| Literature DB >> 25711156 |
Dehong Cao1, Liangren Liu1, Yingchun Hu2, Jia Wang1, Jiuhong Yuan1, Qiang Dong1, Qiang Wei3.
Abstract
Herein, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence to compare the safety and efficacy of Shang Ring circumcision (SRC) with conventional circumcision (CC) for male patients. Articles were searched by 2 independent reviewers. Overall, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 3314 patients were included. Compared with the CC group, SRC is associated with shorter operative time, lower intraoperative pain score, higher satisfaction with penile appearances, less intraoperative blood loss, lower adverse event rate, and lower wound bleeding rate. SRC appears to be a safer and more effective choice in comparison with CC for male patients.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2015 PMID： 25711156 DOI： 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urology ISSN： 0090-4295 Impact factor: 2.649