Literature DB >> 23905684

Accuracy of MMPI-2-RF validity scales for identifying feigned PTSD symptoms, random responding, and genuine PTSD.

Lisa H Mason1, Anne L Shandera-Ochsner, Kimberly D Williamson, Jordan P Harp, Maryanne Edmundson, David T R Berry, Walter M High.   

Abstract

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-RF (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales were evaluated to determine accuracy when differentiating honest responding, random responding, genuine posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and feigned PTSD. Undergraduate students (n = 109), screened for PTSD, were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 instructional groups: honest, feign PTSD, half random, and full random. Archival data provided clinical MMPI-2-RF profiles consisting of 31 veterans diagnosed with PTSD. Veterans were diagnosed with PTSD using a structured interview and had passed a structured interview for malingering. Validity scales working as a group had correct classification rates of honest (96.6%), full random (88.9%), genuine PTSD (80.7%), fake PTSD (73.1%), and half random (44.4%). Results were fairly supportive of the scales' ability to discriminate feigning and full random responding from honest responding of normal students as well as veterans with PTSD. However, the RF validity scales do not appear to be as effective in detecting partially random responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23905684     DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.819512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  3 in total

1.  Does Validity Measure Response Affect CPT Group Outcomes in Veterans with PTSD?

Authors:  M Wright Williams; David Graham; Nicole A Sciarrino; Matt Estey; Katherine L McCurry; Pearl Chiu; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The Effects of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Combined Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder on Returning Veterans.

Authors:  Hannah L Combs; David T R Berry; Theresa Pape; Judith Babcock-Parziale; Bridget Smith; Randal Schleenbaker; Anne Shandera-Ochsner; Jordan P Harp; Walter M High
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage.

Authors:  Santo Davide Ferrara; Viviana Ananian; Eric Baccino; Rafael Boscolo-Berto; Ranieri Domenici; Claudio Hernàndez-Cueto; George Mendelson; Gian Aristide Norelli; Mohammed Ranavaya; Claudio Terranova; Duarte Nuno Vieira; Guido Viel; Enrique Villanueva; Riccardo Zoia; Giuseppe Sartori
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.