Literature DB >> 27157243

Implicit modeling of screw threads for efficient finite element analysis of complex bone-implant systems.

Jason A Inzana1, Peter Varga2, Markus Windolf3.   

Abstract

Finite element analysis is commonly used to assist in the development and evaluation of orthopedic devices. The physics of these models are simplified through approximations that enable more efficient simulations, without compromising the accuracy of the relative comparisons between implant designs or configurations. This study developed and evaluated a technique to approximate the behavior of a finely threaded screw using a smooth cylinder with the threads implicitly represented through interfacial contact conditions. This pseudo-threaded model was calibrated by comparing to simulations that explicitly modeled the thread geometry with frictional contact. A parametric analysis was performed with a single screw-in-bone system, five loading directions, and three Young׳s moduli that span the range of cancellous bone (200, 600, and 1,000MPa). Considering that screw cut-out from cancellous bone is a critical clinical issue in the osteoporotic proximal humerus, the pseudo-threaded model was compared with a bonded interface to examine three different screw configurations in a 3-part proximal humerus fracture across 10 patients. In the single screw-in-bone system, the pseudo-threaded model predicted the screw displacement of the explicitly threaded model with 1-5% difference and estimated the strain distributions and magnitudes more accurately than a bonded interface. Yet, the relative comparisons of implant stability across the three different screw configurations in the proximal humerus were not affected by the modeling choice for the bone-screw interface. Therefore, the bonded interface could serve as a more efficient methodology for making relative comparisons between implants that utilize the same thread profile.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone–screw interface; Continuum finite element analysis; Fracture fixation; Proximal humerus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27157243     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Comparative FE biomechanical and microbial adhesion analyses on an implanted humerus.

Authors:  A Tropea; A Tisano; A Bruschetta; D Borzelli; A Migliorato; G Nirta; G Leonardi; F Trimarchi; A Alito
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling: Augmenting proximal humerus fracture plating.

Authors:  Peter Varga; Jason A Inzana; James W A Fletcher; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Armin Runer; Norbert P Südkamp; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 3.  The Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Yongyu Ye; Wei You; Weimin Zhu; Jiaming Cui; Kang Chen; Daping Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Newly designed anterolateral and posterolateral locking anatomic plates for lateral tibial plateau fractures: a finite element study.

Authors:  Pengbo Chen; Hua Lu; Hao Shen; Wei Wang; Binbin Ni; Jishizhan Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Influence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate design on torque and compression relationship.

Authors:  Miguel A Diaz; Jason E Hsu; Eric T Ricchetti; Grant E Garrigues; Sergio Gutierrez; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-04-28

6.  A finite element analysis of relationship between fracture, implant and tibial tunnel.

Authors:  Yiqun Wang; Erpeng Qi; Lianyou Wang; Jiahe Tian; Xiaojun Zhang; Lu Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

8.  Impact of Modeling Assumptions on Stability Predictions in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mehul A Dharia; Jeffrey E Bischoff; David Schneider
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Biomechanical comparison of five cannulated screw fixation strategies for young vertical femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Dajun Jiang; Shi Zhan; Lei Wang; Lewis L Shi; Ming Ling; Hai Hu; Weitao Jia
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.