Literature DB >> 27149393

The role of feedback contingency in perceptual category learning.

F Gregory Ashby1, Lauren E Vucovich1.   

Abstract

Feedback is highly contingent on behavior if it eventually becomes easy to predict, and weakly contingent on behavior if it remains difficult or impossible to predict even after learning is complete. Many studies have demonstrated that humans and nonhuman animals are highly sensitive to feedback contingency, but no known studies have examined how feedback contingency affects category learning, and current theories assign little or no importance to this variable. Two experiments examined the effects of contingency degradation on rule-based and information-integration category learning. In rule-based tasks, optimal accuracy is possible with a simple explicit rule, whereas optimal accuracy in information-integration tasks requires integrating information from 2 or more incommensurable perceptual dimensions. In both experiments, participants each learned rule-based or information-integration categories under either high or low levels of feedback contingency. The exact same stimuli were used in all 4 conditions, and optimal accuracy was identical in every condition. Learning was good in both high-contingency conditions, but most participants showed little or no evidence of learning in either low-contingency condition. Possible causes of these effects, as well as their theoretical implications, are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27149393      PMCID: PMC5097011          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  46 in total

1.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Authors:  E M Waldron; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Jessica L Roeder; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action-outcome contingency and contiguity.

Authors:  D R Shanks; A Dickinson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

4.  Chronic stress causes frontostriatal reorganization and affects decision-making.

Authors:  Eduardo Dias-Ferreira; João C Sousa; Irene Melo; Pedro Morgado; Ana R Mesquita; João J Cerqueira; Rui M Costa; Nuno Sousa
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates.

Authors:  B W Balleine; A Dickinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Reinforcer specificity of the suppression of instrumental performance on a non-contingent schedule.

Authors:  A Dickinson; C W Mulatero
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Array models for category learning.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Peter Dayan; Johannes Schultz; Ralf Deichmann; Karl Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  Category-Induced Transfer of Visual Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Qingleng Tan; Zhiyan Wang; Yuka Sasaki; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Increased cognitive load enables unlearning in procedural category learning.

Authors:  Matthew J Crossley; W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Expectation Learning for Stimulus Prediction Across Modalities Improves Unisensory Classification.

Authors:  Pablo Barros; Manfred Eppe; German I Parisi; Xun Liu; Stefan Wermter
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  During Lipreading Training With Sentence Stimuli, Feedback Controls Learning and Generalization to Audiovisual Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 5.  Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Nicole Jordan; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning.

Authors:  Katerina Dolguikh; Tyrus Tracey; Mark R Blair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Modulation of Dopamine for Adaptive Learning: A Neurocomputational Model.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Inglis; Vivian V Valentin; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Comput Brain Behav       Date:  2020-06-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.