Literature DB >> 27154459

Experimental analyses of the cavitation generated by ultrasonically activated surgical devices.

Tao Gao1, Bik Ee Lau2, Tadashi Yamaguchi3, Naoyuki Hanari1, Hisashi Gunji1, Masayuki Kano1, Hisahiro Matsubara1, Hideki Hayashi4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage has been reported to have significantly increased after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancers in comparison to open surgery. Although their lateral thermal spread has been shown to be smaller than that of other electrosurgical devices, ultrasonically activated surgical devices (USADs) have been suggested as one of the causes. We therefore hypothesized that cavitation generated by USADs could cause injuries to pancreatic tissue. Our retrospective study showed that the amylase activity in the drainage fluid of patients in whom surgery was performed using a USAD with a curved blade was significantly higher than that in patients in whom surgery was performed using a USAD with a straight blade. We therefore focused on the effects of straight and curved USAD blades.
METHODS: The distribution of microbubbles generated in degassed water, which produce mechanical and biological tissue destructive forces, was measured and compared between the two types of USAD.
RESULTS: More microbubbles were found to be generated from the side aspect of the curved blade, and the mechanical and biological destructive forces were found to be significantly higher than those generated by the side aspect of the straight blade.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings strongly suggest that cavitation generated by USADs could injure pancreatic tissues in the clinical cases. Surgeons should be aware of these properties of devices to achieve safe and secure surgeries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy device; Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Pancreatic injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27154459     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1345-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  22 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Yi-Ke Zeng; Zu-Li Yang; Jun-Sheng Peng; Han-Sheng Lin; Ling Cai
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Do Joong Park; Sang-Uk Han; Woo Jin Hyung; Min Chan Kim; Wook Kim; Seong Yeob Ryu; Seung-Wan Ryu; Kyo Young Song; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Gyu-Seok Cho; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Heat production, nerve function, and morphology following nerve close dissection with surgical instruments.

Authors:  Johan Carlander; C Koch; L Brudin; C Nordborg; O Gimm; K Johansson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Hirohiko Sato; Mitsuo Shimada; Nobuhiro Kurita; Takashi Iwata; Masanori Nishioka; Shinya Morimoto; Kozo Yoshikawa; Tomohiko Miyatani; Masakazu Goto; Hideya Kashihara; Chie Takasu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications.

Authors:  Kazutaka Obama; Hiroshi Okabe; Hisahiro Hosogi; Eiji Tanaka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Evaluation of an innovative, cordless ultrasonic dissector.

Authors:  Victor B Tsirline; Kelvin N Lau; Ryan Z Swan; Paul N Montero; David Sindram; John B Martinie; David A Iannitti
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Ochiai; H Shimada; Y Gunji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

Authors:  Eduardo F Viñuela; Mithat Gonen; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Joo-Ho Lee; Cha-Kyong Yom; Ho-Seong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modification of the Thermal Spread by the Blade Shape of an Ultrasonically Activated Device.

Authors:  Shuhei Kajiwara; Hirokazu Noshiro; Hiroshi Kitagawa; Tomokazu Tanaka; Keita Kai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic clamp-crushing enucleation with a pancreatic duct stent for tumors located close to the main pancreatic duct.

Authors:  Katsunori Sakamoto; Kohei Ogawa; Akihiro Takai; Kei Tamura; Miku Iwata; Chihiro Ito; Akimasa Sakamoto; Takashi Matsui; Yusuke Nishi; Mio Uraoka; Tomoyuki Nagaoka; Naotake Funamizu; Yasutsugu Takada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.549

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.