Literature DB >> 29698098

Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Laparoscopic Surgery.

Cassandra L Thiel1, Noe C Woods1, Melissa M Bilec1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the carbon footprint of various sustainability interventions used for laparoscopic hysterectomy.
METHODS: We designed interventions for laparoscopic hysterectomy from approaches that sustainable health care organizations advocate. We used a hybrid environmental life cycle assessment framework to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed interventions. We conducted the study from September 2015 to December 2016 at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania).
RESULTS: The largest carbon footprint savings came from selecting specific anesthetic gases and minimizing the materials used in surgery. Energy-related interventions resulted in a 10% reduction in carbon footprint per case but would result in larger savings for the whole facility. Commonly implemented approaches, such as recycling surgical waste, resulted in less than a 5% reduction in greenhouse gases.
CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the environmental emissions of surgeries, health care providers need to implement a combination of approaches, including minimizing materials, moving away from certain heat-trapping anesthetic gases, maximizing instrument reuse or single-use device reprocessing, and reducing off-hour energy use in the operating room. These strategies can reduce the carbon footprint of an average laparoscopic hysterectomy by up to 80%. Recycling alone does very little to reduce environmental footprint. Public Health Implications. Health care services are a major source of environmental emissions and reducing their carbon footprint would improve environmental and human health. Facilities seeking to reduce environmental footprint should take a comprehensive systems approach to find safe and effective interventions and should identify and address policy barriers to implementing more sustainable practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29698098      PMCID: PMC5922216          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  20 in total

1.  Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector.

Authors:  Jeanette W Chung; David O Meltzer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Tackling climate change: the greatest opportunity for global health.

Authors:  Helena Wang; Richard Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  From public to planetary health: a manifesto.

Authors:  Richard Horton; Robert Beaglehole; Ruth Bonita; John Raeburn; Martin McKee; Stig Wall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Steam sterilisation's energy and water footprint.

Authors:  Forbes McGain; Graham Moore; Jim Black
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Inhalation anaesthetics and climate change.

Authors:  M P Sulbaek Andersen; S P Sander; O J Nielsen; D S Wagner; T J Sanford; T J Wallington
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Brian Morrow; Michelle N Podgornik; Kate M Brett; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The carbon footprint of cataract surgery.

Authors:  D S Morris; T Wright; J E A Somner; A Connor
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Environmental impact of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: an estimate of the carbon dioxide footprint.

Authors:  Nicholas E Power; Jonathan L Silberstein; Tarek P Ghoneim; Bertrand Guillonneau; Karim A Touijer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra L Thiel; Matthew Eckelman; Richard Guido; Matthew Huddleston; Amy E Landis; Jodi Sherman; Scott O Shrake; Noe Copley-Woods; Melissa M Bilec
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Environmental Impacts of the U.S. Health Care System and Effects on Public Health.

Authors:  Matthew J Eckelman; Jodi Sherman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Triple Bottom Line and Stabilization Wedges: A Framework for Perioperative Sustainability.

Authors:  Bong Joon James Choi; Catherine L Chen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Environmental impact and life cycle financial cost of hybrid (reusable/single-use) instruments versus single-use equivalents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Chantelle Rizan; Mahmood F Bhutta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  Building sustainable and resilient surgical systems: A narrative review of opportunities to integrate climate change into national surgical planning in the Western Pacific region.

Authors:  Rennie X Qin; Lotta Velin; Elizabeth F Yates; Omnia El Omrani; Elizabeth McLeod; Jemesa Tudravu; Lubna Samad; Alistair Woodward; Craig D McClain
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 4.  Health, financial and environmental impacts of unnecessary vitamin D testing: a triple bottom line assessment adapted for healthcare.

Authors:  Matilde Breth-Petersen; Katy Bell; Kristen Pickles; Forbes McGain; Scott McAlister; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The environmental impact of personal protective equipment in a pre and post COVID era in the ENT clinic.

Authors:  Eric Farrell; David Smyth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care.

Authors:  Jonathan Drew; Sean D Christie; Peter Tyedmers; Jenna Smith-Forrester; Daniel Rainham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.