Literature DB >> 27147416

A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage.

Santo Davide Ferrara1, Viviana Ananian2, Eric Baccino3, Rafael Boscolo-Berto2, Ranieri Domenici4, Claudio Hernàndez-Cueto5, George Mendelson6, Gian Aristide Norelli7, Mohammed Ranavaya8, Claudio Terranova2, Duarte Nuno Vieira9, Guido Viel2, Enrique Villanueva10, Riccardo Zoia11, Giuseppe Sartori12.   

Abstract

Personal injury is a legal term for a physical or psychic injury suffered by the plaintiff under civil and/or tort law. With reference to non-pecuniary damages, the evidence itself of physical and/or psychic injury is not sufficient for damage compensation. The process of ascertaining impairments and/or disabilities which pertain to the "personal sphere" of the individual, such as pain and suffering, loss of amenity, and/or psycho-existential damage, poses particular difficulties in relation to the obtainment of scientific evidence. The "immateriality" and the subjective connotation of the personal sphere are, in themselves, critical issues. The clinical data obtained from the neuropsychological ascertainment find their essential prerequisite in the active participation of the examinee who, in legally relevant contexts (criminal law, civil law, insurance), may be "affected" by personal interests. The present manuscript presents a novel interdisciplinary methodology, experimented on a series of judicial and extra-judicial cases, aimed at the attainment of objectivity and accuracy eligible in relation to the judicial settlement of cases and other matters involving the ascertainment of peculiar aspects of non-pecuniary damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malingering; Methods of ascertainment; Personal damage; Psycho-existential damage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147416     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-016-1366-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  19 in total

1.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Combining the P300-complex trial-based concealed information test and the reaction time-based autobiographical implicit association test in concealed memory detection.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; J Peter Rosenfeld
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Utility of the Rey-15 recognition trial to detect invalid performance in a forensic neuropsychological sample.

Authors:  Chelsea L Morse; Kara Douglas-Newman; Steven Mandel; Thomas Swirsky-Sacchetti
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Detection of malingering in psychiatric unit and general population prison inmates: a comparison of the PAI, SIMS, and SIRS.

Authors:  John F Edens; Norman G Poythress; M Monica Watkins-Clay
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2007-02

5.  Accuracy of MMPI-2-RF validity scales for identifying feigned PTSD symptoms, random responding, and genuine PTSD.

Authors:  Lisa H Mason; Anne L Shandera-Ochsner; Kimberly D Williamson; Jordan P Harp; Maryanne Edmundson; David T R Berry; Walter M High
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2013-08-01

6.  Combating automatic autobiographical associations: the effect of instruction and training in strategically concealing information in the autobiographical implicit association test.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; J Peter Rosenfeld; Galen V Bodenhausen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-08-15

7.  Comparison of MMPI-2 and PAI validity indicators to detect feigned depression and PTSD symptom reporting.

Authors:  Rael T Lange; Karen A Sullivan; Clinton Scott
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Performance of forensic and non-forensic adult psychiatric inpatients on the Test of Memory Malingering.

Authors:  Susan D Gierok; Andrew L Dickson; Jack A Cole
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  Cross validation of the b Test in a large known groups sample.

Authors:  Cedria J Roberson; Kyle Brauer Boone; Hope Goldberg; Deborah Miora; Maria Cottingham; Tara Victor; Elizabeth Ziegler; Michelle Zeller; Matthew Wright
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Classification accuracy of the Portland digit recognition test in persons claiming exposure to environmental and industrial toxins.

Authors:  Kevin W Greve; Kevin J Bianchini; Matthew T Heinly; Jeffrey M Love; Douglas A Swift; Megan Ciota
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.813

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression.

Authors:  Merylin Monaro; Andrea Toncini; Stefano Ferracuti; Gianmarco Tessari; Maria G Vaccaro; Pasquale De Fazio; Giorgio Pigato; Tiziano Meneghel; Cristina Scarpazza; Giuseppe Sartori
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.