Literature DB >> 27150499

Addressing phonological memory in language therapy with clients who have Down syndrome: Perspectives of speech-language pathologists.

Gayle G Faught1, Frances A Conners2, Angela B Barber3, Hannah R Price2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phonological memory (PM) plays a significant role in language development but is impaired in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Without formal recommendations on how to address PM limitations in clients with DS, it is possible speech-language pathologists (SLPs) find ways to do so in their practices. AIMS: This study asked if and how SLPs address PM in language therapy with clients who have DS. It also asked about SLPs' opinions of the importance, practicality and difficulty of addressing PM in clients with DS. METHODS & PROCEDURES: SLPs participated in an online survey that asked if they address PM in clients with DS and, if so, how often and with which techniques. The survey also asked SLPs to rate their opinions of addressing PM in clients with DS with Likert scales. To contrast clients with DS, SLPs were asked about their practices and opinions with clients who have specific language impairment (SLI) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). SLPs were recruited through e-mails sent from state organizations and researchers. To compare SLPs' practices and opinions across client types, frequency analyses and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were run. OUTCOMES &
RESULTS: In all, 290 SLPs from 28 states completed the survey. Nearly all SLPs were currently practising at the time data were collected, and all worked with at least one of the three client types. Findings indicated SLPs less often addressed PM and used less variety when addressing PM with clients who have DS compared with clients who have SLI or ASD. Further, SLPs considered it less important, less practical and more difficult to address PM in clients who have DS when compared with clients who have SLI, whereas a similar pattern was found with clients who have ASD. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: SLPs' opinions could be one reason they under-address PM with clients who have DS. Other reasons include there are no evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines on this topic, and there is not enough familiarity with the DS phenotype among SLPs. Future research on ways to address PM in clients with DS successfully are essential so that EBP guidelines can be established and language therapy can be made more effective.
© 2016 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; autism spectrum disorders (ASD); phonological memory; specific language impairment (SLI); speech and language pathologists; speech and language therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27150499      PMCID: PMC5858696          DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  33 in total

1.  Verbal short-term memory deficits in Down syndrome: a consequence of problems in rehearsal?

Authors:  C Jarrold; A D Baddeley; A K Hewes
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 8.982

2.  The relationships among verbal short-term memory, phonological awareness, and new word learning: evidence from typical development and Down syndrome.

Authors:  Christopher Jarrold; Annabel S C Thorn; Emma Stephens
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-08-15

3.  Longitudinal profiles of expressive vocabulary, syntax and pragmatic language in boys with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome.

Authors:  Gary E Martin; Molly Losh; Bruno Estigarribia; John Sideris; Joanne Roberts
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The use of nonword repetition as a test of phonological memory in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  G Laws
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 8.982

5.  Cognitive, environmental, and linguistic predictors of syntax in fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.

Authors:  Bruno Estigarribia; Gary E Martin; Joanne E Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching with preschool children who have intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Ann P Kaiser; Megan Y Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI).

Authors:  G Conti-Ramsden; N Botting; B Faragher
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  Early predictors of language in children with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  Paul J Yoder; Steven F Warren
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2004-07

9.  Hearing level in children with Down syndrome at the age of eight.

Authors:  Marit Erna Austeng; Harriet Akre; Eva-Signe Falkenberg; Britt Øverland; Michael Abdelnoor; Kari Jorunn Kværner
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-05-02

10.  Efficacy of a reading and language intervention for children with Down syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kelly Burgoyne; Fiona J Duff; Paula J Clarke; Sue Buckley; Margaret J Snowling; Charles Hulme
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 8.982

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Distributional Cues to Language Learning in Children With Intellectual Disabilities.

Authors:  Sara T Kover
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.983

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.