| Literature DB >> 27148332 |
Teresa Ribeiro1, Ricardo M Barrela2, Hélène Bergès3, Cristina Marques4, João Loureiro5, Leonor Morais-Cecílio1, Jorge A P Paiva6.
Abstract
The genus Eucalyptus encloses several species with high ecological and economic value, being the subgenus Symphyomyrtus one of the most important. Species such as E. grandis and E. globulus are well characterized at the molecular level but knowledge regarding genome and chromosome organization is very scarce. Here we characterized and compared the karyotypes of three economically important species, E. grandis, E. globulus, and E. calmadulensis, and three with ecological relevance, E. pulverulenta, E. cornuta, and E. occidentalis, through an integrative approach including genome size estimation, fluorochrome banding, rDNA FISH, and BAC landing comprising genes involved in lignin biosynthesis. All karyotypes show a high degree of conservation with pericentromeric 35S and 5S rDNA loci in the first and third pairs, respectively. GC-rich heterochromatin was restricted to the 35S rDNA locus while the AT-rich heterochromatin pattern was species-specific. The slight differences in karyotype formulas and distribution of AT-rich heterochromatin, along with genome sizes estimations, support the idea of Eucalyptus genome evolution by local expansions of heterochromatin clusters. The unusual co-localization of both rDNA with AT-rich heterochromatin was attributed mainly to the presence of silent transposable elements in those loci. The cinnamoyl CoA reductase gene (CCR1) previously assessed to linkage group 10 (LG10) was clearly localized distally at the long arm of chromosome 9 establishing an unexpected correlation between the cytogenetic chromosome 9 and the LG10. Our work is novel and contributes to the understanding of Eucalyptus genome organization which is essential to develop successful advanced breeding strategies for this genus.Entities:
Keywords: BAC-landing; CCR1; Eucalyptus; FISH; ROP1; heterochromatin; transposable elements
Year: 2016 PMID: 27148332 PMCID: PMC4840385 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Taxonomical classification of the plant material, native distribution, seeds provenance, and voucher numbers [LISI designation is in accordance to .
| Symphyomyrtus | Bisectae | Western Australia | ISA campus | LISI 364/2015 | |
| Symphyomyrtus | Bisectae | Western Australia | ISA campus | LISI 369/2015 | |
| Symphyomyrtus | Latoangulatae | Australia | ISA campus | LISI 365/2015 | |
| Symphyomyrtus | Maidenaria | Tasmania | ISA campus | LISI 366/2015 | |
| Symphyomyrtus | Maidenaria | New Sowth Wales | ISA campus | LISI 367/2015 | |
| Symphyomyrtus | Exsertaria | Australia | ISA campus | LISI 368/2015 |
Summary of the statistics of sequenced and assembled BAC clones.
| EGC_Ba_P37H11 | EglCCR1 | 64,290 | 93 | 14 | 138,584 |
| EGC_Ba_P22O03 | EglRAC1 | 80,593 | 93 | 37 | 141,706 |
Figure 1Fluorescence . Insets showing the 35S rDNA locus (NOR) organization: (D) E. grandis pattern with decondensed domain in the secondary constriction and two condensed domains in both edges (red) of the NOR; Inset in (E) showing a decondensed domain in the secondary constriction and one condensed domain in the distal end (red). Bar = 5 μm.
Karyotype measurements of .
