Literature DB >> 27150462

Gambling Responsibly: Who Does It and To What End?

Nerilee Hing1, Kerry Sproston2, Katherine Tran3, Alex M T Russell4.   

Abstract

Numerous responsible gambling (RG) strategies are promoted to assist consumers to "gamble responsibly". However, consumer adoption of RG strategies, how this varies by gambler risk group, and whether usage is associated with non-problematic gambling are largely unknown. This study aimed to (1) determine how use of RG-related strategies differs amongst regular gamblers by gambler risk group; and (2) identify RG-related strategies whose usage predicts non-problem/low risk gambling. Regular Australian gamblers on high-risk products (N = 860), recruited through gambling venues and an online wagering operator, were surveyed about their use of RG strategies promoted on the website of their jurisdiction's main RG agency. Knowledge of RG strategies was reasonably high amongst all gambler risk groups, but lower-risk groups were more likely to use RG strategies. A logistic regression correctly predicted 82.1 % of lower-risk gamblers and 77.2 % of higher-risk gamblers. Predictors of lower-risk gambling included: greater confidence in their understanding of RG; endorsement of lower gambling expenditure and frequency limits; fewer erroneous gambling beliefs; being less likely to gamble to win money, challenge their skills/beat the odds, or forget about worries and stresses; and being more likely to gamble for pleasure/entertainment. Lower-risk gamblers were more likely to set a money limit in advance of gambling and to balance their gambling with other activities. These findings contribute to understanding which strategies are favoured by different risk groups, and which are associated with safer levels of gambling. They can guide consumer information aimed at enhancing RG consumption and future research on RG consumption.

Keywords:  Non-problem gambling; Problem gambling; Responsible gambling; Safe gambling; Self-regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27150462     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-016-9615-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  15 in total

1.  Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities.

Authors:  Shawn R Currie; David C Hodgins; JianLi Wang; Nady el-Guebaly; Harold Wynne; Sophie Chen
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Pilot study of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.

Authors:  John A Cunningham; David C Hodgins; Tony Toneatto; Aanchal Rai; Joanne Cordingley
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2008-11-06

3.  The self-regulation of gambling.

Authors:  Susan M Moore; Anna C Thomas; Michael Kyrios; Glen Bates
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2012-09

4.  Understanding Positive Play: An Exploration of Playing Experiences and Responsible Gambling Practices.

Authors:  Richard T A Wood; Mark D Griffiths
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

5.  The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies.

Authors:  Sally M Gainsbury; Alex Russell; Nerilee Hing; Robert Wood; Dan I Lubman; Alex Blaszczynski
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-05-26

6.  Health promotion and the knowledge-attitude-behavior continuum.

Authors:  E P Bettinghaus
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students.

Authors:  G Agostinelli; J M Brown; W R Miller
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts?

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Karen W Cullen; Theresa Nicklas; Deborah Thompson; Janice Baranowski
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-10

9.  A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.

Authors:  John A Cunningham; David C Hodgins; Tony Toneatto; Michelle Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms.

Authors:  Erika Langham; Hannah Thorne; Matthew Browne; Phillip Donaldson; Judy Rose; Matthew Rockloff
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  6 in total

1.  An Exploratory RCT to Support Gamblers' Intentions to Stick to Monetary Limits: A Brief Intervention Using Action and Coping Planning.

Authors:  Simone N Rodda; Kathleen L Bagot; Victoria Manning; Dan I Lubman
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2020-03

2.  Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs and Adherence to Responsible Gambling Practices: The Mediating Role of Flourishing.

Authors:  Kwok Kit Tong; Anise M S Wu; Juliet Honglei Chen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2022-01-08

3.  Measuring Responsible Gambling amongst Players: Development of the Positive Play Scale.

Authors:  Richard T A Wood; Michael J A Wohl; Nassim Tabri; Kahlil Philander
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-23

4.  Predicting future harm from gambling over a five-year period in a general population sample: a survival analysis.

Authors:  Shawn R Currie; David C Hodgins; Robert J Williams; Kirsten Fiest
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 5.  A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling.

Authors:  Simone N Rodda
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 6.756

6.  Avoiding gambling harm: An evidence-based set of safe gambling practices for consumers.

Authors:  Nerilee Hing; Matthew Browne; Alex M T Russell; Matthew Rockloff; Vijay Rawat; Fiona Nicoll; Garry Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.