| Literature DB >> 27146250 |
Kui Liu1, Jian Cai2, Shan Wang3, Zhaofan Wu4, Li Li1, Tao Jiang1, Bin Chen1, Gaofeng Cai1, Zhenggang Jiang1, Yongdi Chen1, Zhengting Wang1, Xuhui Zhu1, Liuru Hu5, Hua Gu1,4, Jianmin Jiang1.
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus is a common hepatotropic virus that causes serious gastrointestinal symptoms. Data of reported HEV cases in Zhejiang Province was collected between 2007 and 2012. Descriptive epidemiological methods and spatial-temporal epidemiological methods were used to investigate the epidemiological trends and identify high-risk regions of hepatitis E infection. In this study, the average morbidity of hepatitis E infection was 4.03 per 100,000 in Zhejiang Province, peaking in winter and spring. The ratio between the male and the female was 2.39:1, and the high-risk population was found to be aged between 40 and 60. Trend surface analysis and IDW maps revealed higher incidences in the northwestern counties. The spatial-temporal analysis showed comparable incidences in the counties at the basins of three rivers, mostly under administration of Hangzhou Municipality. Besides, the seasonal exponential smoothing method was determined as the better model for the retrieved data. The epidemiological characteristics of HEV suggested the need of strengthened supervision and surveillance of sanitary water, sewage treatment and food in high-risk areas especially around the Spring Festival. Additionally, time series model could be useful for forecasting the epidemics of HEV in future. All these findings may contribute to the prevention and control of HEV epidemics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27146250 PMCID: PMC4857129 DOI: 10.1038/srep25407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Epidemiological characteristics of HEV infection in Zhejiang Province, China from 2007–2012.
(A) Gender distribution of HEV cases. (B) Incidence rate of HEV infection. (C) Monthly distribution of HEV cases. (D) Aged distribution of HEV cases. (E) Occupational distribution of HEV cases.
Differences in gender and occupation among HEV infected population.
| Gender | Occupations | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peasant | House worker | Cadres | Worker | Trader | Retiree | |
| Male | 4796 | 213 | 429 | 1151 | 338 | 547 |
| Female | 1820 | 401 | 119 | 386 | 130 | 292 |
Figure 2Incidence map of HEV infection in Zhejiang Province from 2007 to 2012.
This map was created by ArcGIS software (version 10.1, ESRI Inc.; Redlands, CA, USA). Homepage of ArcGIS software was https://www.esri.com/.
Figure 3IDW interpolation of HEV Infection map in Zhejiang Province from 2007 to 2012.
This map was created by ArcGIS software (version 10.1, ESRI Inc.; Redlands, CA, USA). Homepage of ArcGIS software was https://www.esri.com/.
Figure 4Trend surface analysis of HEV incidence in Zhejiang Province in 2011.
This map was created by ArcGIS software (version 10.1, ESRI Inc.; Redlands, CA, USA). Homepage of ArcGIS software was https://www.esri.com/.
Fluctuations in HEV incidence in Zhejiang Province from 2007 to 2012.
| Year | Trend from West-East | Trend from South-North | Trend from Southwest-Northeast | Trend from Southeast-Northwest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Decrease | Inversed U Shape | Inversed U Shape | Increase |
| 2008 | Decrease | Increase | Inversed U Shape | Increase |
| 2009 | Decrease | Inversed U Shape | Decrease | Increase |
| 2010 | Decrease | Increase | Inversed U Shape | Increase |
| 2011 | Decrease | Inversed U Shape | Decrease | Increase |
| 2012 | Decrease | Increase | Inversed U Shape | Increase |
| Total | Decrease | Increase | Inversed U Shape | Increase |
General spatial autocorrelation of HEV infection in Zhejiang Province by Global Moran’s I.
| Year | Moran’s I Index | Moran’s I Z-score | Moran’s I |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0.143860 | 2.129288 | 0.033230 |
| 2008 | 0.261897 | 3.740526 | 0.000184 |
| 2009 | 0.308836 | 4.428792 | 0.000009 |
| 2010 | 0.504629 | 7.111626 | 0.000000 |
| 2011 | 0.418085 | 5.929628 | 0.000000 |
| 2012 | 0.512331 | 7.461609 | 0.000000 |
| Total | 0.549637 | 7.764210 | 0.000000 |
Local autocorrelation analysis of HEV in Zhejiang Province by Local Moran’s I and Local Getis-Ord G.
