Literature DB >> 27155827

Mental Capacity Assessments Among Inpatients Referred to the Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Unit at a University Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand.

Pornjira Pariwatcharakul1, Supachoke Singhakant2.   

Abstract

Clinicians routinely assess patients' mental capacity on a daily basis, but a more thorough assessment may be needed in complex cases. We aimed to identify the characteristics of inpatients in a general hospital, who were referred to a liaison psychiatry service for mental capacity assessment, reasons for the referrals, and the factors associated with their mental capacity. A 6-year retrospective study (2008-2013) was conducted using data collected routinely (e.g., age, gender, diagnosis, Thai Mental State Examination score, reasons for the referral, and the outcome of capacity assessment) on referrals for mental capacity assessment to a Consultation-liaison Psychiatry Unit at a university hospital in Thailand. Among 6194 consecutive referrals to the liaison-psychiatry services, only 0.6 % [n = 37, mean age (SD), 59.83 (20.42)] were referred for capacity assessment, 43.24 % of which lacked mental capacity. The most common requests from referring physicians were for assessment of testamentary capacity (15 assessed, 53.33 % lacking capacity), financial management capacity (14 assessed, 50 % lacking capacity), and capacity to consent to treatment (9 assessed, 22.22 % lacking capacity). Delirium, rather than dementia or other mental disorders, was associated with mental incapacity (p < 0.001) and being more dependent during the admission (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences for mean age (p = 0.257) or Thai Mental State Examination score (p = 0.206). The main request from referring clinicians was to assess testamentary capacity. Delirium and being more dependent during the admission were associated with lack of mental capacity, whereas age and dementia were not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Competency; Consultation liaison psychiatry; Mental capacity; Psychiatric consultation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27155827     DOI: 10.1007/s11126-016-9439-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  14 in total

1.  Overestimating patients' capacity.

Authors:  Peter Lepping
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  Hospital clinicians' attitudes towards a statutory advocacy service for patients lacking mental capacity: implications for implementation.

Authors:  Lydia Luke; Marcus Redley; Isabel Clare; Anthony Holland
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2008-04

Review 3.  Five years after implementation: a review of the Irish Mental Health Act 2001.

Authors:  Hugh Ramsay; Eric Roche; Brian O'Donoghue
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-28

4.  Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Vanessa Raymont; William Bingley; Alec Buchanan; Anthony S David; Peter Hayward; Simon Wessely; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 16-22       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Mental capacity assessments among general hospital inpatients referred to a specialist liaison psychiatry service for older people.

Authors:  Fedza Mujic; Maite Von Heising; Robert J Stewart; Martin J Prince
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 3.878

Review 6.  Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review.

Authors:  David Okai; Gareth Owen; Hugh McGuire; Swaran Singh; Rachel Churchill; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Changes in capacity to consent over time in patients involved in psychiatric research.

Authors:  Barton W Palmer; Gauri N Savla; Scott C Roesch; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  The utility of the Mini-Mental State Examination in guiding assessment of capacity to consent to research.

Authors:  Paul J P Whelan; Justyna Oleszek; Alastair Macdonald; Fiona Gaughran
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.878

9.  Unreasonable reasons: normative judgements in the assessment of mental capacity.

Authors:  Natalie F Banner
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Decision-making capacity for treatment in psychiatric and medical in-patients: cross-sectional, comparative study.

Authors:  Gareth S Owen; George Szmukler; Genevra Richardson; Anthony S David; Vanessa Raymont; Fabian Freyenhagen; Wayne Martin; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 9.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.