| Literature DB >> 27148095 |
Angela R Ozburn1, Kush Purohit2, Puja K Parekh2, Gabrielle N Kaplan2, Edgardo Falcon3, Shibani Mukherjee4, Hannah M Cates5, Colleen A McClung2.
Abstract
Circadian rhythm disruptions are prominently associated with bipolar disorder (BD). Circadian rhythms are regulated by the molecular clock, a family of proteins that function together in a transcriptional-translational feedback loop. The CLOCK protein is a key transcription factor of this feedback loop, and previous studies have found that manipulations of the Clock gene are sufficient to produce manic-like behavior in mice (1). The CLOCK 3111T/C single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; rs1801260) is a genetic variation of the human CLOCK gene that is significantly associated with increased frequency of manic episodes in BD patients (2). The 3111T/C SNP is located in the 3'-untranslated region of the CLOCK gene. In this study, we sought to examine the functional implications of the human CLOCK 3111T/C SNP by transfecting a mammalian cell line (mouse embryonic fibroblasts isolated from Clock(-/-) knockout mice) with pcDNA plasmids containing the human CLOCK gene with either the T or C SNP at position 3111. We then measured circadian gene expression over a 24-h time period. We found that the CLOCK3111C SNP resulted in higher mRNA levels than the CLOCK 3111T SNP. Furthermore, we found that Per2, a transcriptional target of CLOCK, was also more highly expressed with CLOCK 3111C expression, indicating that the 3'-UTR SNP affects the expression, function, and stability of CLOCK mRNA.Entities:
Keywords: bipolar disorder; cell culture; circadian; clock; gene expression; single-nucleotide polymorphism
Year: 2016 PMID: 27148095 PMCID: PMC4838618 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1. (A) Npas2 expression is significantly increased in Clock KO MEFS. *P < 0.05. (B) Npas2 shRNA results in significantly decreased Npas2 expression as compared with Scramble shRNA (representative data from CT21).
Figure 2Fold change difference in . Clock 3111C gene expression is significantly higher than 3111T expression. *P < 0.05.
Figure 3Twenty-four-hour expression of . Clock 3111C gene expression over 24 h is significantly higher than Clock 3111T expression. ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Figure 4Twenty-four-hour expression of . Clock3111C gene expression over 24 h is significantly higher than Clock3111T expression. ****P < 0.0001.