Inez Myin-Germeys1, Annelie Klippel, Henrietta Steinhart, Ulrich Reininghaus. 1. aKU Leuven, Department of Neuroscience, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Leuven, Belgium bMaastricht University Medical Centre, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss feasibility, content, and where possible efficacy of ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) in psychiatry. EMIs adopt mobile devices, such as personal digital assistants or smartphones, for the delivery of treatments in the daily life of patients. We will discuss EMIs in the field of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression disorder, as well as one generic, transdiagnostic EMI. RECENT FINDINGS: The few studies that are available all underscore feasibility and acceptability of mobile health approaches in patients with severe mental illness. In terms of content, there is a huge variety in approaches ranging from a mixture of face-to-face contacts augmented with EMI components to a fully automated EMI. With regard to efficacy, only two randomized clinical trials have been conducted, supporting the efficacy of EMIs in mental health. Evidence seems to point toward greater efficacy when EMI is integrated with real-life assessment using experience sampling methodology, preferentially tailoring the intervention toward the specific needs of the individual as well as toward those moments when intervention is needed. SUMMARY: The review demonstrates that mobile health may be an important asset to the mental health field but underscores that it still is in its very early ages. In the discussion, we point toward ways of improving EMIs for severe mental illness, changing our perspective from testing feasibility to testing efficacy and ultimately implementing EMIs in routine mental health services.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss feasibility, content, and where possible efficacy of ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) in psychiatry. EMIs adopt mobile devices, such as personal digital assistants or smartphones, for the delivery of treatments in the daily life of patients. We will discuss EMIs in the field of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression disorder, as well as one generic, transdiagnostic EMI. RECENT FINDINGS: The few studies that are available all underscore feasibility and acceptability of mobile health approaches in patients with severe mental illness. In terms of content, there is a huge variety in approaches ranging from a mixture of face-to-face contacts augmented with EMI components to a fully automated EMI. With regard to efficacy, only two randomized clinical trials have been conducted, supporting the efficacy of EMIs in mental health. Evidence seems to point toward greater efficacy when EMI is integrated with real-life assessment using experience sampling methodology, preferentially tailoring the intervention toward the specific needs of the individual as well as toward those moments when intervention is needed. SUMMARY: The review demonstrates that mobile health may be an important asset to the mental health field but underscores that it still is in its very early ages. In the discussion, we point toward ways of improving EMIs for severe mental illness, changing our perspective from testing feasibility to testing efficacy and ultimately implementing EMIs in routine mental health services.
Authors: Brent A Moore; Frank D Buono; Daniel P Lloyd; Destiny M B Printz; David A Fiellin; Declan T Barry Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2018-11-24
Authors: Patricia Gual-Montolio; Irene Jaén; Verónica Martínez-Borba; Diana Castilla; Carlos Suso-Ribera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Marie-Camille Patoz; Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei; Bruno Pereira; Olivier Blanc; Ingrid de Chazeron; Andrea Murru; Norma Verdolini; Isabella Pacchiarotti; Eduard Vieta; Pierre-Michel Llorca; Ludovic Samalin Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-06-03
Authors: Jojanneke A Bastiaansen; Yoram K Kunkels; Frank J Blaauw; Steven M Boker; Eva Ceulemans; Meng Chen; Sy-Miin Chow; Peter de Jonge; Ando C Emerencia; Sacha Epskamp; Aaron J Fisher; Ellen L Hamaker; Peter Kuppens; Wolfgang Lutz; M Joseph Meyer; Robert Moulder; Zita Oravecz; Harriëtte Riese; Julian Rubel; Oisín Ryan; Michelle N Servaas; Gustav Sjobeck; Evelien Snippe; Timothy J Trull; Wolfgang Tschacher; Date C van der Veen; Marieke Wichers; Phillip K Wood; William C Woods; Aidan G C Wright; Casper J Albers; Laura F Bringmann Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Katherine M Gerull; Dorina Kallogjeri; Marilyn L Piccirillo; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Eric J Lenze; Jay F Piccirillo Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 5.591
Authors: Christian Rauschenberg; Julia C C Schulte-Strathaus; Jim van Os; Matthieu Goedhart; Jan N M Schieveld; Ulrich Reininghaus Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: I Paetzold; I Myin-Germeys; A Schick; B Nelson; E Velthorst; F Schirmbeck; J van Os; C Morgan; J Hartmann; M van der Gaag; L de Haan; L Valmaggia; P McGuire; M Kempton; U Reininghaus Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 6.892