Literature DB >> 27146401

Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats.

Christopher P King1, Abraham A Palmer2, Leah C Solberg Woods3, Larry W Hawk4, Jerry B Richards5, Paul J Meyer4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Disorders of behavioral regulation, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug addiction, are in part due to poor inhibitory control, attentional deficits, and hyper-responsivity to reward-associated cues.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether these traits are related, we tested genetically variable male and female heterogeneous stock rats in the choice reaction time (CRT) task and Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA). Sex differences in the response to methylphenidate during the CRT were also assessed.
METHODS: In the CRT task, rats were required to withhold responding until one of two lights indicated whether responses into a left or right port would be reinforced with water. Reaction time on correct trials and premature responses were the operational definitions of attention and response inhibition, respectively. Rats were also pretreated with oral methylphenidate (0, 2, 4 mg/kg) during the CRT task to determine whether this drug would improve performance. Subsequently, during PavCA, presentation of an illuminated lever predicted the delivery of a food pellet into a food-cup. Lever-directed approach (sign-tracking) and food-cup approach (goal-tracking) were the primary measures, and rats were categorized as "sign-trackers" and "goal-trackers" using an index based on these measures.
RESULTS: Sign-trackers made more premature responses than goal-trackers but showed no differences in reaction time. There were sex differences in both tasks, with females having higher sign-tracking, completing more CRT trials, and making more premature responses after methylphenidate administration.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that response inhibition is related to reward-cue responsivity, suggesting that these traits are influenced by common genetic factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action impulsivity; Associative learning; Autoshaping; Classical conditioning; Conditioned response; Feeding behavior; Incentive salience; Motivation; Reward stimuli; Stimulant drugs

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146401      PMCID: PMC5025873          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4306-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  79 in total

1.  Improving working memory in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the separate and combined effects of incentives and stimulant medication.

Authors:  Michael T Strand; Larry W Hawk; Michelle Bubnik; Keri Shiels; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2012-10

2.  Sex differences in attentional performance and their modulation by methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Thomas Günther; Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.576

3.  Heterogeneous stock rats: a new model to study the genetics of renal phenotypes.

Authors:  Leah C Solberg Woods; Cary Stelloh; Kevin R Regner; Tiffany Schwabe; Jessica Eisenhauer; Michael R Garrett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2010-03-10

4.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

5.  Behavioral disinhibition requires dopamine receptor activation.

Authors:  Marcel M van Gaalen; Reinhild J Brueggeman; Patricia F C Bronius; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Age and sex differences in impulsive action in rats: the role of dopamine and glutamate.

Authors:  Christie L Burton; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Stimulant treatment reduces lapses in attention among children with ADHD: the effects of methylphenidate on intra-individual response time distributions.

Authors:  Sarah V Spencer; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards; Keri Shiels; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-08

Review 8.  Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes.

Authors:  Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Evaluating cognitive and motivational accounts of greater reinforcement effects among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Whitney D Fosco; Larry W Hawk; Keri S Rosch; Michelle G Bubnik
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Methylphenidate improves response inhibition but not reflection-impulsivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Elise E DeVito; Andrew D Blackwell; Luke Clark; Lindsey Kent; Anna Maria Dezsery; Danielle C Turner; Michael R F Aitken; Barbara J Sahakian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  14 in total

1.  β-Arrestin-Biased Allosteric Modulator of NTSR1 Selectively Attenuates Addictive Behaviors.

Authors:  Lauren M Slosky; Yushi Bai; Krisztian Toth; Caroline Ray; Lauren K Rochelle; Alexandra Badea; Rahul Chandrasekhar; Vladimir M Pogorelov; Dennis M Abraham; Namratha Atluri; Satyamaheshwar Peddibhotla; Michael P Hedrick; Paul Hershberger; Patrick Maloney; Hong Yuan; Zibo Li; William C Wetsel; Anthony B Pinkerton; Lawrence S Barak; Marc G Caron
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Adrenergic manipulation inhibits pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors.

Authors:  Kyle Z Pasquariello; Marina Han; Cagla Unal; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Adolescent cannabinoid exposure effects on natural reward seeking and learning in rats.

Authors:  H Schoch; M Y Huerta; C M Ruiz; M R Farrell; K M Jung; J J Huang; R R Campbell; D Piomelli; S V Mahler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Cdh13 and AdipoQ gene knockout alter instrumental and Pavlovian drug conditioning.

Authors:  C P King; L Militello; A Hart; C L St Pierre; E Leung; C L Versaggi; N Roberson; J Catlin; A A Palmer; J B Richards; P J Meyer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  The tendency to sign-track predicts cue-induced reinstatement during nicotine self-administration, and is enhanced by nicotine but not ethanol.

Authors:  Cassandra L Versaggi; Christopher P King; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Using Heterogeneous Stocks for Fine-Mapping Genetically Complex Traits.

Authors:  Leah C Solberg Woods; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

7.  Sex-dependent impact of early-life stress and adult immobilization in the attribution of incentive salience in rats.

Authors:  Silvia Fuentes; Javier Carrasco; Abigail Hatto; Juan Navarro; Antonio Armario; Manel Monsonet; Jordi Ortiz; Roser Nadal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sex-dependent associations between addiction-related behaviors and the microbiome in outbred rats.

Authors:  Veronica L Peterson; Jerry B Richards; Paul J Meyer; Raul Cabrera-Rubio; Jordan A Tripi; Christopher P King; Oksana Polesskaya; Amelie Baud; Apurva S Chitre; Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen; Leah Solberg Woods; Fiona Crispie; Timothy G Dinan; Paul D Cotter; Abraham A Palmer; John F Cryan
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 8.143

9.  Prenatal Ethanol Exposure Leads to Attention Deficits in Both Male and Female Rats.

Authors:  Ruixiang Wang; Connor D Martin; Anna L Lei; Kathryn A Hausknecht; Keita Ishiwari; Jerry B Richards; Samir Haj-Dahmane; Roh-Yu Shen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  George H Vousden; Sloane Paulcan; Trevor W Robbins; Dawn M Eagle; Amy L Milton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.