Benjamin J Miller1, Xueya Cai, Peter Cram. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. benjamin-j-miller@uiowa.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures are common in the elderly. The best care depends on expeditious presentation, medical stabilization, and treatment of the condition. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We investigated the risk of increased mortality in residents of rural communities secondary to inaccessible facilities and treatment delays. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Part A data to identify 338,092 patients with hip fractures. Each patient was categorized as residing in urban, large rural, or small rural areas. We compared the distance traveled, mortality rates, time from admission to surgery, and length of stay for patients residing in each location. RESULTS: Patients in rural areas traveled substantially farther to reach their treating facility than did urban patients: mean, 34.4 miles for small rural, 14.5 miles for large rural, and 9.3 miles for urban. The adjusted odds ratios for mortality were similar but slightly better for urban patients for in-hospital mortality (small rural odds ratio, 1.05; large rural odds ratio, 1.13). Rural patients had a favorable adjusted odds ratio for 1-year mortality when compared with urban patients (small rural odds ratio, 0.93; large rural odds ratio, 0.96). Rural patients experienced no greater delay in time to surgery or longer hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients living in rural areas traveled a greater distance than those living in urban centers, we found no increase in time to surgery, hospital length of stay, or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures are common in the elderly. The best care depends on expeditious presentation, medical stabilization, and treatment of the condition. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We investigated the risk of increased mortality in residents of rural communities secondary to inaccessible facilities and treatment delays. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Part A data to identify 338,092 patients with hip fractures. Each patient was categorized as residing in urban, large rural, or small rural areas. We compared the distance traveled, mortality rates, time from admission to surgery, and length of stay for patients residing in each location. RESULTS:Patients in rural areas traveled substantially farther to reach their treating facility than did urban patients: mean, 34.4 miles for small rural, 14.5 miles for large rural, and 9.3 miles for urban. The adjusted odds ratios for mortality were similar but slightly better for urban patients for in-hospital mortality (small rural odds ratio, 1.05; large rural odds ratio, 1.13). Rural patients had a favorable adjusted odds ratio for 1-year mortality when compared with urban patients (small rural odds ratio, 0.93; large rural odds ratio, 0.96). Rural patients experienced no greater delay in time to surgery or longer hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients living in rural areas traveled a greater distance than those living in urban centers, we found no increase in time to surgery, hospital length of stay, or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Peter Cram; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Brian Wolf; Jeffrey N Katz; Gary E Rosenthal Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Tiffany A Radcliff; William G Henderson; Tamara J Stoner; Shukri F Khuri; Michael Dohm; Evelyn Hutt Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: William W Schairer; Joseph M Lane; David A Halsey; Richard Iorio; Douglas E Padgett; Alexander S McLawhorn Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Irina A Skripnikova; Margarita A Myagkova; Svetlana A Shalnova; Vladimir A Vygodin; Yuliya A Balanova; Anton R Kiselev; Oxana M Drapkina Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Siri M Solbakken; Jeanette H Magnus; Haakon E Meyer; Cecilie Dahl; Hein Stigum; Anne J Søgaard; Kristin Holvik; Grethe S Tell; Nina Emaus; Siri Forsmo; Clara G Gjesdal; Berit Schei; Peter Vestergaard; Tone K Omsland Journal: JBMR Plus Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Tom Salih; Peter Martin; Tom Poulton; Charles M Oliver; Mike G Bassett; S Ramani Moonesinghe Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Mari Hoff; Inger M Skoie; Marc Hochberg; Glenn Haugeberg Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Khalid A Alsheikh; Firas M Alsebayel; Faisal Abdulmohsen Alsudairy; Abdullah Alzahrani; Ali Alshehri; Faisal Ahmed Alhusain; Abdullah Alsaeed; Abdulaziz Almubarak; Ali A Alhandi Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 1.526