Literature DB >> 27154416

Characterization of patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) as models for estrogen receptor positive (ER+HER2- and ER+HER2+) breast cancers.

Noriko Kanaya1, George Somlo2, Jun Wu3, Paul Frankel4, Masaya Kai1, Xueli Liu4, Shang Victoria Wu1, Duc Nguyen1, Nymph Chan1, Meng-Yin Hsieh3, Michele Kirschenbaum5, Laura Kruper6, Courtney Vito6, Behnam Badie6, John H Yim6, Yuan Yuan2, Arti Hurria2, Chu Peiguo7, Joanne Mortimer2, Shiuan Chen8.   

Abstract

The research was to appraise the utility of the patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) as models of estrogen receptor positive (ER+HER2- and ER+HER2+) breast cancers. We compared protein expression profiles by Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) in tumors that resulted in PDXs compared to those that did not. Our overall PDX intake rate for ER+ breast cancer was 9% (9/97). The intake rate for ER+HER2+ tumors (3/16, 19%) was higher than for ER+HER2- tumors (6/81, 7%). Heat map analyses of RPPA data showed that ER+HER2- tumors were divided into 2 groups by luminal A/B signature [protein expression of ER, AR, Bcl-2, Bim (BCL2L11), GATA3 and INPP4b], and this expression signature was also associated with the rate of PDX intake. Cell survival pathways such as the PI3K/AKT signaling and RAS/ERK pathways were more activated in the specimens that could be established as PDX in both classes. Expression of the ER protein itself may have a bearing on the potential success of an ER+ PDX model. In addition, HER2 and its downstream protein expressions were up-regulated in the ER+HER2+ patient tumors that were successfully established as PDX models. Moreover, the comparison of RPPA data between original and PDX tumors suggested that the selection/adaptation process required to grow the tumors in mice is unavoidable for generation of ER+ PDX models, and we identified differences between patient tumor samples and paired PDX tumors. A better understanding of the biological characteristics of ER+PDX would be the key to using PDX models in assessing treatment strategies in a preclinical setting.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; ER+HER2+; ER+HER2−; Luminal A/B; Patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27154416      PMCID: PMC5094906          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  42 in total

1.  Absent, small or homeotic 2-like protein (ASH2L) enhances the transcription of the estrogen receptor α gene through GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3).

Authors:  Jin Qi; Lei Huo; Yiwei Tony Zhu; Yi-Jun Zhu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Prognostic and functional importance of the engraftment-associated genes in the patient-derived xenograft models of triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Hyeong-Gon Moon; Keunhee Oh; Jiwoo Lee; Minju Lee; Ju-Yeon Kim; Tae-Kyung Yoo; Myung Won Seo; Ae Kyung Park; Han Suk Ryu; Eun-Jung Jung; Namshin Kim; Seongmun Jeong; Wonshik Han; Dong-Sup Lee; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for breast cancer drug development.

Authors:  Elisabetta Marangoni; Marie-France Poupon
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Dynamics of genomic clones in breast cancer patient xenografts at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Peter Eirew; Adi Steif; Jaswinder Khattra; Gavin Ha; Damian Yap; Hossein Farahani; Karen Gelmon; Stephen Chia; Colin Mar; Adrian Wan; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Karey Shumansky; Jamie Rosner; Andrew McPherson; Cydney Nielsen; Andrew J L Roth; Calvin Lefebvre; Ali Bashashati; Camila de Souza; Celia Siu; Radhouane Aniba; Jazmine Brimhall; Arusha Oloumi; Tomo Osako; Alejandra Bruna; Jose L Sandoval; Teresa Algara; Wendy Greenwood; Kaston Leung; Hongwei Cheng; Hui Xue; Yuzhuo Wang; Dong Lin; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Yongjun Zhao; Julie Lorette; Long Nguyen; David Huntsman; Connie J Eaves; Carl Hansen; Marco A Marra; Carlos Caldas; Sohrab P Shah; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A renewable tissue resource of phenotypically stable, biologically and ethnically diverse, patient-derived human breast cancer xenograft models.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhang; Sofie Claerhout; Aleix Prat; Lacey E Dobrolecki; Ivana Petrovic; Qing Lai; Melissa D Landis; Lisa Wiechmann; Rachel Schiff; Mario Giuliano; Helen Wong; Suzanne W Fuqua; Alejandro Contreras; Carolina Gutierrez; Jian Huang; Sufeng Mao; Anne C Pavlick; Amber M Froehlich; Meng-Fen Wu; Anna Tsimelzon; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Edward S Chen; Pavel Zuloaga; Chad A Shaw; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Charles M Perou; Gordon B Mills; Jenny C Chang; Michael T Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  A new model of patient tumor-derived breast cancer xenografts for preclinical assays.

