Literature DB >> 19531660

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective evaluation with sequential ultrasonography.

Shane J Nho1, Ronald S Adler, Daniel P Tomlinson, Answorth A Allen, Frank A Cordasco, Russell F Warren, David W Altchek, John D MacGillivray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated predictable healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a single time point, but few studies have evaluated tendon healing over time. HYPOTHESIS: Rotator cuff tears that are intact on ultrasound at 1 time point will remain intact, and clinical results will improve regardless of healing status. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: The Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Registry was established to determine the effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with clinical outcomes using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and ultrasound at 1 and 2 years, postoperatively. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on ultrasound appearance: group 1, rotator cuff tendon intact at 1 and 2 years (n = 63); group 2, rotator cuff tendon defect at 1 and 2 years (n = 23); group 3, rotator cuff tendon defect at 1 year but no defect at 2 years (n = 7).
RESULTS: The ultrasound appearance was consistent at 1 and 2 years for 86 of the 93 patients (92.5%). The patients in group 1 had a significantly lower mean age (57.8 +/- 9.8 years) than the patients of group 2 (63.6 +/- 8.6 years; P = .04). Group 2 had a significantly greater rotator cuff tear size (4.36 +/- 1.6 cm) than group 1 (2.84 +/- 1.1 cm; P = .00025). Each group had a significant improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores from baseline to 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION All intact rotator cuff tendons at 1 year remained intact at 2 years. A small group of patients with postoperative imaging did not appear healed by ultrasound at 1 year but did so at 2 years. Patients demonstrated improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scores, range of motion, and strength, regardless of tendon healing status on ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19531660     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509335764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  Outcome of open massive rotator cuff repairs with double-row suture knotless anchors: case series.

Authors:  Tara M Connelly; Aileen Shaw; Paul O'Grady
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of Passive Stiffness Changes in the Supraspinatus Muscle After Double-Row and Knotless Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Taku Hatta; Hugo Giambini; Alexander W Hooke; Chunfeng Zhao; John W Sperling; Scott P Steinmann; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Eiji Itoi; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Clinical and structural evaluation of arthroscopic double-row suture-bridge rotator cuff repair: early results of a novel technique.

Authors:  H El-Azab; S Buchmann; K Beitzel; S Waldt; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effectiveness of subacromial anti-adhesive agent injection after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective randomized comparison study.

Authors:  Chung Hee Oh; Joo Han Oh; Sae Hoon Kim; Jae Hwan Cho; Jong Pil Yoon; Joon Yub Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

5.  The influence of age, delay of repair, and tendon involvement in acute rotator cuff tears: structural and clinical outcomes after repair of 42 shoulders.

Authors:  Hanna C Björnsson; Rolf Norlin; Kajsa Johansson; Lars E Adolfsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous equivalent suture bridge double row rotator cuff repair: a prospective study and short-term results.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelnabi Imam; Ashraf Abdelkafy
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-02-15

7.  Shoulder ultrasonography performed by orthopedic surgeons increases efficiency in diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chiu; Poyu Chen; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Kuo-Yao Hsu; Shih-Sheng Chang; Yi-Sheng Chan; Yeung-Jen Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: importance of functional recovery by 3 months after surgery.

Authors:  Yosuke Nakamura; Masafumi Gotoh; Yasuhiro Mitsui; Hidehiro Nakamura; Hiroki Ohzono; Takahiro Okawa; Naoto Shiba
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Surgical Options for Failed Rotator Cuff Repair, except Arthroplasty: Review of Current Methods.

Authors:  Jangwoo Kim; Yunki Ryu; Sae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-02-21

10.  The WORC Index and Predicting Treatment Failure in Patients Undergoing Primary Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Matthew J Herring; Melissa White; Jonathan P Braman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.