Literature DB >> 27146422

Ear tagging in piglets: the cortisol response with and without analgesia in comparison with castration and tail docking.

J Numberger1, M Ritzmann1, N Übel1, M Eddicks1, S Reese2, S Zöls1.   

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were to compare the cortisol response caused by ear tagging piglets with the distress caused by other known painful husbandry procedures (e.g. castration and tail docking) and to evaluate the effectiveness of analgesia with meloxicam to reduce the cortisol response caused by these procedures. In total, 210 male piglets were randomised to equal numbers (n=30) into one of seven groups: a control group which was only handled (H), an ear tagged group that received no analgesia (ET), an ear tagged group with analgesia (ETM), a castration group with no analgesia (C), a castration group with analgesia (CM), a tail-docked group with no analgesia (TD) and a tail-docked group with analgesia (TDM). The procedures were carried out on day 3 or 4 after farrowing. Five blood samples were taken from each piglet: 30 min before the respective procedure (baseline value), and 30, 60 min, 4 and 7 h after processing, to assess cortisol concentrations. Means as well as the area under the curve (AUC) value were analysed and the effective sizes of the procedures were established. At 7 h after the experimental treatment, cortisol concentrations had returned to base values in all groups. ET evoked a greater cortisol response than H piglets at 30 min (P<0.001) and 60 min (P=0.001). The cortisol response to ET was lower than C at 30 min (P=0.001) but did not differ significantly at the other sample times. The mean cortisol response was similar between ET and TD piglets over all sample times. Taking both intensity and duration of the cortisol response into account (AUC), ET evoked a greater response than TD. Analgesia (ETM) resulted in significantly lower cortisol levels than ET at 30 and 60 min post-procedure. Castration (C) provoked the highest cortisol response of all procedures; a significant analgesic effect (CM) was shown only at 4 h post-procedure. TD resulted in significantly higher cortisol levels than H piglets only at 30 min; analgesia (TDM) significantly reduced the cortisol response at 30 min. We conclude that ear tagging causes a dramatic increase in cortisol levels compared with handling alone in piglets, which suggests that this procedure causes substantial distress. However, further research is needed to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  castration; cortisol; ear tags; piglet; tail docking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146422     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116000811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Salivary microRNAs are potential biomarkers for the accurate and precise identification of inflammatory response after tail docking and castration in piglets.

Authors:  Cristina Lecchi; Valentina Zamarian; Chiara Gini; Chiara Avanzini; Alessia Polloni; Sara Rota Nodari; Fabrizio Ceciliani
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Handling Associated with Drenching Does Not Impact Survival and General Health of Low Birth Weight Piglets.

Authors:  Kevin Van Tichelen; Sara Prims; Miriam Ayuso; Céline Van Kerschaver; Mario Vandaele; Jeroen Degroote; Steven Van Cruchten; Joris Michiels; Chris Van Ginneken
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Comparative effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at castration and tail-docking in neonatal piglets.

Authors:  Emma Nixon; Alexandra R Carlson; Patricia A Routh; Liliana Hernandez; Glen W Almond; Ronald E Baynes; Kristen M Messenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.

Authors:  Paulo V Steagall; Hedie Bustamante; Craig B Johnson; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Impact of Routine Management Procedures on the Welfare of Suckling Piglets.

Authors:  Simone M Schmid; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.