Authors:  Elisabetta Marangoni; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Nathalie Auger; Armelle Degeorges; Franck Assayag; Patricia de Cremoux; Ludmilla de Plater; Charlotte Guyader; Gonzague De Pinieux; Jean-Gabriel Judde; Magali Rebucci; Carine Tran-Perennou; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Olivier Delattre; Véronique Diéras; Marie-France Poupon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Ability to Generate Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Xenografts Is Enhanced in Chemoresistant Disease and Predicts Poor Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Priscilla F McAuliffe; Kurt W Evans; Argun Akcakanat; Ken Chen; Xiaofeng Zheng; Hao Zhao; Agda Karina Eterovic; Takafumi Sangai; Ashley M Holder; Chandeshwar Sharma; Huiqin Chen; Kim-Anh Do; Emily Tarco; Mihai Gagea; Katherine A Naff; Aysegul Sahin; Asha S Multani; Dalliah M Black; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Isabelle Bedrosian; Gordon B Mills; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Breast tumor PDXs are genetically plastic and correspond to a subset of aggressive cancers prone to relapse.

Authors:  Stanislas du Manoir; Béatrice Orsetti; Rui Bras-Gonçalves; Tien-Tuan Nguyen; Laurence Lasorsa; Florence Boissière; Blandine Massemin; Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo; Frédéric Bibeau; William Jacot; Charles Theillet
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Histological evaluation of AMPK signalling in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Sirwan M Hadad; Lee Baker; Philip R Quinlan; Katherine E Robertson; Susan E Bray; George Thomson; David Kellock; Lee B Jordan; Colin A Purdie; David G Hardie; Stewart Fleming; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Patient-derived breast tumor xenografts facilitating personalized cancer therapy.

Authors:  Melissa D Landis; Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Jenny C Chang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  14 in total

1.  Molecular Mechanisms of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (BDE-47, BDE-100, and BDE-153) in Human Breast Cancer Cells and Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Noriko Kanaya; Lauren Bernal; Gregory Chang; Takuro Yamamoto; Duc Nguyen; Yuan-Zhong Wang; June-Soo Park; Charles Warden; Jinhui Wang; Xiwei Wu; Timothy Synold; Michele Rakoff; Susan L Neuhausen; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  SRC Increases MYC mRNA Expression in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer via mRNA Stabilization and Inhibition of p53 Function.

Authors:  Christopher Abdullah; Hasan Korkaya; Shinji Iizuka; Sara A Courtneidge
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  TXNIP Links Anticipatory Unfolded Protein Response to Estrogen Reprogramming Glucose Metabolism in Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Yuanzhong Wang; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.051

4.  Functional characterization of androgen receptor in two patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Wang; Karineh Petrossian; Miao-Juei Huang; Kohei Saeki; Noriko Kanaya; Gregory Chang; George Somlo; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Use of dual mTOR inhibitor MLN0128 against everolimus-resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  Karineh Petrossian; Duc Nguyen; Chiao Lo; Noriko Kanaya; George Somlo; Yvonne Xiaoyong Cui; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 6.  Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Breast Cancer and Their Application.

Authors:  Takahiko Murayama; Noriko Gotoh
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  The prognostic value of quantitative analysis of CCL5 and collagen IV in luminal B (HER2-) subtype breast cancer by quantum-dot-based molecular imaging.

Authors:  Yong-Yun Zhu; Chuang Chen; Juan-Juan Li; Sheng-Rong Sun
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-06-28

8.  Tumor shedding and metastatic progression after tumor excision in patient-derived orthotopic xenograft models of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Aryana M Razmara; Elodie Sollier; Grace N Kisirkoi; Sam W Baker; Margot B Bellon; Alex McMillan; Clementine A Lemaire; Vishnu C Ramani; Stefanie S Jeffrey; Kerriann M Casey
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Synergistic anti-cancer activity of CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and dual mTOR kinase inhibitor MLN0128 in pRb-expressing ER-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Takuro Yamamoto; Noriko Kanaya; George Somlo; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 10.  Targeted therapies in breast cancer: New challenges to fight against resistance.

Authors:  Viviana Masoud; Gilles Pagès
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.