Literature DB >> 27154530

The Frank Stinchfield Award : Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Not a Typical DRG 470: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.

William W Schairer1, Joseph M Lane1, David A Halsey2, Richard Iorio3, Douglas E Padgett1, Alexander S McLawhorn4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a major public health concern. For displaced femoral neck fractures, the needs for medical services during hospitalization and extending beyond hospital discharge after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be different than the needs after THA performed for osteoarthritis (OA), yet these differences are largely uncharacterized, and the Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups system does not distinguish between THA performed for fracture and OA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the differences in in-hospital and 30-day postoperative clinical outcomes for THA performed for femoral neck fracture versus OA? (2) Is a patient's fracture status, that is whether or not a patient has a femoral neck fracture, associated with differences in in-hospital and 30-day postoperative clinical outcomes after THA?
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, which contains outcomes for surgical patients up to 30 days after discharge, was used to identify patients undergoing THA for OA and femoral neck fracture. OA and fracture cohorts were matched one-to-one using propensity scores based on age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and medical comorbidities. Propensity scores represented the conditional probabilities for each patient having a femoral neck fracture based on their individual characteristics, excluding their actual fracture status. Outcomes of interest included operative time, length of stay (LOS), complications, transfusion, discharge destination, and readmission. There were 42,692 patients identified (41,739 OA; 953 femoral neck fractures) with 953 patients in each group for the matched analysis.
RESULTS: For patients with fracture, operative times were slightly longer (98 versus 92 minutes, p = 0.015), they experienced longer LOS (6 versus 4 days, p < 0.001), and the overall frequency of complications was greater compared with patients with OA (16% versus 6%, p < 0.001). Although the frequency of preoperative transfusions was higher in the fracture group (2.0% versus 0.2%, p = 0.002), the frequency of postoperative transfusion was not different between groups (27% versus 24%, p = 0.157). Having a femoral neck fracture versus OA was strongly associated with any postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-3.8]; p < 0.001), unplanned readmission (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.2; p = 0.049), and discharge to an inpatient facility (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.0; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with THA for OA, THA for femoral neck fracture is associated with greater rates of complications, longer LOS, more likely discharge to continued inpatient care, and higher rates of unplanned readmission. This implies higher resource utilization for patients with a fracture. These differences exist despite matching of other preoperative risk factors. As healthcare reimbursement moves toward bundled payment models, it would seem important to differentiate patients and procedures based on the resource utilization they represent to healthcare systems. These results show different expected resource utilization in these two fundamentally different groups of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, suggesting a need to modify healthcare policy to maintain access to THA for all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27154530      PMCID: PMC5213919          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4868-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Mortality rates are similar after hip fractures for rural and urban patients.

Authors:  Benjamin J Miller; Xueya Cai; Peter Cram
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  R P Baker; B Squires; M F Gargan; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery Compared With Elective Total Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Yannick Le Manach; Gary Collins; Mohit Bhandari; Amal Bessissow; Jacques Boddaert; Frédéric Khiami; Harman Chaudhry; Justin De Beer; Bruno Riou; Paul Landais; Mitchell Winemaker; Thierry Boudemaghe; P J Devereaux
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Discharge Destination After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes, Placement Risk Factors, and Recent Trends.

Authors:  Aakash Keswani; Michael C Tasi; Adam Fields; Andrew J Lovy; Calin S Moucha; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Total hip replacement versus open reduction and internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Ghazi Khalil Chammout; Sebastian Simon Mukka; Thomas Carlsson; Gustaf Fredrik Neander; Andre Wilhelm Helge Stark; Olof Gustaf Skoldenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: comparing in-hospital mortality, complications, and disposition to an elective patient population.

Authors:  Adam Sassoon; Michele D'Apuzzo; Stephen Sems; Joseph Cass; Tad Mabry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States.

Authors:  Carmen A Brauer; Marcelo Coca-Perraillon; David M Cutler; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Patient satisfaction, pain, and quality of life 4 months after displaced femoral neck fractures: a comparison of 663 fractures treated with internal fixation and 906 with bipolar hemiarthroplasty reported to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Tarjei Vinje; Stein Atle Lie; Lars B Engesaeter; Leif Ivar Havelin; Ove Furnes; Jonas M Fevang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty are similar for patients with displaced femoral neck fractures and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joseph A Abboud; Rajesh V Patel; Robert E Booth; David G Nazarian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Primary total hip arthroplasty versus internal fixation in displaced fracture of femoral neck in sexa- and septuagenarians.

Authors:  Iftikhar H Wani; Sidhartha Sharma; Irfan Latoo; A Q Salaria; Munir Farooq; Masrat Jan
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: High Risk of Readmission in Octogenarians Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon C Mears
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: Hand Posturing Is a Nonverbal Indicator of Catastrophic Thinking for Finger, Hand, or Wrist Injury.

Authors:  Stephen Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does Undergoing Outpatient Hand Surgery Lead to Prolonged Opioid Use? A Comparison of Surgical and Nonsurgical Patients.

Authors:  William L Wang; Kevin F Lutsky; Richard M McEntee; Lauren Banner; Brian M Katt; Michael N Nakashian; Samir C Sodha; Michael Rivlin; Pedro K Beredjiklian
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-10-19

4.  Does dehydration prior to primary total joint arthroplasty increase risk of perioperative complications?

Authors:  Harold G Moore; Marissa A Justen; David S Kirwin; Patrick J Burroughs; Lee E Rubin; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-10-04

5.  Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Treated With Hip Arthroplasty in Solid Organ Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Cameron K Ledford; Michael J VanWagner; Aaron C Spaulding; Luke S Spencer-Gardner; Benjamin K Wilke; Steven B Porter
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 6.  A Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Comparison in FNF and OA Patients.

Authors:  Jakub Szczesiul; Marek Bielecki
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-09-17

7.  Identification of Risk Factors in the Development of Heterotopic Ossification After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sukhmani Singh; Saam Morshed; Daria Motamedi; Joseph Kidane; Alexandra Paul; Edward C Hsiao; Kelly L Wentworth
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.134

Review 8.  The "Hip Fracture" Bundle-Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; Safdar N Khan; Thuan V Ly; Laura Phieffer; Carmen E Quatman
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-03-05

9.  Operative Times Have Remained Stable for Total Hip Arthroplasty for >15 Years: Systematic Review of 630,675 Procedures.

Authors:  William A Cantrell; Linsen T Samuel; Assem A Sultan; Alexander J Acuña; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-12-10

10.  Incidence, Risk Factors, and Nomogram of Transfusion and Associated Complications in Nonfracture Patients following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuanhe Wang; Cui Wang; Chuan Hu; Bo Chen; Jianyi Li; Yongming Xi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.