Literature DB >> 27147849

Acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD).

Khushnum Pastakia1, Saravana Kumar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) is the term given for the collection of symptoms affecting the neck that are triggered by an accident with an acceleration-deceleration mechanism such as a motor vehicle accident. The incidence of whiplash injury varies greatly between different parts of the world with significant monetary burden on the individual as well as the wider community.
OBJECTIVE: Which treatments are best for reducing pain and disability experience in acute WADs? LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials. SEARCH SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, AUST health, AMED. OUTCOMES: From the patient perspective the main outcomes considered are pain and disability. CONSUMER
SUMMARY: Whiplash-associated disorders include a range of symptoms related to the neck and head. They commonly occur after motor vehicle accidents or diving mishaps. There is good evidence to suggest that active exercise, acting as usual and combination therapy are the most effective treatment choices in an acute presentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  multimodel therapy; neckpain; pain levels; whiplash

Year:  2011        PMID: 27147849      PMCID: PMC4753964          DOI: 10.2147/OAEM.S17853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med        ISSN: 1179-1500


Acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD)

Definition:

Whiplash can be defined as “an acceleration–deceleration mechanism of energy transfer to the neck. It may result from rear-end or side-impact motor vehicle collisions, but can also occur during diving or other mishaps. The impact may result in bony or soft-tissue injuries (whiplash-injury), which in turn may lead to a variety of clinical manifestations called Whiplash-Associated Disorders”.1 Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) is the term given for the collection of symptoms affecting the neck that are triggered by an accident with an acceleration–deceleration mechanism such as a motor vehicle accident.2 The Quebec Task Force classifies patients with whiplash, based on the severity of signs and symptoms, as follows:3 Grade 0: No complaints about the neck. No physical sign(s). Grade I: Neck complaint of pain, stiffness or tenderness only. No physical sign(s). Grade II: Neck complaint AND musculoskeletal sign(s). Musculoskeletal signs include decreased range of motion and point tenderness. Grade III: Neck complaint AND neurological sign(s). Neurological signs include decreased range of motion and point tenderness. Grade IV: Neck complaint AND fracture or dislocation. The worldwide annual incidence of symptomatic whiplash injuries varies between 16 and 200 per 100,000.4 The incidence of whiplash injury varies greatly between different parts of the world, with rates as high as 70 per 100,000 inhabitants in Quebec, Canada, 106 per 100,000 in Australia, and 188 to 325 per 100,000 inhabitants in the Netherlands.5 According to the World Health Organisation, traffic injuries constitute approximately 1% of the combined gross national products of the nations of the western world.5 One review states that 20%–40% of whiplash patients tend to develop chronic symptoms.6 It is reported that WAD account for 42% of compulsory third party claims in New South Wales, Australia, and the cost associated with rehabilitating whiplash is the highest of any musculoskeletal injury in the scheme.7 This results in a significant monetary burden on the individual as well as the wider community.

The evidence

Which treatments are best for reducing pain and disability experience in acute WADs?

Active exercise

The guidelines3,8,9 recommend that implementing range of motion exercises immediately results in reduced pain levels and improved function. The systematic reviews10–12 found that exercise (range of motion and neck and scapular strengthening exercises) is beneficial in relieving neck pain in acute whiplash injuries. One systematic review12 cautions that exercise may produce transitory increase in pain levels but is beneficial in the long run for reducing pain. The meta-analysis13 concluded that specific exercises such as neck stabilization exercise showed significant short-term effects on pain levels in whiplash disorders. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) generally found that active exercises were more effective in reducing pain and improving function especially when implemented early (within 96 hours) after injury (Table 1).
Table 1

RCTs comparing active intervention versus other conservative interventions

AuthorNumber randomizedInterventionsOutcome measuresResults
Rosenfeld 20065100Group 1: Active involvement and intervention using early mobilizationPainActive intervention group experienced reduced pain and costs
Group 2: A standard intervention of rest, recommended short-term immobilization in a cervical collar and a cautious, gradual self-exercise program according to a leafletCost of treatment
Schnabel 200414200Group 1: Used a collarPainEarly exercise therapy is superior to the collar therapy for reducing pain intensity and disability
Group 2: Active exercisesDisability
Following a whiplash injury, early implementation of active exercise has a positive effect on pain and disability. It is best to seek advice from your doctor or health provider before performing exercises.

Act as usual

The guidelines3,8,9 concluded that patients who act as usual post-whiplash injury have significantly better outcomes with respect to pain and function. The systematic reviews15–17 recommend that patients suffering from acute WAD be prescribed advice to “act as usual” as it encourages function early on after the injury and thus results in reduced disability and pain. The RCT18 concluded that “act as usual” advice by itself is a sufficient intervention to reduce pain when the initial pain intensity is fairly low. In the case of higher pain intensities, it works best when used in conjunction with other active forms of therapy such as exercise. “Act as usual” within tolerable levels for a WAD is effective in reducing pain and improving function, especially in the early stages after the injury.

Multimodal therapy

The guidelines3,9 conclude that multimodal therapy can be used for a WAD that has not settled within 4 to 6 weeks providing there is evidence of continuing improvement with the treatment. The systematic reviews13,17,19 state that there is strong evidence for multimodal therapy that includes mobilization, relaxation, and an exercise focus. The therapy may also include medication, heat/cold therapy, and education. One of the reviews17 found strong evidence supporting the use of multimodal therapy in the period between 2 and 12 weeks following whiplash injury. Multimodal therapy may be more effective than individual treatments provided in isolation. It should consist of at least mobilization and/or mobilization and some form of exercise.