| Year | Area | Correlation Type | Number of Reported cases | Geographic Size (square kilometre) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Changshan | 2.323365 | 0.020160 | 0.000278 | 3.976237 | 0.000070 | High-High Cluster | 27 | 1091.47 |
| 2007 | Sanmen | 2.761487 | 0.005754 | 0.000208 | 3.459347 | 0.000541 | High-High Cluster | 27 | 990.587 |
| 2008 | Lin’an | 2.874604 | 0.004045 | 0.000096 | 3.994173 | 0.000065 | High-High Cluster | 46 | 3108.66 |
| 2008 | Wencheng | −2.735206 | 0.006234 | 0.000218 | 3.445379 | 0.000570 | Low-Low Cluster | 3 | 1270.68 |
| 2008 | Daishan | −2.742113 | 0.006105 | 0.000136 | 3.421568 | 0.000623 | Low-Low Cluster | 2 | 268.933 |
| 2009 | Lin’an | 4.155629 | 0.000032 | 0.000189 | 7.939035 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 68 | 3108.66 |
| 2009 | Kaihua | 3.439441 | 0.000583 | 0.000178 | 4.247612 | 0.000022 | High-High Cluster | 20 | 2243.45 |
| 2009 | Jiangshan | 2.859664 | 0.004241 | 0.000106 | 3.0258 | 0.002480 | High-High Cluster | 33 | 2000.25 |
| 2009 | Changshan | 3.906149 | 0.000094 | 0.000557 | 8.004969 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 28 | 1091.47 |
| 2009 | Kecheng | 3.301447 | 0.000962 | 0.000549 | 5.515519 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 27 | 620.122 |
| 2009 | Qujiang | 3.277453 | 0.001047 | 0.000409 | 4.133326 | 0.000036 | High-High Cluster | 37 | 1741.49 |
| 2009 | Sanmen | 2.937537 | 0.003308 | 0.000290 | 4.858313 | 0.000001 | High-High Cluster | 30 | 990.587 |
| 2010 | Lin’an | 2.598504 | 0.009363 | 0.000079 | 3.305329 | 0.000949 | High-High Cluster | 50 | 3108.66 |
| 2010 | Xiacheng | 2.882534 | 0.003945 | 0.001347 | 4.392129 | 0.000011 | High-High Cluster | 30 | 30.5015 |
| 2010 | Shangcheng | 2.520364 | 0.011723 | 0.000837 | 2.884501 | 0.003920 | High-High Cluster | 23 | 26.3608 |
| 2010 | Gongshu | 2.882534 | 0.003945 | 0.002213 | 7.78938 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 55 | 68.3854 |
| 2010 | Binjiang | 2.520364 | 0.011723 | 0.001289 | 4.929564 | 0.000001 | High-High Cluster | 11 | 73.5799 |
| 2010 | Yuhang | 3.70827 | 0.000209 | 0.000700 | 5.100778 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 62 | 1208.13 |
| 2010 | Xihu | 3.498442 | 0.000468 | 0.001454 | 6.977568 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 53 | 316.974 |
| 2010 | Deqing | 3.929277 | 0.000085 | −0.000266 | −2.448328 | 0.014352 | Low-High Cluster | 13 | 975.259 |
| 2010 | Daishan | −2.849547 | 0.004378 | 0.000149 | 3.776575 | 0.000159 | Low-Low Cluster | 0 | 268.933 |
| 2010 | Shengsi | −2.457609 | 0.013987 | 0.000068 | 3.008329 | 0.002627 | Low-Low Cluster | 0 | 75.2655 |
| 2010 | Dinghai | −2.540258 | 0.011077 | 0.000224 | 3.146424 | 0.001653 | Low-Low Cluster | 3 | 502.969 |
| 2011 | Tonglu | 3.503193 | 0.000460 | 0.000213 | 3.967588 | 0.000073 | High-High Cluster | 35 | 1849.72 |
| 2011 | Fuyang | 3.540464 | 0.000399 | 0.000370 | 5.06371 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 71 | 1815.07 |
| 2011 | Lin’an | 3.547191 | 0.000389 | 0.000109 | 4.596999 | 0.000004 | High-High Cluster | 93 | 3108.66 |
| 2011 | Yuhang | 2.880442 | 0.003971 | 0.000472 | 3.455068 | 0.000550 | High-High Cluster | 103 | 1208.13 |
| 2011 | Xihu | 2.660141 | 0.007811 | 0.000788 | 3.804385 | 0.000142 | High-High Cluster | 82 | 316.974 |