| 1 | 2.58 ± 0.17 | 1.13 ± 0.06 | m | 2.65 ± 0.20 | 1.20 ± 0.13 | m | 2.52 ± 0.12 | 1.06 ± 0.04 | m | 2.61 ± 0.13 | 1.19 ± 0.15 | m | 2.67 ± 0.18 | 1.05 ± 0.07 | m | 2.44 ± 0.15 | 1.16 ± 0.02 | m |
| 2 | 2.46 ± 0.08 | 1.04 ± 0.06 | m | 2.50 ± 0.10 | 1.13 ± 0.10 | m | 2.45 ± 0.04 | 1.08 ± 0.04 | m | 2.55 ± 0.09 | 1.04 ± 0.03 | m | 2.57 ± 0.09 | 1.04 ± 0.01 | M | 2.28 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | M |
| 3 | 2.32 ± 0.05 | 1.18 ± 0.09 | m | 2.44 ± 0.08 | 1.17 ± 0.09 | m | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 1.26 ± 0.08 | m | 2.49 ± 0.08 | 1.26 ± 0.09 | m | 2.44 ± 0.08 | 1.25 ± 0.09 | m | 2.16 ± 0.06 | 1.06 ± 0.06 | m |
| 4 | 2.20 ± 0.07 | 1.13 ± 0.12 | m | 2.33 ± 0.07 | 1.45 ± 0.13 | m | 2.28 ± 0.06 | 1.40 ± 0.09 | m | 2.40 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | m | 2.30 ± 0,07 | 1.02 ± 0.02 | M | 2.05 ± 0.05 | 1.09 ± 0.10 | m |
| 5 | 2.11 ± 0.06 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | M | 2.20 ± 0.07 | 1.11 ± 0.04 | m | 2.22 ± 0.07 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | M | 2.34 ± 0.08 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | m | 2.22 ± 0.07 | 1.04 ± 0.04 | m | 1.92 ± 0.07 | 1.19 ± 0.13 | m |
| 6 | 2.00 ± 0.05 | 1.15 ± 0.08 | m | 2.13 ± 0.09 | 1.73 ± 0.31 | sm | 2.15 ± 0.06 | 1.26 ± 0.02 | m | 2.22 ± 0.06 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | M | 2.15 ± 0.09 | 1.22 ± 0.05 | m | 1.81 ± 0.08 | 1.28 ± 0.09 | m |
| 7 | 1.89 ± 0.06 | 1.25 ± 0.06 | m | 1.90 ± 0.08 | 1.47 ± 0.14 | m | 2.03 ± 0.08 | 1.46 ± 0.10 | m | 2.05 ± 0.07 | 1.25 ± 0.15 | m | 1.95 ± 0.06 | 1.43 ± 0.08 | m | 1.68 ± 0.07 | 1.25 ± 0.09 | m |
| 8 | 1.76 ± 0.06 | 1.68 ± 0.23 | sm | 1.78 ± 0.06 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | m | 1.82 ± 0.06 | 1.17 ± 0.03 | m | 1.86 ± 0.05 | 1.36 ± 0.07 | m | 1.81 ± 0.08 | 1.42 ± 0.05 | m | 1.56 ± 0.05 | 1.19 ± 0.08 | m |
| 9 | 1.65 ± 0.04 | 1.11 ± 0.09 | m | 1.66 ± 0.04 | 1.18 ± 0.10 | m | 1.68 ± 0.04 | 1.07 ± 0.05 | m | 1.70 ± 0.04 | 1.16 ± 0.05 | m | 1.62 ± 0.06 | 1.23 ± 0.04 | m | 1.46 ± 0.04 | 1.14 ± 0.06 | m |
| 10 | 1.56 ± 0.04 | 1.50 ± 0.18 | sm | 1.52 ± 0.05 | 1.26 ± 0.15 | m | 1.54 ± 0.04 | 1.21 ± 0.05 | m | 1.56 ± 0.05 | 1.41 ± 0.11 | m | 1.47 ± 0.06 | 1.06 ± 0.04 | m | 1.36 ± 0.03 | 1.46 ± 0.14 | m |
| 11 | 1.52 ± 0.03 | 1.07 ± 0.05 | m | 1.44 ± 0.05 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | M | 1.48 ± 0.03 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | M | 1.46 ± 0.04 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | M | 1.38 ± 0.05 | 1.03 ± 0.05 | m | 1.32 ± 0.01 | 1.08 ± 0.07 | m |
| ∑ | 22.05 ± 0.71 | 22.55 ± 0.89 | 22.53 ± 0.65 | 23.24 ± 0.77 | 22.58 ± 0.89 | 20.04 ± 0.68 | ||||||||||||
Estimation of absolute DNA nuclear content in .
| 1.25 | 0.030 | 2.4 | 1.21 | 1.30 | 11 | |
| 1.27 | 0.039 | 3.1 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 11 | |
| 1.26 | 0.017 | 1.3 | 1.23 | 1.28 | 10 | |
The values are given as mean and standard deviation (SD) of the nuclear DNA content (2C in picograms) of the individuals. Information of the CV value of the genome size estimations, as well as, of the minimum and maximum values is also provided. The number of analyzed individuals is also given. No statistically significant values at P < 0.05 were observed among species.
Figure 2Karyograms of . Missing homologous chromosomes were folded over itself in the analyzed metaphases and were unable to be used in these karyograms.
Figure 3Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) banding (green) in chromosomes of . The CMA positive band is always co-localized with 35S rDNA (red/orange) (B) and with the DAPI+ in E. grandis (inset in B). Bar = 5 μm.
Figure 4Fluorescence . E. occidentallis metaphase chromosomes with 35S rDNA (red), 5S rDNA (green), and BAC-CCR (yellow) localizations. Bar = 5 μm.
Figure 5Fluorescence . Co-localization (white arrows) with the 5S rDNA (A) and the 35S rDNA condensed and decondensed domains (B). Bar = 5 μm.
Figure 6Karyograms of .