Taku Hatta1, Hugo Giambini2, Alexander W Hooke1, Chunfeng Zhao1, John W Sperling3, Scott P Steinmann3, Nobuyuki Yamamoto4, Eiji Itoi4, Kai-Nan An5. 1. Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A. 2. Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. 5. Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.. Electronic address: an.kainan@mayo.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the alteration of passive stiffness in the supraspinatus muscle after double-row (DR) and knotless transosseous-equivalent (KL-TOE) repair techniques, using shear wave elastography (SWE) in cadavers with rotator cuff tears. We also aimed to compare altered muscular stiffness after these repairs to that obtained from shoulders with intact rotator cuff tendon. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders with rotator cuff tear (tear size: small [6], medium-large [6]) were used. Passive stiffness of 4 anatomic regions in the supraspinatus muscle was measured based on an established SWE method. Each specimen underwent DR and KL-TOE footprint repairs at 30° glenohumeral abduction. SWE values, obtained at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90° abduction, were assessed in 3 different conditions: preoperative (torn) and postoperative conditions with the 2 techniques. The increased ratio of SWE values after repair was compared among the 4 regions to assess stiffness distribution. In addition, SWE values were obtained on 12 shoulders with intact rotator cuff tendons as control. RESULTS: In shoulders with medium-large-sized tears, supraspinatus muscles showed an increased passive stiffness after rotator cuff repairs, and this was significantly observed at adducted positions. KL-TOE repair showed uniform stiffness changes among the 4 regions of the supraspinatus muscle (mean, 189% to 218% increase after repair), whereas DR repair caused a significantly heterogeneous stiffness distribution within the muscle (mean, 187% to 319% after repair, P = .002). Although a repair-induced increase in muscle stiffness was observed also in small-sized tears, there were no significant differences in repaired stiffness changes between DR and KL-TOE (mean, 127% to 138% and 127% to 130% after repairs, respectively). Shoulders with intact rotator cuff tendon showed uniform SWE values among the 4 regions of the supraspinatus muscle (mean, 38.2 to 43.0 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: Passive stiffness of the supraspinatus muscle increases after rotator cuff repairs for medium-large-sized tears. KL-TOE technique for the medium-large-sized tear provided a more uniform stiffness distribution across the repaired supraspinatus muscles compared with the DR technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on this insight, investigating rotator cuff muscle stiffness changes, further studies using SWE may determine the optimal repair technique for various sizes of rotator cuff tears.
PURPOSE: To investigate the alteration of passive stiffness in the supraspinatus muscle after double-row (DR) and knotless transosseous-equivalent (KL-TOE) repair techniques, using shear wave elastography (SWE) in cadavers with rotator cuff tears. We also aimed to compare altered muscular stiffness after these repairs to that obtained from shoulders with intact rotator cuff tendon. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders with rotator cuff tear (tear size: small [6], medium-large [6]) were used. Passive stiffness of 4 anatomic regions in the supraspinatus muscle was measured based on an established SWE method. Each specimen underwent DR and KL-TOE footprint repairs at 30° glenohumeral abduction. SWE values, obtained at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90° abduction, were assessed in 3 different conditions: preoperative (torn) and postoperative conditions with the 2 techniques. The increased ratio of SWE values after repair was compared among the 4 regions to assess stiffness distribution. In addition, SWE values were obtained on 12 shoulders with intact rotator cuff tendons as control. RESULTS: In shoulders with medium-large-sized tears, supraspinatus muscles showed an increased passive stiffness after rotator cuff repairs, and this was significantly observed at adducted positions. KL-TOE repair showed uniform stiffness changes among the 4 regions of the supraspinatus muscle (mean, 189% to 218% increase after repair), whereas DR repair caused a significantly heterogeneous stiffness distribution within the muscle (mean, 187% to 319% after repair, P = .002). Although a repair-induced increase in muscle stiffness was observed also in small-sized tears, there were no significant differences in repaired stiffness changes between DR and KL-TOE (mean, 127% to 138% and 127% to 130% after repairs, respectively). Shoulders with intact rotator cuff tendon showed uniform SWE values among the 4 regions of the supraspinatus muscle (mean, 38.2 to 43.0 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: Passive stiffness of the supraspinatus muscle increases after rotator cuff repairs for medium-large-sized tears. KL-TOE technique for the medium-large-sized tear provided a more uniform stiffness distribution across the repaired supraspinatus muscles compared with the DR technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on this insight, investigating rotator cuff muscle stiffness changes, further studies using SWE may determine the optimal repair technique for various sizes of rotator cuff tears.
Authors: Maxwell C Park; Neal S ElAttrache; James E Tibone; Christopher S Ahmad; Bong-Jae Jun; Thay Q Lee Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2007-02-22 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Bruce S Miller; Brian K Downie; Robert B Kohen; Theresa Kijek; Bryson Lesniak; Jon A Jacobson; Richard E Hughes; James E Carpenter Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jonathan T Nassos; Neal S ElAttrache; Michael J Angel; James E Tibone; Orr Limpisvasti; Thay Q Lee Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Shane J Nho; Ronald S Adler; Daniel P Tomlinson; Answorth A Allen; Frank A Cordasco; Russell F Warren; David W Altchek; John D MacGillivray Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Mena M Mesiha; Kathleen A Derwin; Scott C Sibole; Ahmet Erdemir; Jesse A McCarron Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Christoph Bartl; Pannos Kouloumentas; Konstantin Holzapfel; Stefan Eichhorn; Klaus Wörtler; Andreas Imhoff; Gian M Salzmann Journal: Int J Shoulder Surg Date: 2012-01
Authors: Timothy G Baumer; Jack Dischler; Leah Davis; Yassin Labyed; Daniel S Siegal; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Vasilios Moutzouros; Michael J Bey Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 3.494