 20° and then relaxed when the knee goes to flexion at 120° and during internal rotation at 90°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical relevance is significant with respect to optimizing the femoral position of an ALL reconstruction.
Authors: Robert N Kent; James F Boorman-Padgett; Ran Thein; Jelle P van der List; Danyal H Nawabi; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Carl W Imhauser; Andrew D Pearle Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Willem A Kernkamp; Samuel K Van de Velde; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Peter D Asnis; Rob G H H Nelissen; Robert F LaPrade; Bertram Zarins; Guoan Li Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Willem A Kernkamp; Samuel K Van de Velde; Ali Hosseini; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Jing-Sheng Li; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Guoan Li Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Andrea Ferretti; Edoardo Monaco; Antonio Ponzo; Matthew Dagget; Matteo Guzzini; Daniele Mazza; Andrea Redler; Fabio Conteduca Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.075