Sarah Power1, Alessandra Biondi2,3, Isil Saatci4, Kathleen Bennett5, Jeyaledchumy Mahadevan6, Anne Christine Januel7, Sirintara Pongpech Singhara Na Ayudhaya8,9, Ronit Agid10,11. 1. Department of Radiology, 57978Beaumont Hospital, Ireland. 2. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Besançon University Hospital, France. 3. School of Medicine, 27000Franche Comté University, France. 4. Interventional Neuroradiology Section, Koru Hospitals, Turkey. 5. Data Science Centre, 8863Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland. 6. Department of Radiology, 69976Pantai Hospital, Malaysia. 7. Service de Neuroradiologie Interventionnelle, 36760Hôpital Universitaire de Toulouse, France. 8. Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand. 9. Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, 26687Mahidol University, Thailand. 10. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital, Canada. 11. 7938The University of Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Women's representation in medicine has increased over time yet the proportion of women practicing neurointervention remains low. We conducted an anonymous online survey through which we could explore the gender gap in neurointervention, identify potential issues, difficulties, or obstacles women might face, and evaluate if men encounter similar issues. METHODS: An online questionnaire was designed in SurveyMonkey®. Invitation to participate was emailed through national and international neurointerventional societies as well as directly through private mailing lists to men and women working in neurointervention. Responses were collected from 10 May 2019 to 10 September 2019. RESULTS: There were 295 complete responses, 173 (59%) male and 122 (41%) female. Most respondents (83%) fell within age categories 35-60 years, with representation from 40 countries across five continents. In all 95% were working full time, 73% had worked as a neurointerventionalist for >6 years, 77% worked in University-affiliated teaching institutions. Almost half of the respondents indicated no female neurointerventionalist worked in their center. Female respondents were younger and age-adjusted analysis was undertaken. Significantly fewer females than males were married and had children. Significantly fewer females held supervisory roles, held academic titles, and significantly less had a mentor. Females were less satisfied in their careers. More females felt they receive less recognition than colleagues of the opposite sex. Males had a greater proportion of work time dedicated to neurointervention. Similar proportions of both genders experienced bullying in work (40%-47%); however, sexual harassment was more common for females. There were no differences between genders in how they dealt with complications or their effects on mental well-being. CONCLUSION: There are many potential reasons why women are underrepresented in neurointervention, however, the literature suggests this is not unique to our specialty. Multiple long-term strategies will be necessary to address these issues, some of which are discussed in the article.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Women's representation in medicine has increased over time yet the proportion of women practicing neurointervention remains low. We conducted an anonymous online survey through which we could explore the gender gap in neurointervention, identify potential issues, difficulties, or obstacles women might face, and evaluate if men encounter similar issues. METHODS: An online questionnaire was designed in SurveyMonkey®. Invitation to participate was emailed through national and international neurointerventional societies as well as directly through private mailing lists to men and women working in neurointervention. Responses were collected from 10 May 2019 to 10 September 2019. RESULTS: There were 295 complete responses, 173 (59%) male and 122 (41%) female. Most respondents (83%) fell within age categories 35-60 years, with representation from 40 countries across five continents. In all 95% were working full time, 73% had worked as a neurointerventionalist for >6 years, 77% worked in University-affiliated teaching institutions. Almost half of the respondents indicated no female neurointerventionalist worked in their center. Female respondents were younger and age-adjusted analysis was undertaken. Significantly fewer females than males were married and had children. Significantly fewer females held supervisory roles, held academic titles, and significantly less had a mentor. Females were less satisfied in their careers. More females felt they receive less recognition than colleagues of the opposite sex. Males had a greater proportion of work time dedicated to neurointervention. Similar proportions of both genders experienced bullying in work (40%-47%); however, sexual harassment was more common for females. There were no differences between genders in how they dealt with complications or their effects on mental well-being. CONCLUSION: There are many potential reasons why women are underrepresented in neurointervention, however, the literature suggests this is not unique to our specialty. Multiple long-term strategies will be necessary to address these issues, some of which are discussed in the article.
Authors: Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; Stephen Balter; Robert Dixon; Renato Padovani; Beth Schueler; John F Cardella; Thierry de Baère Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Heather J Furnas; Rebecca M Garza; Alexander Y Li; Debra J Johnson; Anureet K Bajaj; Loree K Kalliainen; Jane S Weston; David H Song; Kevin C Chung; Rod J Rohrich Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Jennifer A Sweet; Vanessa Milanese Holanda; Ganesh Rao; Steven N Kalkanis; Ashwini D Sharan; Deborah L Benzil Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Amalia Cochran; Tricia Hauschild; William B Elder; Leigh A Neumayer; Karen J Brasel; Marie L Crandall Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Simone Dahrouge; Emily Seale; William Hogg; Grant Russell; Jaime Younger; Elizabeth Muggah; David Ponka; Jay Mercer Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Pravesh S Gadjradj; Roshni H S Matawlie; Ishitari Voigt; Biswadjiet S Harhangi; Carmen L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Rina Dutta; Sarah L Hawkes; Elizabeth Kuipers; David Guest; Nicola T Fear; Amy C Iversen Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 2.463