Christopher P King1, Abraham A Palmer2, Leah C Solberg Woods3, Larry W Hawk4, Jerry B Richards5, Paul J Meyer4. 1. Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. cpking@buffalo.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Human and Molecular Genetics, Center Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. 5. Research Institute on Addictions, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Disorders of behavioral regulation, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug addiction, are in part due to poor inhibitory control, attentional deficits, and hyper-responsivity to reward-associated cues. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether these traits are related, we tested genetically variable male and female heterogeneous stock rats in the choice reaction time (CRT) task and Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA). Sex differences in the response to methylphenidate during the CRT were also assessed. METHODS: In the CRT task, rats were required to withhold responding until one of two lights indicated whether responses into a left or right port would be reinforced with water. Reaction time on correct trials and premature responses were the operational definitions of attention and response inhibition, respectively. Rats were also pretreated with oral methylphenidate (0, 2, 4 mg/kg) during the CRT task to determine whether this drug would improve performance. Subsequently, during PavCA, presentation of an illuminated lever predicted the delivery of a food pellet into a food-cup. Lever-directed approach (sign-tracking) and food-cup approach (goal-tracking) were the primary measures, and rats were categorized as "sign-trackers" and "goal-trackers" using an index based on these measures. RESULTS: Sign-trackers made more premature responses than goal-trackers but showed no differences in reaction time. There were sex differences in both tasks, with females having higher sign-tracking, completing more CRT trials, and making more premature responses after methylphenidate administration. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that response inhibition is related to reward-cue responsivity, suggesting that these traits are influenced by common genetic factors.
RATIONALE: Disorders of behavioral regulation, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug addiction, are in part due to poor inhibitory control, attentional deficits, and hyper-responsivity to reward-associated cues. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether these traits are related, we tested genetically variable male and female heterogeneous stock rats in the choice reaction time (CRT) task and Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA). Sex differences in the response to methylphenidate during the CRT were also assessed. METHODS: In the CRT task, rats were required to withhold responding until one of two lights indicated whether responses into a left or right port would be reinforced with water. Reaction time on correct trials and premature responses were the operational definitions of attention and response inhibition, respectively. Rats were also pretreated with oral methylphenidate (0, 2, 4 mg/kg) during the CRT task to determine whether this drug would improve performance. Subsequently, during PavCA, presentation of an illuminated lever predicted the delivery of a food pellet into a food-cup. Lever-directed approach (sign-tracking) and food-cup approach (goal-tracking) were the primary measures, and rats were categorized as "sign-trackers" and "goal-trackers" using an index based on these measures. RESULTS: Sign-trackers made more premature responses than goal-trackers but showed no differences in reaction time. There were sex differences in both tasks, with females having higher sign-tracking, completing more CRT trials, and making more premature responses after methylphenidate administration. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that response inhibition is related to reward-cue responsivity, suggesting that these traits are influenced by common genetic factors.
Authors: Michael T Strand; Larry W Hawk; Michelle Bubnik; Keri Shiels; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2012-10
Authors: Leah C Solberg Woods; Cary Stelloh; Kevin R Regner; Tiffany Schwabe; Jessica Eisenhauer; Michael R Garrett Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2010-03-10
Authors: Marcel M van Gaalen; Reinhild J Brueggeman; Patricia F C Bronius; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Louk J M J Vanderschuren Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Sarah V Spencer; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards; Keri Shiels; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2009-08
Authors: Elise E DeVito; Andrew D Blackwell; Luke Clark; Lindsey Kent; Anna Maria Dezsery; Danielle C Turner; Michael R F Aitken; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Lauren M Slosky; Yushi Bai; Krisztian Toth; Caroline Ray; Lauren K Rochelle; Alexandra Badea; Rahul Chandrasekhar; Vladimir M Pogorelov; Dennis M Abraham; Namratha Atluri; Satyamaheshwar Peddibhotla; Michael P Hedrick; Paul Hershberger; Patrick Maloney; Hong Yuan; Zibo Li; William C Wetsel; Anthony B Pinkerton; Lawrence S Barak; Marc G Caron Journal: Cell Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: H Schoch; M Y Huerta; C M Ruiz; M R Farrell; K M Jung; J J Huang; R R Campbell; D Piomelli; S V Mahler Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: C P King; L Militello; A Hart; C L St Pierre; E Leung; C L Versaggi; N Roberson; J Catlin; A A Palmer; J B Richards; P J Meyer Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Silvia Fuentes; Javier Carrasco; Abigail Hatto; Juan Navarro; Antonio Armario; Manel Monsonet; Jordi Ortiz; Roser Nadal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Veronica L Peterson; Jerry B Richards; Paul J Meyer; Raul Cabrera-Rubio; Jordan A Tripi; Christopher P King; Oksana Polesskaya; Amelie Baud; Apurva S Chitre; Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen; Leah Solberg Woods; Fiona Crispie; Timothy G Dinan; Paul D Cotter; Abraham A Palmer; John F Cryan Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Ruixiang Wang; Connor D Martin; Anna L Lei; Kathryn A Hausknecht; Keita Ishiwari; Jerry B Richards; Samir Haj-Dahmane; Roh-Yu Shen Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.677