M J Schacht1, C B Toustrup1, L B Madsen1, M S Martiny2, B B Larsen3, J T Simonsen3. 1. Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 2. Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. marimart@rm.dk. 3. VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) followed by a subsequent preliminary adequacy assessment and a preliminary diagnosis, was performed at Aarhus University Hospital by biomedical scientists (BMS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the BMS accuracy of ROSE adequacy assessment, the preliminary adequacy assessment and the preliminary diagnosis as compared with the cytopathologist-rendered final adequacy assessment and final diagnosis. METHODS: The BMS-rendered assessments for 717 sites from 319 consecutive patients over a 4-month period were compared with the cytopathologist-rendered assessments. Comparisons of adequacy and preliminary diagnoses were based on inter-observer Cohen's Kappa coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Strong correlations between ROSE and final adequacy assessments [Kappa coefficient of 0.90 (CI: 0.85-0.96)] and between the preliminary and final adequacy assessments [Kappa coefficient of 0.93 (CI: 0.87-0.99)] were found. As for the correlation between the preliminary and final diagnoses, the Kappa coefficient was 0.99 (CI: 0.98-1). CONCLUSION: Both ROSE and preliminary adequacy assessments as well as preliminary diagnoses, all performed by BMS, were highly accurate when compared with the final assessment by the cytopathologist.
OBJECTIVES: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) followed by a subsequent preliminary adequacy assessment and a preliminary diagnosis, was performed at Aarhus University Hospital by biomedical scientists (BMS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the BMS accuracy of ROSE adequacy assessment, the preliminary adequacy assessment and the preliminary diagnosis as compared with the cytopathologist-rendered final adequacy assessment and final diagnosis. METHODS: The BMS-rendered assessments for 717 sites from 319 consecutive patients over a 4-month period were compared with the cytopathologist-rendered assessments. Comparisons of adequacy and preliminary diagnoses were based on inter-observer Cohen's Kappa coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Strong correlations between ROSE and final adequacy assessments [Kappa coefficient of 0.90 (CI: 0.85-0.96)] and between the preliminary and final adequacy assessments [Kappa coefficient of 0.93 (CI: 0.87-0.99)] were found. As for the correlation between the preliminary and final diagnoses, the Kappa coefficient was 0.99 (CI: 0.98-1). CONCLUSION: Both ROSE and preliminary adequacy assessments as well as preliminary diagnoses, all performed by BMS, were highly accurate when compared with the final assessment by the cytopathologist.