Elizabeth H Stephens1, Michael P Robich2, Dustin M Walters3, Walter F DeNino4, Muhammad Aftab5, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili6, Amanda L Eilers7, Robert D Rice8, Andrew B Goldstone9, Ryan C Shlestad5, Tarek Malas10, Marisa Cevasco11, Erin A Gillaspie12, Amy G Fiedler13, Damien J LaPar14, Asad A Shah15. 1. Columbia University, New York, New York. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine. 3. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 4. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 5. University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado. 6. University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 7. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 8. Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, Texas. 9. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 10. Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 11. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 12. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 13. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 14. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. 15. Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: asad.shah@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cardiothoracic surgical workforce is changing. Although 5% of practicing surgeons are women, 20% of current cardiothoracic surgery residents are women. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of gender on specialty interest, satisfaction, and career pathways of current residents. METHODS: Responses to the mandatory 2015 Thoracic Surgery Residents Association/Thoracic Surgery Directors Association in-training examination survey taken by 354 residents (100% response rate) were evaluated. The influence of gender was assessed with the use of standard univariate analyses. RESULTS: Women accounted for 20% of residents, and the percentage did not vary with postgraduate year or program type (traditional versus integrated). Although no differences were found between the genders related to specialty interest, academic versus private practice career, or pursuit of additional training, women were more likely to pursue additional training in minimally invasive thoracic surgery (10% versus 2.5%, p = 0.001) and less likely to perform research in their careers (65% versus 88%, p = 0.043). Although women were equally satisfied with their career choice, had similar numbers of interviews and job offers, and felt equally prepared for their boards, graduating women felt less prepared technically (77% versus 90%, p = 0.01) and for practicing independently (71% versus 87%, p = 0.01). Women were less likely to be married (26% versus 62%, p < 0.001) and have children (19% versus 49%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although career satisfaction and specialty interest were similar between the genders, women were less likely to intend to perform research during their careers despite similar previous research experience. Women also demonstrated lower rates of marriage and childbearing compared with their male counterparts.
BACKGROUND: The cardiothoracic surgical workforce is changing. Although 5% of practicing surgeons are women, 20% of current cardiothoracic surgery residents are women. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of gender on specialty interest, satisfaction, and career pathways of current residents. METHODS: Responses to the mandatory 2015 Thoracic Surgery Residents Association/Thoracic Surgery Directors Association in-training examination survey taken by 354 residents (100% response rate) were evaluated. The influence of gender was assessed with the use of standard univariate analyses. RESULTS:Women accounted for 20% of residents, and the percentage did not vary with postgraduate year or program type (traditional versus integrated). Although no differences were found between the genders related to specialty interest, academic versus private practice career, or pursuit of additional training, women were more likely to pursue additional training in minimally invasive thoracic surgery (10% versus 2.5%, p = 0.001) and less likely to perform research in their careers (65% versus 88%, p = 0.043). Although women were equally satisfied with their career choice, had similar numbers of interviews and job offers, and felt equally prepared for their boards, graduating women felt less prepared technically (77% versus 90%, p = 0.01) and for practicing independently (71% versus 87%, p = 0.01). Women were less likely to be married (26% versus 62%, p < 0.001) and have children (19% versus 49%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although career satisfaction and specialty interest were similar between the genders, women were less likely to intend to perform research during their careers despite similar previous research experience. Women also demonstrated lower rates of marriage and childbearing compared with their male counterparts.
Authors: Carlo Maria Rosati; Leonidas G Koniaris; Daniela Molena; David Blitzer; Katherine W Su; Mohammad Tahboub; Panos N Vardas; Leonard N Girardi; Mario Gaudino Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Laura Banks; Varinder K Randhawa; Jessica Caterini; Tracey J F Colella; Savita Dhanvantari; Sean McMurtry; Kim A Connelly; Lisa Robinson; Sonia S Anand; Maral Ouzounian; Shelley Zieroth; Susanna Mak; Sharon Straus; Michelle M Graham Journal: CJC Open Date: 2020-07-02
Authors: Cherie P Erkmen; Katherine A Ortmeyer; Glenn J Pelletier; Ourania Preventza; David T Cooke Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Alysse G Wurcel; Julia Zubiago; Jessica Reyes; Emma Smyth; Keki R Balsara; Danielle Avila; Joshua A Barocas; Curt G Beckwith; Jenny Bui; Cody A Chastain; Ellen F Eaton; Simeon Kimmel; Molly L Paras; Asher J Schranz; Darshali A Vyas; Alison Rapoport Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 5.102
Authors: Jennifer Hunter; Helen Crofts; Alysha Keehn; Sofie Schlagintweit; Jessica G Y Luc; Kelly A Lefaivre Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Devyani Chowdhury; Jonathan N Johnson; Carissa M Baker-Smith; Robert D B Jaquiss; Arjun K Mahendran; Valerie Curren; Aarti Bhat; Angira Patel; Audrey C Marshall; Stephanie Fuller; Bradley S Marino; Christina M Fink; Keila N Lopez; Lowell H Frank; Mishaal Ather; Natalie Torentinos; Olivia Kranz; Vivian Thorne; Ryan R Davies; Stuart Berger; Christopher Snyder; Arwa Saidi; Kenneth Shaffer Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Adishesh K Narahari; J Hunter Mehaffey; Anirudha S Chandrabhatla; Robert B Hawkins; Eric J Charles; Mark E Roeser; Christine Lau; Gorav Ailawadi Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 5.209