| Literature DB >> 27148491 |
Azar Dokht Khosravi1, Abdolrazagh Hashemi Shahraki2, Mohammad Hashemzadeh3, Rasa Sheini Mehrabzadeh4, Ali Teimoori5.
Abstract
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are among the emerging pathogens in immunocompromised individuals including hospitalized patients. So, it is important to consider hospitals water supplies as a source for infection. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NTM in the hospital aquatic systems of Khuzestan, South west of Iran. In total, 258 hospital water samples were collected and examined. After initial sample processing, sediment of each sample were inoculated into two Lowenstein-Jensen medium. The positive cultures were studied with phenotypic tests including growth rate, colony morphology, and pigmentation, with subsequent PCR- restriction enzyme analysis (PRA) and rpoB gene sequence analysis. Mycobacterial strains were isolated from 77 samples (29.8%), comprising 52 (70.1%) rapid growing, and 25 (32.4%) slow growing mycobacteria. Based on the overall results, M. fortuitum (44.1%) was the most common mycobacterial species in hospital water samples, followed by M. gordonae (n = 13, 16.8%) and M. senegalense (n = 5, 7.7%). In conclusion, current study demonstrated the NTM strains as one of the major parts of hospital water supplies with probable potential source for nosocomial infections. This finding also help to shed light on to the dynamics of the distribution and diversity of NTM in the water system of hospitals in the region of study.Entities:
Keywords: non-tuberculous mycobacteria; polymerase chain reaction; restriction enzyme analysis; water samples
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27148491 PMCID: PMC4829604 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Distribution of water samples from hospitals in different cities of Khuzestan, Iran.
| Ahvaz | 47 (26.1%) | 115 (63.8%) | 18 (10%) | 180 (40%) |
| Abadan | 17 (42.5%) | 22 (55%) | 1 (2.5%) | 40 (12.3%) |
| Dezful | 13 (34.2%) | 23 (60.5%) | 2 (5.2%) | 38 (13.3%) |
Results of NTM identification by phenotypic and molecular tests using combination of phenotypic and molecular methods.
| 34 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 2 | unknown | ||
| 1 | unknown | ||
| 1 | Unidentified | ||
| 1 | unknown | Unidentified | |
PRA, PCR restriction enzyme analysis.
Figure 1. The support of each branch, as determined from 1000 bootstrap samples, is indicated by percentages at each node. Bar 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Frequency of NTM isolates from different hospital water sources.
| Hospital Tap water | 135 | 26 | |
| Dentistry units water | 54 | 22 | |
| Haemodialysis center | 17 | 8 | |
| Ventilator water | 25 | 7 | |
| Water tank | 27 | 14 |
Figure 2Geographic distribution of NTM species among the hospitals of three area of Khuzestan.