| 2011 | Daishan | −2.713581 | 0.006656 | 0.000135 | 3.431266 | 0.000601 | Low-Low Cluster | 0 | 268.933 |
| 2011 | Beilun | −2.814063 | 0.004892 | 0.000266 | 2.896999 | 0.003768 | Low-Low Cluster | 10 | 549.991 |
| 2011 | Dinghai | −2.862032 | 0.004209 | 0.000243 | 3.417995 | 0.000631 | Low-Low Cluster | 4 | 502.969 |
| 2012 | Tonglu | 4.727728 | 0.000002 | 0.000235 | 4.512294 | 0.000006 | High-High Cluster | 29 | 1849.72 |
| 2012 | Fuyang | 5.014653 | 0.000001 | 0.001148 | 16.114149 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 132 | 1815.07 |
| 2012 | Lin’an | 3.756233 | 0.000172 | 0.000090 | 3.902807 | 0.000095 | High-High Cluster | 110 | 3108.66 |
| 2012 | Xiacheng | 3.299505 | 0.000969 | 0.001324 | 4.454942 | 0.000008 | High-High Cluster | 49 | 30.5015 |
| 2012 | Shangcheng | 2.971575 | 0.002963 | 0.002044 | 7.216213 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 50 | 26.3608 |
| 2012 | Gongshu | 3.299505 | 0.000969 | 0.000834 | 3.048334 | 0.002301 | High-High Cluster | 41 | 68.3854 |
| 2012 | Xihu | 4.099386 | 0.000041 | 0.001891 | 9.35784 | 0.000000 | High-High Cluster | 105 | 316.974 |
Figure 5Spatial-temporal clustering of HEV infection from 2007 to 2012 in Zhejiang Province.
The most likely cluster included Lin’an, Tonglu, Anji, Fuyang, Yuhang, Xihu, Gongshu, Deqing, Chun’an, Shangcheng, Jiande, Binjiang, Xiacheng; The secord-most likely cluster included Sanmen, Linhai, Ninghai; The third-most likely cluster included Songyang, Yunhe, Suichang, Liandu, Wuyi, Longquan, Jingning,Wucheng, Longyou, Qingtian, Qujiang, Jinyun, Jiangshan, Yongkang, Wencheng, Jindong, Kecheng, Qingyuan, Lanxi, Taishun, Changshan. This map was created by ArcGIS software with Homepage of https://www.esri.com/ (version 10.1, ESRI Inc.; Redlands, CA, USA) and SaTScan software (version 9.1.1, Boston, MA, USA). SaTScan TM is a trademark of Martin Kulldorff. The SaTScan TM software was developed under the joint auspices of (i) Martin Kulldorff, (ii) the National Cancer Institute, and (iii) Farzad Mostashari of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Critical indexes of ARIMA model and simple seasonal ESM.
| Model | BIC | R-Square | RMSE | MAPE | MAE | MSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARIMA(6,1,0) | 7.30 | 0.73 | 36.31 | 15.94 | 27.56 | 1318.56 |
| Simple Seasonal ESM | 7.11 | 0.78 | 33.04 | 14.25 | 24.63 | 1091.38 |
Figure 6Prediction of time series model for the HEV infection of Zhejiang Province in 2013 using the simple seasonal ESM.
This map was created by SPSS Statistics 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA).
Prediction results of 12 months in 2013 using Simple Seasonal ESM.
| Time | Reported Cases | Predicted Cases 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Jan-2013 | 238 | 138.8(72.91,204.69) |
| Feb-2013 | 252 | 134.8(61.14,208.46) |
| Mar-2013 | 285 | 123.63(42.96,204.31) |
| Apr-2013 | 160 | 144.47(57.33,231.6) |
| May-2013 | 146 | 182.8(89.65,275.95) |
| Jun-2013 | 79 | 137.3(38.5,236.1) |
| Jul-2013 | 97 | 130.97(26.83,235.1) |
| Aug-2013 | 88 | 110.13(0.92,219.35) |
| Sep-2013 | 112 | 115.47(1.4,229.54) |
| Oct-2013 | 112 | 128.8(10.07,247.53) |
| Nov-2013 | 126 | 172.14(48.93,295.34) |
| Dec-2013 | 138 | 123.3(−4.23,250.83) |
CI: confidence interval.