Literature DB >> 27146637

Implications of Tobacco Industry Research on Packaging Colors for Designing Health Warning Labels.

Lauren K Lempert1, Stanton A Glantz2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health warning labels (HWLs) are an important way to educate the public about the dangers of tobacco products. Tobacco companies conducted research to understand how pack colors affect consumers' perceptions of the products and make packages and their labeling more visually prominent.
METHODS: We analyzed previously secret tobacco industry documents concerning the tobacco industry's internal research on how cigarette package colors and design influence the visual prominence of packages and consumers' perceptions of the harmfulness of the products.
RESULTS: The companies found that black is visually prominent, placing dark pack elements on a contrasting light background makes them stand out more, and black text on a white background is more prominent than white text on a black background. Yellow most quickly and effectively seizes and holds consumers' attention and signals warning or danger, while white connotes health and safety. Using black text on a bright contrasting background color, particularly yellow, attracts consumers' attention to the message.
CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco industry research on pack color choices that make pack elements more prominent, attract and keep consumers' attention, and convey danger instead of health should guide governments in specifying requirements for HWLs. These factors suggest that HWLs printed on a yellow background with black lettering and borders would most effectively seize and keep consumers' attention and signal the danger of cigarettes and other tobacco products. IMPLICATIONS: Tobacco companies' internal research on improving the prominence of pack elements suggests that HWLs using black lettering on a contrasting yellow background would most effectively seize and hold consumers' attention and signal the danger of cigarettes and other tobacco products.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146637      PMCID: PMC4978986          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  12 in total

1.  The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  M Wakefield; C Morley; J K Horan; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk.

Authors:  David Hammond; Carla Parkinson
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.

Authors:  David Hammond; Martin Dockrell; Deborah Arnott; Alex Lee; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S.

Authors:  Maansi Bansal-Travers; David Hammond; Philip Smith; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael K Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 6.  Implications of the federal court order banning the terms "light" and "mild": what difference could it make?

Authors:  Stacey J Anderson; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective.

Authors:  E J Strahan; K White; G T Fong; L R Fabrigar; M P Zanna; R Cameron
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 8.  Tobacco documents research methodology.

Authors:  Stacey J Anderson; Phyra M McCandless; Kim Klausner; Rachel Taketa; Valerie B Yerger
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.953

9.  How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.

Authors:  M A Wakefield; D Germain; S J Durkin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Has the tobacco industry evaded the FDA's ban on 'Light' cigarette descriptors?

Authors:  Gregory N Connolly; Hillel R Alpert
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Labels: Lessons Learned From the Tobacco Industry.

Authors:  Lucy Popova
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-12

2.  Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements.

Authors:  Jessica L King; Allison Lazard; Beth A Reboussin; Leah Ranney; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Regulating Cannabis Manufacturing: Applying Public Health Best Practices from Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Daniel G Orenstein; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  The Effects of Varying Electronic Cigarette Warning Label Design Features On Attention, Recall, and Product Perceptions Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Andrea Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Eric N Lindblom; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

5.  Strategies to enhance the effects of pictorial warnings for cigarettes: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Farahnaz Islam; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Rosibel Rodriguez-Bolaños; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James W Hardin; Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  The package as a weapon of influence: Changes to cigarette packaging design as a function of regulatory changes in Canada.

Authors:  Wade S Wade; Katherine White
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Kathryn Rehberg; Lilianna Phan; Melissa Mercincavage; George Luta; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.