Literature DB >> 27156828

Frailty Status and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Chetan P Huded1, Jill M Huded2, Julie L Friedman3, Lillian R Benck3, Lee A Lindquist4, Thomas A Holly5, Ranya N Sweis5, Mark J Ricciardi5, S Chris Malaisrie5, Charles J Davidson5, James D Flaherty6.   

Abstract

Frailty is a syndrome of older adults associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the impact of frailty status on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We reviewed all 191 patients who underwent a modified Fried frailty assessment before TAVI between February 2012 and September 2015 at a single academic medical center, and we assessed the impact of preoperative frailty status on morbidity, mortality, and health care utilization after TAVI. Frailty, pre-frailty, and nonfrailty were present in 33% (n = 64), 37% (n = 70), and 30% (n = 57) of patients, respectively. Slowness (75% vs 54%, p = 0.003) and low physical activity (55% vs 31%, p = 0.001) were more common in women than men. With increasing frailty status, the proportion of women increased (35% nonfrail, 44% pre-frail, and 66% frail, p = 0.002) and stature decreased (1.68 ± 0.11 m nonfrail, 1.66 ± 0.11 m pre-frail, 1.62 ± 0.12 m frail, p = 0.028). There was no difference in post-TAVI 30-day mortality, stroke, major vascular injury, major or life-threatening bleeding, respiratory failure, mean hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital re-admission, or overall survival between groups. The rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility increased with increasing frailty status (14% nonfrail, 22% pre-frail, and 39% frail, p = 0.005). Frailty was independently associated with discharge to a rehabilitation facility (odds ratio 4.80, 95% confidence interval 1.66 to 13.85, p = 0.004). In conclusion, the safety of TAVI is not affected by frailty status, but patients with frailty are less likely to be discharged directly home after TAVI.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27156828     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: selectively feasible or extravagantly futile?

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Antonis A Manolis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and frailty.

Authors:  Tetsuro Shimura; Masanori Yamamoto
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-07-29

3.  The Utility of Psoas Muscle Assessment in Predicting Frailty in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Louis Koizia; Mitesh Naik; George Peck; Ghada W Mikhail; Sayan Sen; Iqbal S Malik; Ben Ariff; Michael B Fertleman
Journal:  Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2020-06-28

4.  Frailty Phenotype and Deficit Accumulation Frailty Index in Predicting Recovery After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Sandra Shi; Jonathan Afilalo; Lewis A Lipsitz; Jeffrey J Popma; Kamal R Khabbaz; Roger J Laham; Kim Guibone; Francine Grodstein; Eliah Lux; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Factors associated with length of stay following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement - a multicenter study.

Authors:  Yaron Arbel; Nevena Zivkovic; Dhruven Mehta; Sam Radhakrishnan; Stephen E Fremes; Effat Rezaei; Asim N Cheema; Sami Al-Nasser; Ariel Finkelstein; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Frailty Assessment in a Cohort of Elderly Patients with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis: Insights from the FRailty Evaluation in Severe Aortic Stenosis (FRESAS) Registry.

Authors:  Pablo Solla-Suárez; Pablo Avanzas; Isaac Pascual; Manuel Bermúdez-Menéndez De La Granda; Marcel Almendarez; Jose M Arche-Coto; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Rebeca Lorca; Eva López-Álvarez; Rut Álvarez-Velasco; Carmen Moreno-Planillo; César Morís de la Tassa; José Gutiérrez-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Use of the reported Edmonton frail scale in the assessment of patients for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a possible selection tool in very high-risk patients?

Authors:  Louis Koizia; Sarosh Khan; Angela Frame; Ghada W Mikhail; Sayan Sen; Neil Ruparelia; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Iqbal S Malik; Michael B Fertleman
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Frailty and Exercise Training: How to Provide Best Care after Cardiac Surgery or Intervention for Elder Patients with Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Egle Tamuleviciute-Prasciene; Kristina Drulyte; Greta Jurenaite; Raimondas Kubilius; Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The impact of frailty in aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Elisabet Berastegui Garcia; Maria Luisa Camara Rosell; Enrique Moret Ruiz; Irma Casas Garcia; Sara Badia Gamarra; Claudio Fernandez Gallego; Luis Delgado Ramis; Ignasi Julia Almill; Anna Llorens Ferrer; Bernat Romero Ferrer; Antoni Bayes Genis; Christian Muñoz Guijosa
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Preoperative frailty affects postoperative complications, exercise capacity, and home discharge rates after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Kodai Komaki; Naofumi Yoshida; Seimi Satomi-Kobayashi; Yasunori Tsuboi; Masato Ogawa; Kumiko Wakida; Takayoshi Toba; Hiroyuki Kawamori; Hiromasa Otake; Atsushi Omura; Katsuhiro Yamanaka; Takeshi Inoue; Tomoya Yamashita; Yoshitada Sakai; Kazuhiro P Izawa; Kenji Okada; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.