Literature DB >> 19251069

Clinical practice implications of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: from concepts and findings to recommendations.

Jaime Guzman1, Scott Haldeman, Linda J Carroll, Eugene J Carragee, Eric L Hurwitz, Paul Peloso, Margareta Nordin, J David Cassidy, Lena W Holm, Pierre Côté, Gabrielle van der Velde, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Best evidence synthesis.
OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence-based guidance to primary care clinicians about how to best assess and treat patients with neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a need to translate the results of clinical and epidemiologic studies into meaningful and practical information for clinicians.
METHODS: Based on best evidence syntheses of published studies on the risk, prognosis, assessment, and management of people with neck pain and its associated disorders, plus additional research projects and focused literature reviews reported in this supplement, the 12-member multidisciplinary Scientific Secretariat of the Neck Pain Task Force followed a 4-step approach to develop practical guidance for clinicians.
RESULTS: The Neck Pain Task Force recommends that people seeking care for neck pain should be triaged into 4 groups: Grade I neck pain with no signs of major pathology and no or little interference with daily activities; Grade II neck pain with no signs of major pathology, but interference with daily activities; Grade III neck pain with neurologic signs of nerve compression; Grade IV neck pain with signs of major pathology. In the emergency room after blunt trauma to the neck, triage should be based on the NEXUS criteria or the Canadian C-spine rule. Those with a high risk of fracture should be further investigated with plain radiographs and/or CT-scan. In ambulatory primary care, triage should be based on history and physical examination alone, including screening for red flags and neurologic examination for signs of radiculopathy. Exercises and mobilization have been shown to provide some degree of short-term relief of Grade I or Grade II neck pain after a motor vehicle collision. Exercises, mobilization, manipulation, analgesics, acupuncture, and low-level laser have been shown to provide some degree of short-term relief of Grade I or Grade II neck pain without trauma. Those with confirmed Grade III and severe persistent radicular symptoms might benefit from corticosteroid injections or surgery. Those with confirmed Grade IV neck pain require management specific to the diagnosed pathology.
CONCLUSION: The best available evidence suggests initial assessment for neck pain should focus on triage into 4 grades, and those with common neck pain (Grade I and Grade II) might be offered the listed noninvasive treatments if short-term relief is desired.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19251069     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  7 in total

1.  Cardiovascular responses to an acute psychological stressor are associated with the cortisol awakening response in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Bahar Shahidi; Timothy Sannes; Mark Laudenslager; Katrina S Maluf
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-02-07

2.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: classification system for spine-related concerns.

Authors:  Scott Haldeman; Claire D Johnson; Roger Chou; Margareta Nordin; Pierre Côté; Eric L Hurwitz; Bart N Green; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Christine Cedraschi; Ellen Aartun; Emre Acaroğlu; Arthur Ameis; Selim Ayhan; Fiona Blyth; David Borenstein; O'Dane Brady; Fereydoun Davatchi; Christine Goertz; Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni; Jan Hartvigsen; Maria Hondras; Nadège Lemeunier; John Mayer; Silvano Mior; Tiro Mmopelwa; Michael Modic; Rajani Mullerpatan; Lillian Mwaniki; Madeleine Ngandeu-Singwe; Geoff Outerbridge; Kristi Randhawa; Erkin Sönmez; Carlos Torres; Paola Torres; William Watters; Hainan Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection.

Authors:  Leire Leonet-Tijero; Jaime Corral-de-Toro; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Mar Hernández-Secorún; Hugo Abenia-Benedí; María Orosia Lucha-López; Sofía Monti-Ballano; Julián Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte; Héctor Tricás-Vidal; César Hidalgo-García; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

4.  Using a psychosocial subgroup assignment to predict sickness absence in a working population with neck and back pain.

Authors:  Cecilia Bergström; Jan Hagberg; Lennart Bodin; Irene Jensen; Gunnar Bergström
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Effect of manual versus mechanically assisted manipulations of the thoracic spine in neck pain patients: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anke Langenfeld; B Kim Humphreys; Rob A de Bie; Jaap Swanenburg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Neck pain in South Africa: An overview of the prevalence, assessment and management for the contemporary clinician.

Authors:  Cato A Basson; Benita Olivier; Alison Rushton
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2019-09-04

7.  Acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD).

Authors:  Khushnum Pastakia; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.