PURPOSE: To investigate magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), T1 relaxation time, and proton density (PD) as indicators of gray matter damage in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), reflecting different aspects of microstructural damage and as imaging correlates of clinical disability. We aimed to determine which of these parameters may optimally quantify cortical damage, and serve as an imaging surrogate of clinical disability. In this study, cortical values of MTR, a surrogate for demyelination in MS, of PD, reflecting replacement of neural tissue by water, and of T1 , indicating a complex array of microstructural changes, were assessed in a group of RRMS patients in comparison to healthy controls (HC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 RRMS patients with varying disease duration (4.0 ± 6.54 years) and 10 HC received quantitative 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MTR, T1 , and PD mapping. We tested for differences in cortical measurements between patients and HC. Additionally, correlation with disability as quantified by the Expanded Disability Status Scale was investigated. RESULTS: Cortical parameter values were significantly altered in the RRMS group, with increased values of T1 (P = 0.008) and PD (P = 0.028) and reduced values of MTR (P = 0.043). Only cortical T1 was correlated with clinical disability measurements (P = 0.001, r = 0.65). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the best discriminatory power for T1 (area under the curve 0.79, PD: 0.75, MTR 0.73). CONCLUSION: Out of the parameters studied, cortical T1 is best suited to detect cortical damage as an imaging surrogate of clinical disability in RRMS. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1600-1607.
PURPOSE: To investigate magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), T1 relaxation time, and proton density (PD) as indicators of gray matter damage in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), reflecting different aspects of microstructural damage and as imaging correlates of clinical disability. We aimed to determine which of these parameters may optimally quantify cortical damage, and serve as an imaging surrogate of clinical disability. In this study, cortical values of MTR, a surrogate for demyelination in MS, of PD, reflecting replacement of neural tissue by water, and of T1 , indicating a complex array of microstructural changes, were assessed in a group of RRMS patients in comparison to healthy controls (HC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 RRMS patients with varying disease duration (4.0 ± 6.54 years) and 10 HC received quantitative 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MTR, T1 , and PD mapping. We tested for differences in cortical measurements between patients and HC. Additionally, correlation with disability as quantified by the Expanded Disability Status Scale was investigated. RESULTS: Cortical parameter values were significantly altered in the RRMS group, with increased values of T1 (P = 0.008) and PD (P = 0.028) and reduced values of MTR (P = 0.043). Only cortical T1 was correlated with clinical disability measurements (P = 0.001, r = 0.65). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the best discriminatory power for T1 (area under the curve 0.79, PD: 0.75, MTR 0.73). CONCLUSION: Out of the parameters studied, cortical T1 is best suited to detect cortical damage as an imaging surrogate of clinical disability in RRMS. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1600-1607.
Authors: Alice Pirastru; Yongsheng Chen; Laura Pelizzari; Francesca Baglio; Mario Clerici; E Mark Haacke; Maria Marcella Laganà Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: René-Maxime Gracien; Lucas Nürnberger; Pavel Hok; Stephanie-Michelle Hof; Sarah C Reitz; Udo Rüb; Helmuth Steinmetz; Rüdiger Hilker-Roggendorf; Johannes C Klein; Ralf Deichmann; Simon Baudrexel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alexandra van Wijnen; Franca Petrov; Michelle Maiworm; Stefan Frisch; Christian Foerch; Elke Hattingen; Helmuth Steinmetz; Johannes C Klein; Ralf Deichmann; Marlies Wagner; René-Maxime Gracien Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sara Lorio; Tim M Tierney; Amy McDowell; Owen J Arthurs; Antoine Lutti; Nikolaus Weiskopf; David W Carmichael Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: René-Maxime Gracien; Alina Jurcoane; Marlies Wagner; Sarah C Reitz; Christoph Mayer; Steffen Volz; Stephanie-Michelle Hof; Vinzenz Fleischer; Amgad Droby; Helmuth Steinmetz; Frauke Zipp; Elke Hattingen; Ralf Deichmann; Johannes C Klein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.240