| Literature DB >> 27152219 |
Nick Bos1, Unni Pulliainen1, Liselotte Sundström1, Dalial Freitak2.
Abstract
Starvation is one of the most common and severe stressors in nature. Not only does it lead to death if not alleviated, it also forces the starved individual to allocate resources only to the most essential processes. This creates energetic trade-offs which can lead to many secondary challenges for the individual. These energetic trade-offs could be exacerbated in inbred individuals, which have been suggested to have a less efficient metabolism. Here, we studied the effect of inbreeding on starvation resistance in a natural population of Formica exsecta ants, with a focus on survival and tissue-specific expression of stress, metabolism and immunity-related genes. Starvation led to large tissue-specific changes in gene expression, but inbreeding had little effect on most of the genes studied. Our results illustrate the importance of studying stress responses in different tissues instead of entire organisms.Entities:
Keywords: gene expression; inbreeding; social insect; starvation; tissue specificity
Year: 2016 PMID: 27152219 PMCID: PMC4852642 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.The effect of inbreeding on starvation-induced mortality. Starved ants died significantly faster than control ants, but no effect of inbreeding level was found.
Figure 2.Effects of starvation-induced on tissue-specific gene expression. Expression of 10 different genes involved in immunity and/or metabolism. After correction for multiple comparisons, the effect of starvation was significant in Def, Hyme, PPO, HSP75 and VATP. The interaction between tissue and treatment was significant in Def. Statistical significances of each factor and interaction can be found in table 1. Data shown as mean ± 95% CI.
FDR-corrected results of gene expression data. An overview of the gene expression results for (a) immunity-related genes and (b) stress- and metabolism-related genes. Significant p-values are bolded. Note that all p-values shown are obtained after FDR-correction. Also note that p-values regarding tissue cannot be properly interpreted due to the expression of the housekeeping gene differing significantly between tissues.
| ( | Aryl | Def | Hyme | LysC | PPO | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d.f. | d.f. | d.f. | d.f. | d.f. | |||||||||||
| tissue | 1,65 | 97.90 | 1,62 | 256.18 | 1,64 | 48.63 | 1,63 | 1.65 | 0.42 | 1,64 | 159.34 | ||||
| treatment | 1,64 | 0.90 | 0.52 | 1,62 | 104.75 | 1,64 | 29.42 | 1,63 | 0.31 | 0.71 | 1,64 | 15.69 | |||
| HL | 1,12 | 4.66 | 0.17 | 1,12 | 2.68 | 0.30 | 1,12 | 0.32 | 0.71 | 1,12 | 0.28 | 0.72 | 1,12 | 0.74 | 0.54 |
| tissue : treatment | 1,63 | 1.54 | 0.43 | 1,62 | 16.48 | 1,62 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 1,63 | 5.34 | 0.09 | 1,62 | 0.78 | 0.54 | |
| tissue : HL | 1,62 | 1.35 | 0.45 | 1,62 | 8.54 | 1,63 | 2.95 | 0.24 | 1,62 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 1,61 | 0.70 | 0.55 | |
| treatment : HL | 1,61 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1,61 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 1,61 | 0.15 | 0.82 | 1,61 | 0.13 | 0.83 | 1,63 | 3.88 | 0.17 |
| tissue : treatment : HL | 1,60 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 1,60 | 0.09 | 0.83 | 1,60 | 0.10 | 0.86 | 1,60 | 0.31 | 0.72 | 1,60 | 1.53 | 0.42 |
Figure 3.Effects of inbreeding on tissue-specific gene expression. Inbreeding had a significant interaction with tissue in Def. In HSP75, there was a significant three-way interaction between tissue, treatment and inbreeding.