The practice

Potential pitfalls

As whiplash can be a traumatic event, care should be taken, especially in the initial stages, to closely monitor the patient’s progress. Be sure to work within the patient’s pain threshold (as it may vary from one individual to another) and progress treatments slowly to avoid sudden flare-ups.

Management

Acute WAD can be managed by a number of health professionals, namely, general practitioners, physiotherapists, and chiropractors. Indications for specialist referral are given below. A detailed subjective examination, including current and past history, mechanism of injury, behavior of symptoms, and detailed description of symptoms should be undertaken. As part of routine screening, a detailed overview of general health, social support, and medical history should be undertaken. Objective assessment of the neck includes: – Range of motion, active and passive (physiological and accessory) – Palpation of the cervical and thoracic region – Cervicothoracic musculature (length and strength) – Neural dynamics – Neurological Vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) Provide patient with general mobility exercises for the cervical and thoracic spine. Stabilization exercises should be provided, targeting deep neck flexors and scapula stabilizers. Especially in the early stages, it is important to advise patients to act as usual (eg, continue with their activities of daily living) within tolerable levels to promote early return to function. Avoidance of movement due to fear of pain, especially in the early stages of whiplash, could result in prolonging the symptoms and delaying recovery. Therefore reassure the patient that continuing to maintain movement is harmless and will aid in long-term improvement. Educate the patient about the mechanism of injury, structures affected and provide a realistic overview of treatment options and prognosis. As part of the ongoing management of a patient with whiplash, multimodal therapy could also be considered. Multimodal therapy can be in the form of manual therapies (such as joint mobilization), relaxation techniques, ongoing education, and exercises. These treatments can be provided as a package of care. Grade IV WAD Worsening signs and symptoms despite treatment Signs and symptoms of VBI Signs and symptoms of neurological involvement
Clinical practice guidelines3
Systematic reviews3
Meta-analysis1
Randomized controlled trials2
Clinical practice guidelines3
Systematic reviews3
RCTs1
Clinical practice guidelines2
Systematic reviews3
  15 in total

Review 1.  A review of treatment interventions in whiplash-associated disorders.

Authors:  Aris Seferiadis; Mark Rosenfeld; Ronny Gunnarsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  7. Whiplash-associated disorders.

Authors:  Hans van Suijlekom; Nagy Mekhail; Nileshkumar Patel; Jan Van Zundert; Maarten van Kleef; Jacob Patijn
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Evaluating two implementation strategies for whiplash guidelines in physiotherapy: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Trudy Rebbeck; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2006

4.  Active involvement and intervention in patients exposed to whiplash trauma in automobile crashes reduces costs: a randomized, controlled clinical trial and health economic evaluation.

Authors:  Mark Rosenfeld; Aris Seferiadis; Ronny Gunnarsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Comparison of randomized treatments for late whiplash.

Authors:  U Pato; G Di Stefano; N Fravi; M Arnold; M Curatolo; B P Radanov; P Ballinari; M Sturzenegger
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; M L Skovron; L R Salmi; J D Cassidy; J Duranceau; S Suissa; E Zeiss
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  The efficacy of conservative treatment in patients with whiplash injury: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  G G Peeters; A P Verhagen; R A de Bie; R A Oostendorp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.

Authors:  T M Kay; A Gross; C Goldsmith; P L Santaguida; J Hoving; G Bronfort
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

9.  Clinical practice implications of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: from concepts and findings to recommendations.

Authors:  Jaime Guzman; Scott Haldeman; Linda J Carroll; Eugene J Carragee; Eric L Hurwitz; Paul Peloso; Margareta Nordin; J David Cassidy; Lena W Holm; Pierre Côté; Gabrielle van der Velde; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 10.  Conservative treatments for whiplash.

Authors:  A P Verhagen; G G G M Scholten-Peeters; S van Wijngaarden; R A de Bie; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting outcome in whiplash injury: a systematic meta-review of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Pooria Sarrami; Elizabeth Armstrong; Justine M Naylor; Ian A Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-10-13

2.  Factors influencing outcomes among patients with whiplash-associated disorder: A population-based study in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hayashi; Kenji Miki; Tatsunori Ikemoto; Takahiro Ushida; Masahiko Shibata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors.

Authors:  Somaye Kazeminasab; Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi; Parastoo Amiri; Hojjat Pourfathi; Mostafa Araj-Khodaei; Mark J M Sullman; Ali-Asghar Kolahi; Saeid Safiri
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Bone Fracture Patterns and Distributions according to Trauma Energy.

Authors:  Ahmad Almigdad; Ayman Mustafa; Sattam Alazaydeh; Mu'men Alshawish; Mohammad Bani Mustafa; Hamza Alfukaha
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-09-09

5.  Differences between spinal cord injury and cervical compressive myelopathy in intramedullary high-intensity lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Naosuke Kamei; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Toshio Nakamae; Takayuki Tamura; Yuji Tsuchikawa; Taiki Moisakos; Takahiro Harada; Toshiaki Maruyama; Nobuo Adachi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.