Literature DB >> 27153160

Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurosurgical procedures.

Corinna C Zygourakis1,2, Seungwon Yoon3, Victoria Valencia2,4, Christy Boscardin2,5, Christopher Moriates2,4, Ralph Gonzales2,5,6, Michael T Lawton1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Disposable supplies constitute a large portion of operating room (OR) costs and are often left over at the end of a surgical case. Despite financial and environmental implications of such waste, there has been little evaluation of OR supply utilization. The goal of this study was to quantify the utilization of disposable supplies and the costs associated with opened but unused items (i.e., "waste") in neurosurgical procedures. METHODS Every disposable supply that was unused at the end of surgery was quantified through direct observation of 58 neurosurgical cases at the University of California, San Francisco, in August 2015. Item costs (in US dollars) were determined from the authors' supply catalog, and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Across 58 procedures (36 cranial, 22 spinal), the average cost of unused supplies was $653 (range $89-$3640, median $448, interquartile range $230-$810), or 13.1% of total surgical supply cost. Univariate analyses revealed that case type (cranial versus spinal), case category (vascular, tumor, functional, instrumented, and noninstrumented spine), and surgeon were important predictors of the percentage of unused surgical supply cost. Case length and years of surgical training did not affect the percentage of unused supply cost. Accounting for the different case distribution in the 58 selected cases, the authors estimate approximately $968 of OR waste per case, $242,968 per month, and $2.9 million per year, for their neurosurgical department. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a large variation and significant magnitude of OR waste in neurosurgical procedures. At the authors' institution, they recommend price transparency, education about OR waste to surgeons and nurses, preference card reviews, and clarification of supplies that should be opened versus available as needed to reduce waste.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IQR = interquartile range; OR = operating room; UCSF = University of California, San Francisco; disposable surgical supplies; operating room; supply utilization; surgical cost

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27153160     DOI: 10.3171/2016.2.JNS152442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  10 in total

1.  Cost of open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: surgeon perceptions versus the reality of hospital spending.

Authors:  Liza Abraham; Nik Goyert; Daniel J Kagedan; Andrea MacNeill; Michelle C Cleghorn; Julie Hallet; Fayez A Quereshy; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Identification and Cost of Disposable Endourological Devices for Nephrolithiasis: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Urological Trainees.

Authors:  Eoin MacCraith; Niall F Davis; Cliodhna Browne; David J Galvin; David M Quinlan; Gerald M Lennon; David W Mulvin
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Cassandra L Thiel; Noe C Woods; Melissa M Bilec
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The Environmental Footprint of Neurosurgery Operations: An Assessment of Waste Streams and the Carbon Footprint.

Authors:  Sayed Samed Talibi; Teresa Scott; Rahim A Hussain
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  The Triple Bottom Line and Stabilization Wedges: A Framework for Perioperative Sustainability.

Authors:  Bong Joon James Choi; Catherine L Chen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Operating Room Supply Cost Awareness: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Bogdana Schmidt; Maxwell V Meng; Lindsay A Hampson
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2018-04-27

7.  The design and evaluation of a novel algorithm for automated preference card optimization.

Authors:  David Scheinker; Matt Hollingsworth; Anna Brody; Carey Phelps; William Bryant; Francesca Pei; Kristin Petersen; Alekhya Reddy; James Wall
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Improving productivity, costs and environmental impact in International Eye Health Services: using the 'Eyefficiency' cataract surgical services auditing tool to assess the value of cataract surgical services.

Authors:  Hena Goel; Thomas Alan Wemyss; Tanya Harris; Ingeborg Steinbach; Rachel Stancliffe; Andrew Cassels-Brown; Peter Benjamin Michael Thomas; Cassandra L Thiel
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Evaluating the Waste Prevention Potential of a Multi- versus Single-Use Surgical Stapler.

Authors:  Markus Meissner; Sabrina Lichtnegger; Scott Gibson; Rhodri Saunders
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-09-18

10.  Application of Virtual Reality Based on 3D-CTA in Intracranial Aneurysm Surgery.

Authors:  Zhilei Li; Guojin Huo; Yi Feng; Zhulin Ma
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.682

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.